¶ … military strategies employed by Alexander the Great and how he was able to skillfully use his political and military skills in conquering most of Europe and Asia in his time.
Alexandros III Philippou Makedonon reigned as the king of Macedonia from 356-323 B.C. He was born to King Philip and his third wife, Olympias in July 356 BC in Pella, Macedonia. He is remembered as one of the greatest military genius in history. During his lifetime, he conquered much of world, since his main ambition was to conquer the world and create world monarchy.
Alexander, was the strong, handsome commander leading his army using the best military strategies of his time. His army was armed with sarisses, the fearful five and half meter long spears. He was the first great conqueror to invade Greece, Egypt, and India. He was popular for creating ethnic syncretism between the Macedonians and the conquered people, especially the Persians. During his conquests, his mission was to spread the Greek culture as well as the Roman Civilization and Christianity.
His father was a luminous ruler and strategist. Alexander was more ambitious than his father; when he heard of Philip's conquests and he remarked:
My father will get ahead of me in everything, and will leave nothing great for me to do.
As a young boy, Alexander was brave and strong. At the minor age of 12, he tamed the beautiful Bucephalus horse that no one else could ride. Philip was proud of Alexander's horsemanship and said:
my son, seek out a kingdom worthy of thyself, for Macedonia is too little for thee.
Alexander was very fond of Homeric epics, he even knew the Iliad by heart and also slept with the Iliad under his pillow.
Alexander was taught by Aristotle at Mieza, along with other boys belonging to the Macedonian aristocracy from the age of 13 to 16. Aristotle, taught him about the world of arts and sciences.
Alexander is considered to be not only one of the greatest military commanders in history, but also a skilled politician, with a strong personality, which was full of compassion for others especially his army men.
The personality of the general is indispensable, he is the head, he is the all of an army.... It was not the Macedonian Phalanx which penetrated to India, but Alexander."
Napoleon Bonaparte
Words such as brilliant and genius are used to characterize him as a skilled commander. Major General J.F.C. Fuller, author of The Generalship of Alexander the Great, in his book describes his genius using the following words, "binds the Great Captains into a common brotherhood." Fuller also states that "it was Alexander's genius that gave soul to his army."
Alexander's strong personality, physical and moral courage, bravery, ambitions, determination, victories and achievements created a feeling of admiration, security and affection in his troops.
Alexander had the ability to adopt strategies for any kind of warfare, whether they were major battles, sieges, minor skirmishes, guerrilla opposition or even revolts. This was one of the main skills that made him have an edge above other great commanders. He is remembered for never losing a battle during his 10 years of campaign between 335 and 325 BC, and he fought a major battle or siege at least once every year in this period. The highly trained, well-equipped army Alexander inherited from his father was able to adapt to and meet the challenges of type of warfare. Fuller describes the army as "the most perfectly organized, trained, and equipped army of ancient times." [J.F.C. Fuller. Generalship of Alexander the Great (1958)]
Alexander was well-known for motivating and boosting his men's morale. This is quite significant because today many well-known and famous military leaders lay great emphasis on the importance of taking care of their soldiers not only to boost morale but also maintain a cohesive unit. Alexander was to every extent an excellent leader, showing his caliber as a brave man leading his men into battle and also showing his genuine concern for their welfare. He was also considerate when it came to fighting battles because he would never ask his men to do what he would not or could not do himself.
Fuller takes a look at one insightful ritual in his book: "Before battle, he would ride down the ranks, and call aloud by name, [those men] which in previous battles had performed conspicuous deeds of valor. Being praised before his comrades by the commander himself in this manner must have been a major morale booster for a soldier. After the battle he would care for his wounded...
Instead, while under false arrest and retreating from the Macedonians, Darius was killed by one of his subjects. Because the battle at Gaugamela marked the turning point in the battle between the Macedonians and the Achaemenids, it is clear that if Darius was to have been able to defeat Alexander and his troops, he would have needed to do so before the battle at Gaugamela. Therefore, it is important to
Both points-of-view may be absolutely correct, but neither really addresses the issue of whether or not Alexander was truly great. Perhaps the best way to evaluate Alexander's greatness is to look at the lasting effects that he had on civilization. First and foremost, Alexander conquered the known world. "Before Alexander world civilization had been dominated by eastern cultures - Persians, Egyptians, and Babylonians. Alexander shifted the spotlight once and for all.
Ancient Greek Warfare From the Mycenaeans to the Polis The rapid progress experienced by the Ancient Greek in a relatively short period of time was reflected by the multitude of domains that started to flourish in the region. The appearance of city-states led to people being able to concentrate on improving warfare strategies as well as weapons. Even with this, Greek development in warfare started to see particular interest in earlier
American Revolution: Competing for the Loyalty of the Colonists The American Revolution had many causes, both economic and social in nature. It had also been brewing for many years, ever since the conclusion of the Seven Years' War with the French, in which the British government closed settlement of the West to the colonists. In doing so, the Crown posted soldiers on the Western frontier to keep Americans out of it,
private military companies Iraq illustrate a trend warfare? -No, Historical reasons great empires employed a large number mercenaries.-What reasons, -Type firms, divided types- type spear Private military companies Today's society is more challenging and dynamic than it has ever been. And this trend is manifested within the military sector as well. Here, the employees in the division have to be better motivated in order to risk their lives and this motivation
Proposals for action "must first convince the audience that a problem exists and make the audience want action. Often, these arguments consider ethical situations: if the situation is wrong, then the solution must make it right" ("Writing Tip #21). Alexander identifies his men as the cause of being able to claim so many cities; "through your courage and endurance you have gained possession of Ionia, the Hellespont, both Phrygias,
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now