Microsoft and Their Legal Battles with Free and Open Source (FOSS) Microsoft has always vigorously protected its patents and sought out legal defense against competing technologies and businesses that threatened its core business model. In 2006, Microsoft mounted a comprehensive and well-orchestrated attack on open software, alleging that 235 of their core patents had been infringed on and they were due damages from Novell and several other publishers of open source operating systems. Microsoft believed they would have a quick and decisive victory over the Free and Open Source (FOSS) community, establishing a very defensible legal precedent and being able to create a long-term barrier to their impact on the Microsoft business model (McGhee, 2007). This did not occur however, and at the close of 2006, Microsoft and Novell brokered an agreement that saved each millions of dollars in legal fees. What Microsoft had meant as an inhibitor...
Developers and distributors of FOSS operating systems and applications rallied around the decision and sought to make their standard pervasive throughout corporate America (Miller, Voas, Costello, 2010). FOSS, which had initially been viewed as not as secure or reliable as Microsoft proprietary software, chose as an industry to concentrate on the key criterion that corporate purchasers cared most about. This included heavy investments in auditability, security, stability and fault tolerance, in addition to application scalability (McGhee, 2007). This strategy worked and led to the development of FOSS as the new standard in many enterprises.
Open source software has recently emerged as the frontrunner for many industries as the primary method of code production, as it is widely predicted to provide more options for its users in a quicker, quality improved, and cost effective format than the more traditional proprietary software. Linux, the dominant player in the market, is a considerable threat to the Microsoft operating system, which has successfully established itself in the global
Microsoft and their Battle with FOSS Microsoft and Their Legal Battles with Free and Open Source (FOSS) In 2006, Microsoft mounted a major offensive against open source software providers, claiming copyright infringement of 235 different patents. Later in the year, Microsoft entered into an agreement with Novell to ensure both would avert costly litigation over open source patents. Microsoft believed that they would quickly attain legal victory over the Free and Open
Selling enterprise software with channel partners requires Microsoft to create a separate department just for training, coordination of pricing and product requests, and also define entirely new delivery platforms for the applications as well. The Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platform has been legitimized by Salesforce.com. Microsoft is reinventing itself to in this area so they can better sell with resellers and partners, and also better capitalize on the growing popularity of
We provide a description and screen-shots of each program, so you can get an idea of what it does before installing (www.theopencd.org)." The site works to make installation and uninstalling an easy clean process so that users do not have to worry about doing any damage to their computer in the process. The site allows users to download the programs, use them as they are, or tweak them for improvement and
Wikileaks Ethics issues raised by the conduct of the American government in dealing with Wikileaks and Assange The behavior of the American government towards Wikileaks raises serious ethical issues related to government intimidation of the private company. The founder of Wikileaks has also experienced a great deal of harassment in light of the Wikileaks scandal which has called into question the integrity of the American government in pursuing justice through means that
Nowhere is this gap more visible than in the field of mobile computing devices. Apple, Google, Microsoft, Samsung, and HTC, among many others, are currently involved in a web of costly patent infringement suits. Perhaps it is time to examine whether computer software patents fulfill their intended purpose of promoting technological innovation and economic growth Through its high-quality, no-cost Android OS, Google allowed mobile phone hardware manufacturers to make a
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now