Verified Document

Microsoft And Their Legal Battles With Free And Open Source Term Paper

Microsoft and Their Legal Battles with Free and Open Source (FOSS) Microsoft has always vigorously protected its patents and sought out legal defense against competing technologies and businesses that threatened its core business model. In 2006, Microsoft mounted a comprehensive and well-orchestrated attack on open software, alleging that 235 of their core patents had been infringed on and they were due damages from Novell and several other publishers of open source operating systems. Microsoft believed they would have a quick and decisive victory over the Free and Open Source (FOSS) community, establishing a very defensible legal precedent and being able to create a long-term barrier to their impact on the Microsoft business model (McGhee, 2007). This did not occur however, and at the close of 2006, Microsoft and Novell brokered an agreement that saved each millions of dollars in legal fees. What Microsoft had meant as an inhibitor...

Parts of this document are hidden

View Full Document
svg-one

Developers and distributors of FOSS operating systems and applications rallied around the decision and sought to make their standard pervasive throughout corporate America (Miller, Voas, Costello, 2010). FOSS, which had initially been viewed as not as secure or reliable as Microsoft proprietary software, chose as an industry to concentrate on the key criterion that corporate purchasers cared most about. This included heavy investments in auditability, security, stability and fault tolerance, in addition to application scalability (McGhee, 2007). This strategy worked and led to the development of FOSS as the new standard in many enterprises.
Analyzing the Proliferation of FOSS

When Microsoft began its legal assault on FOSS many industry and financial analysts predicted its demise and eventual re-licensing under…

Sources used in this document:
References

McGhee, D.D. (2007). Free and open source software licenses: Benefits, risks, and steps toward ensuring compliance. Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, 19(11), 5-0_1.

Miller, K.W., Voas, J., & Costello, T. (2010). Free and open source software. IT Professional Magazine, 12(6), 14-16.

Wormser, D.A. (2010). Open-source software: The value of "free." Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, 22(5), 22-0_1.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Microsoft Access Computing Technology Has Greatly Aided
Words: 860 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Microsoft Access Computing technology has greatly aided human technology and has presented new and easier ways for goals and objectives to be accomplished by its users. Technology works best when it is mostly aligned with the intent and purposes of its wielders and it is important to understand and know how such applications work and operate in order to get the most out of these tools. The purpose of this essay is

Microsoft Dupont Analysis of Microsoft Dupont Analysis
Words: 562 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Microsoft DuPont DuPont Analysis of Microsoft DuPont Analysis Overview The DuPont Analysis is a type of analysis that provides a more detailed look at a company's Return on Equity (ROE) by breaking it into three main components. The three components are profit margin, asset turnover and a leverage factor. By separating the ROE into these smaller categories, investors can quickly identify how effectively or efficiently a company is using their resources. If any

Microsoft Monopoly Why Was Microsoft Investigated for
Words: 1173 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Microsoft Monopoly Why was Microsoft investigated for antitrust behavior? In the eyes of some legal analysts, Microsoft was investigated and taken to court over antitrust allegations because of the belief that it would not live up to its own word about what it intended (McKenzie and Shughart, 1998). There was little doubt about the fact that by the mid- to late-1990s Microsoft had virtual control over the operating system (Windows) that it

Microsoft's Vega Project
Words: 1351 Length: 4 Document Type: Case Study

Microsoft's Vega Project Microsoft Vega Project Companies' success on the market relies on the performance of their employees, which is determined by several factors. Human resources practices in these companies aim at recruiting and maintaining skilled employees that can develop as strong assets to them, while developing motivational strategies in accordance with employees' needs and preferences. Microsoft is one of the companies that invest the most in the development of their employees. Situation

Microsoft Windows File Systems: Comparison and Contrast
Words: 1164 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Microsoft Windows File Systems: Comparison and Contrast The standard versions of Windows use three types of file systems: FAT, exFAT, and NTFS. Windows 8 server also uses ReFS. The 8 server (Windows Server 2012) is the only version that uses that type of file system, as the other versions of Windows are not able to boot from that type of file system at all. In order to better understand these file

Microsoft Monopoly Assessment of Microsoft's Monopoly Microsoft
Words: 744 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Microsoft Monopoly Assessment of Microsoft's Monopoly Microsoft has for decades engaged in commercial activities both with its direct enterprise customers and its many distribution channel partners that could be considered monopolistic. While Microsoft has long asserted it is one of the most efficient competitors there are in an oligopolistically-based market of enterprise and consumer software, in reality its strategies and tactics show a pattern of deliberate monopolistic behavior (Information Management, 2009). Microsoft

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now