Verified Document

Mexican War 1846-1848 Essay

Mexican-American War (1846-1848) The Great Territorial Loss

From the perspective of the United States, the Mexican-American War, together with the Louisiana Purchase, represented important land acquisitions as part of the country's relentless expansion westward. In this regard, Kurth (1999) reports that, "There were grand achievements in this national project of continental expansion, especially the southwestern annexations, which were achieved through U.S. military victory in the Mexican-American War. In this case, the United States took advantage of the fact that Britain and France were disrupted by serious internal turmoil."

With Britain and France otherwise occupied with their more immediate domestic issues, the U.S. was free to pursue its expansionist Manifest Destiny plans for the Western regions of the country, including most especially California and its vast resources and temperate weather.

From the perspective of the Mexicans, though, the invasion by the United States was a heavy-handed blow by an international bully that had provoked a war just to acquire land. The U.S. invasion of Mexico in 1846 resulted in the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo that secured an enormous amount of territory from Mexico, including Texas, New Mexico, and California, for the United States.

Not surprisingly, this humiliating defeat has been the source of longstanding bitterness against the United States by Mexico. The Mexican -- American War that was fought between the United States and Mexico is described by Reiter as being "a semi-exclusionary, moderately repressive regime fighting a long losing war."

Following Mexico's loss to the United States, Mexican president Antonio Lopez Santa Anna fled to Venezuela in exile.

The exiled president's end, though, was not as ignominious as the act indicates. In this regard, Reiter reports that, "Santa Anna resigned the presidency voluntarily, he did so while the war was ongoing (September 1847), and even after he resigned as president he kept his position as leader of Mexico's army."

Although the new Mexican president, Manuel Pena y Pena (who was appointed by Santa Anna)...

According to Huston, "Southerners demanded the privilege of taking slavery into the new territories if the environment permitted profitable undertakings; Northerners wanted slavery absolutely and explicitly excluded from them."
Although comprising a single purportedly united country, the Northern and Southern states were at two extremes in terms of their economies and views about slavery. Following the end of the Mexican War, the United States was larger in geographic size, but the country had added all of this new territory during a period in its history when states' rights about slavery were at the forefront of debate. Increased sectionalism inextricably expanded slavery into these territories and the proviso offered by David Wilmot in 1846 that would restrict slavery to its then existing boundaries was intended to allow the country to develop "normally" under this onerous status quo.

The fundamental issues that were involved, though, did not readily lend themselves to such a straightforward solution. In this regard, Huston emphasizes that, "Northerners often did not react like Lincoln in seeing a demise of slavery by some natural mechanism; instead, they pictured a more complicated scenario."

Conversely, the overarching issues that were involved from the perspective of slave-owning states were more pragmatic and immediate. According to Huston, "Most important, southerners, though exhibiting some confusion in their predictions, believed that limiting slavery to its existing boundaries would produce poverty, depopulation of whites, and ultimately race war."

Clearly, the South's perspective was overwhelmingly economic in nature but political in tone while the North's perspective was political in nature but economic in effect. With so much at stake, it is little wonder that two such divergent perspectives emerged in response to the Wilmot…

Sources used in this document:
References

Coward, John M. "Dispatches from the Mexican War," Journalism History 26 (2000, Spring) 1:

39.

Huston, James L. "Southerners against Secession: The Arguments of the Constitutional

Unionists in 1850-51," Civil War History 46 (2000, December) 4: 280-291.
available: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/general-article/grant-mexican-american-war/.
"The Mexican-American War," Public Broadcasting Service Special Features. [online] available: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/general-article/grant-mexican-american-war/.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Mexican War So Far From
Words: 1968 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

As a reader, the setting descriptions that the author used created an atmosphere of being "present" during the war. The maps used have helped the reader follow the warriors and deal with the facts surrounding the U.S. war with Mexico. The book really represents its era, as it is today, when it comes to the political and military problems and the relationship of the two countries. The denouement of the plot

Mexican-American War and Civil War
Words: 1979 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

More precisely, while the Blacks were in fact the tools of the British presence in America and their desires for freedom were exploited by the Loyalists, in the case of the Indians, their presence in the Civil War was also related to their desire to reshape their territories. Thus, the strong motivation of the Indians after the war began was to reconsider the borders the white people had imposed

Mexican War
Words: 365 Length: 1 Document Type: Essay

Mexican War Unequivocally, the most important results of the Mexican War and the Mexican Cession on the United States were the expansion of territory provided to the fledgling nation. This expansion of territory was well aligned with the notion of Manifest Destiny, or the inherent belief that the entirety of the western portion of the North American continent rightfully belonged to the new nation (regardless of the fact that large parts

Mexican-American War Mr. Polk's War
Words: 1237 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

Perhaps because he was writing in the wake of the Vietnam Era, Schroeder is highly conscious of the 'dammed if you do, damned if you don't' position anti-war politicians often find themselves, when it comes to morally and financially supporting the troops abroad. As was often the case since, most Congressmen, agreed to send aid, even if they opposed the war. But even if congress voted to apportion funds, and

Mexican American War
Words: 703 Length: 2 Document Type: Research Proposal

Mexican-American War FAR-REACHING IMPACT The purpose of this paper is to trace and establish the political effects of the Mexican-American War, fought between the two countries from 1846 to 1848. Also called the U.S.-Mexico War, it is known in the U.S. As plainly the Mexican War. In Mexico, as the North American Invasion of Mexico, the United States War against Mexico, and the War of Northern Aggression. This paper summarizes the background,

Mexican-American War Took Place Between
Words: 772 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

The idea that Americans had the right to expand became known as Manifest Destiny that first appeared in print in 1845, but had been popular for decades prior. The idea was that American's "manifest desitiny [was] to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our multiplying millions." In other words, God granted Americans the right to move West and take whatever land possible. This was

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now