Verified Document

Mcgregor Theory X Theory Y Essay

( Place security above other factors-to reiterate increased pay seemed to be the primary motivational factor in improving work and this was rarely and option, so security was a primary concern but responsibility was not sought. Most lacked the confidence to attempt to obtain higher levels of responsibility. Ultimately most simply followed the rules to ensure they would still have their job on the next pay period.

The X theory aspects served as an introduction to work for many people. Teaching them the boundaries of the work environment as well as work ethic they may not learn otherwise. This transitional type job is an essential one in any capitalistic society as it shows people why they should seek higher order actions and thoughts, while it allows a place for those who never recognize this.

Theory Y Setting

Conversely, I have worked in settings were skilled individuals were sought to perform higher order work and were successfully managed in the setting with a presumption of Y characteristics. At this center for creativity the workforce was made up mostly of educated professionals with many years of experience in the industry. To further develop creativity management found it necessary to apply Y factor principles to allow higher order treatment for higher order minded people. People productive and dedicated and fully accepted the responsibility of creativity.

( Take work naturally just like sex and play-most individuals in the workplace cooperatively explored their home and work life by sharing information but not conflict form home with those around them. They also made every effort to socialize with their workmates. Those who fit in to this environment were happy to arrive at work and happy to return home at the end of the day.

( Exercise self-direction and control if committed to objectives-as much of the work was self conceived or project group conceived, the input of self and others were a part of the creative process and therefore contributed to the individual buy in that drove tasks forward. When stagnation occurred it was often because of a lack of...

Great illumination of purpose would often alleviate the concern and get the project back on track.
( People can learn to accept responsibility-Though the system was egalitarian there were also plenty of individual around to suggest leadership on tasks as well as accept it when needed. Leadership was often accepted based on expertise or interest in a given task or project.

( Ability to make innovative decisions is evenly dispersed throughout the population-every level of the company had influence and development opportunities that would make their own jobs and the jobs of others better. Suggestions for change came from interns and the facilities maintenance staff as often as they came from the management and this continued because people were willing to listen and respond to the need for innovation.

Conclusion

It is clear that though the XY theories are simplistic they do apply broadly to work settings and there are clearly settings where they work and do not work. Situations that were described in the X factor section rarely occur in the Y factor section or setting and when they do they are rapidly dealt with. This often involved individuals leaving the organization, if it did not meet their developmental level. In other words, if an innovative person were present in the X setting (manager or subordinate) they rarely remained long and if an individual who needed a great deal of X treatment ended up in the Y setting they often rapidly changed their skill set to become more independent and innovative or they simply left. (Mind Tools, 2010)

References

Robbins, S.P. & Judge, T.A. (2008). Organizational Behavior: Motivation Concepts. Washington DC: PHI.

Shah, K. & Shah, P.J. (2008). "Theories of Motivation." Referenced 18th February, 2010 from: http://www.laynetworks.com/Theories-of-Motivation.html

Mind Tools (2010) "Theory X and Theory Y: Understanding team member motivation" Referenced 18th February, 2010 from: http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_74.htm

Sources used in this document:
References

Robbins, S.P. & Judge, T.A. (2008). Organizational Behavior: Motivation Concepts. Washington DC: PHI.

Shah, K. & Shah, P.J. (2008). "Theories of Motivation." Referenced 18th February, 2010 from: http://www.laynetworks.com/Theories-of-Motivation.html

Mind Tools (2010) "Theory X and Theory Y: Understanding team member motivation" Referenced 18th February, 2010 from: http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_74.htm
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Theory X And Theory Y
Words: 1601 Length: 5 Document Type: Research Paper

Theory Y Theory X Theory X / Theory Y Theory X / Theory Y reflects Douglas McGregor's suggestion in The Human Side of Enterprise that managers tend to fall into two categories, in terms of how they see human nature. Theory X managers take a 'carrot and stick' approach when motivating subordinates. They assume that workers are inherently resistant to labor and will do all they can to avoid doing work so

Theory X And Theory Y Select Organizational
Words: 1763 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

Theory X and Theory Y Select organizational leaders analysis activity current research. Critique leader Douglas MacGregor's Theory X Theory Y Identify proper category leader assessment. Include examples situations actions reflect type leader . Theory X versus Theory Y: Apple vs. Google According to Douglas McGregor' analysis of managerial personality styles, managers fall into two basic 'types,' that of Theory X or Theory Y Theory X managers tend to exert authority through a traditional

Mcgregor's Theory X And Y: Douglas Mcgregor
Words: 1214 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

McGregor's Theory X and Y: Douglas McGregor developed Theory X and Theory Y as models in behavioral science approach after assessing the existing theories regarding people's behavior at when working. The theories, which have become significant concepts in understanding individuals' behaviors, describe two opposing opinions regarding human behavior at work. McGregor introduced these theories in mid-1940s and became one of the most famous behavioral theorists because of his significant contributions to

Theory X & Theory Y Douglas Mcgregor's
Words: 616 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Theory X & Theory Y Douglas McGregor's Theory X Theory Y are a set of dichotomous views about human nature that guide management. Theory X holds that humans generally dislike work, are irresponsible and require close supervision to do their jobs; Theory Y holds that humans are generally industrious, creative and able to assume responsibility (eNotes, 2006). These theories are said to guide management styles, because they imply that the role

Theory X Versus Theory Y Assumptions
Words: 1293 Length: 5 Document Type: Research Paper

Theory X and Theory Y When working with people, regardless of the organization, one must be cognizant of the way individuals are motivated. Motivation, in fact, is one of the basic driving forces that allow individuals to work, change, and even actualize their internal and external goals. Much of the background on motivation is based on the work of Maslow, not only surrounding human needs, but the manner in which those

Mcgregor Theory X And Y Douglas Mcgregor
Words: 723 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

Mcgregor Theory X and Y Douglas McGregor came up with two contrasting theories in 1960 that he called Theory X and theory Y for lack of a more suitable title. These two theories have had a profound impact on management studies as they tend to focus on managerial approaches which are grounded in certain beliefs and attitude towards the employees. These two theories should not be confused as being the two extremes

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now