The 5th and 14th Amendment Due Process
The concept of due process is one of the important principles in the United States Constitution and judicial process. It is an old notion that started vaguely in the Magna Carta of England (Kohn, 2013). In the U.S. Constitution, the due process clause is in the 5th and 14th amendments. The due process clause in the U.S. Constitution requires fundamental procedural fairness and the respect of an individuals legal rights by the state. Under the 5th and 14th amendments, due process is classified into two i.e. procedural due process and substantive due process. The due process doctrine has been the subject of numerous judicial considerations including in the Matthews v. Eldridge case. This paper examines this case in terms of whether it provides sufficient guidelines for a court to ascertain whether procedural due process has been properly provided.
The Matthews v. Eldridge Case
As noted by Kohn (2013), Matthews v. Eldridge is one of the 20th Century cases relating to the doctrine of due process. George Eldridge was a beneficiary of Social Security disability benefits from June 1968 due to chronic anxiety and back strain. Eldridge was later found to have diabetes and was informed by a letter from the state agency that his disability status was ending and his benefits would be terminated in May 1972. Eldridge responded by stating that he had arthritis of the spine and not a strained back. He also stated his belief that the state agency had sufficient information to establish his disability. However, the state agency upheld its decision, which was also accepted by the Social Security Administration (SSA). SSA notified him that his benefits would end after a month and his right of reconsideration by the agency within 6 months. Eldridge challenges the constitutionality of the termination of his benefits at the district court on grounds that due process was not followed based on the Fifth Amendment. SSA procedures provided for sufficient notification and evidentiary hearing prior to a final determination....
…administrative procedures proved that procedural due process was followed in terminating Eldridges Social Security disability benefits.The three-part balancing test announced by the Supreme Court that must be applied by lower courts in analysis cases on procedural due process provides sufficient guidelines. Matthews test provides sufficient guidelines for courts to determine procedural due process issues by promoting holistic and objective analysis. In this case, the courts consider the various administrative processes before ruling on whether due process was violated. These guidelines ensure that courts adopt a holistic view and approach rather than rely on only one or some parts of the administrative procedures.
In conclusion, due process is one of the important clauses and principles in the U.S. Constitution as established in the Fifth and Fourteenth amendments. Due process, which is classified into procedural and substantive due process, has been the subject of several cases and legal disputes such as the Matthews v. Eldridge case. While the lower courts ruled in favor of Eldridge, the Supreme Court overturned the ruling. The Court announced…
References
Kohn, R.E. (2013). Due process of law in private civil litigation: Is there anything new to say about it? (Yes, there is). The Federal Lawyer, 58-73.
Law Library. (n.d.). Matthews v. Eldridge Test. Retrieved November 22, 2021, from https://law.jrank.org/pages/8480/Mathews-v-Eldridge-Test.html
Mikula, M.F., Mabunda, L.M. & Marion, A.M. (1999). Matthews v. Eldridge. Retrieved November 22, 2021, from https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/greatcourts/mathews_v_eldridge/0?institutionId=5865
Due Process and the Significance of Interpretation The concept of "Due Process" is a uniquely American one, the significance of which has changed as much as has the societal and political times of the American nation. Today, some critics argue that Due Process is a thing of the past, what with the passing and signing into law of the National Defense Authorization Act, which authorizes the military to arrest and detain
In modern criminal procedure and practice, the Sixth Amendment also provides specific requirements of police, such as where criminal defendants express the desire to consult legal counsel. Irrespective of whether or not such a request precedes or follows the common recitation of Miranda warnings by arresting authorities, the Supreme Court has now long-regarded any expression of request for legal counsel as the immediate cut-off point of any further questioning (Colon, 2004;
The goal of modern constitutional criminal procedure is to define principles of law enforcement that protect citizens from government intrusions that are unreasonable in their effect on personal liberties, while simultaneously facilitating the reasonable enforcement of law and protection of society by prosecuting and punishing criminal conduct. One of the first principles in early American constitutional history was the idea that it was more beneficial to society and its citizens to
This 'law and order' approach, however, will tend to invoke discomfort amongst civil libertarians, who will object to the danger that this poses to the constitution. Accordingly, we consider the Due Process Model of criminal justice, which U.S. Legal (2010) identifies as a mode of administration which emphasizes procedural regularity, adherence to the terms of the Constitution and meaningful commitment to the notion of innocent until proven guilty. As USLegal
Due Process and the 14th Amendment Which of the protections available to criminal offenders through the Bill of Rights do not currently apply to the states? "Like the rest of the Bill of Rights, the Fourth Amendment originally only applied in federal court. However, in Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the rights guaranteed by the text of the Fourth Amendment…apply equally in state courts
Due Process Clause Fourteenth Amendment is Important to Me Adopted in 1868 to the U.S. Constitution during the Reconstruction era the Fourteenth amendment is known as one of the three Reconstruction Amendments. Of these three, the Fourteenth is the most complex and resulted in the greatest number of unforeseen effects. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment States "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now