This idea was considered to be logical and reasonable, in contrast to ideas such as the Divine Right of Kings, which stressed that a king was ordained by God to be the ruler, and thus could not be opposed by his subjects. Jefferson suggests that there is a social contract between the ruled and the ruler, and when the ruler is abusive and transgresses the right of the ruled, the ruled should be able to throw off that yolk, regardless of custom and historical precedent.
While it is true that Jefferson does call the King a "tyrant," when he does so he immediately lists practical grievances, to show that this abuse is not hurled without some justification (Jefferson 118). For example: "He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly and continually for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people" (Jefferson 118). Rather than dealing with the colonists, the King has merely used his power in an arbitrary fashion. It is true that Jefferson's document lacks self-consciousness about some of the abuses perpetrated by the colonists. Jefferson agreed to strike out any references to the slave trade, despite his statements of universal equality of all men, based upon the protests of some of the Southern states. Jefferson himself was a slave owner. But as he understood rationalism (with a heavy dose of pragmatism), the document was worded in as rationalistic a manner as possible, so even idealistic notions such as inalienable rights were presented in terms of an argument, and in reference to specific events.
Q4. In Jonathan Edwards' "Sinners in the hands of an angry God," the Puritan philosopher and preacher Jonathan Edwards stresses that the will of God alone protects the vulnerable, sinful human soul -- nothing else. Foolishly, people take refuge from fear in their healthy constitutions but that is only because they cannot see the gaping pit of hell beneath...
Mary Rowlandson & Increase Mather Readers of Mary Rowlandson's narrative of Indian capitivity within the Puritan colonization of Massachussetts may very well wonder at what Increase Mather's influence on the original text was. It is now widely agreed by scholars that the preface to the book is Mather's work -- and his official imprimatur may very well have contributed to the remarkable popularity of Rowlandson's work. As testament to the popularity
In addition to serving as a "religious confessional" that allows readers to understand the cultural gap between the Native Americans and the English, Rowlandson includes many details that can classify her work as a "visceral thriller," details that continue to expand on the theme of differences, or a gap, between the two cultures. She does this primarily through her descriptions of Native American cruelty -- most poignantly and passionately in
Even though some of the Indians were kind to her, she never changes her mind about them, and never gives them the benefit of the doubt, even when they ransom her and keep their word about taking her home. Mary's faith carried her through her ordeal, and helped after she returned to her husband, as well. Eventually, both her son and daughter were ransomed, and the family moved to Boston,
Celia Rowlandson American history includes a wide variety of women who have been involved with heroic acts. Two of these historic figures are Mary Rowlandson, a New England Puritan kidnapped by Indians in the 1700s, and Celia, an African-American slave who was hanged for killing her brutal master. Although their stories are very different, they demonstrated the personal fortitude to personally handle the worst of situations. Rowlandson was living in a Massachusetts
Christianity Upon Mary Rowlandson's Captivity Narrative And Frederick Douglass's Slave Narrative Both A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson and Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass are first-person nonfictional accounts of the individual's encounter with an 'other' that captures them and holds them hostage. Rowlandson's 17th century narrative tells of her abduction by Native Americans during King Phillips' War and her eventual return to white
It is evident that in his case, he tried to improve his condition by looking at his captors as providing him with guidance, and it is in this perception that Equiano's journey becomes meaningful, both literally and symbolically, as he eventually improved his status in life by educating himself after being a free man. Bozeman (2003) considered Equiano's experience as beneficial and resulted to Equiano's changed worldview at how he
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now