Verified Document

Marbury V. Madison Is An Research Paper

Although each State had its own State Constitution and a Judiciary tasked with upholding the Constitution, State laws that violated the Federal Constitution could be overturned by a Federal court. The Power of the Judiciary Relative the Legislative and Executive Branches

The Framers of the Constitution viewed the Judiciary as a Check on the other two branches, not necessarily as a dynamic force in itself. In the Federalist Paper No. 78, James Madison wrote that "…the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution . . . [it] may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments." (Federalist No. 78)

Although the Framers believed that the Judiciary was meant to have a limited role, it did appear, as Justice Marshall implied, that the Supreme Court was meant to be the mouthpiece for the Constitution. "A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought, of course, to be preferred; or, in other words, the Constitution ought to be preferred to the statute, the intention of the people to the intention of their agents." (Federalist No. 78)

The Judiciary and its Relationship with the Popular Electorate

The Judiciary is the only branch of the Federal Government not popularly elected. The Federal Judiciary is appointed by the President, the head of the Executive Branch. The appointment must also gain the approval of Congress before becoming effective. However, at no point in the process does the popular electorate have a say. In a very important sense, the Judiciary can be seen as the least democratic of the three branches of government.

The insulation of the Supreme Court from popular opinion is unsettling when one considers that the Supreme Court has the power to strike down the laws of a popularly elected Congress. This creates the possibility that the popular electorate has no say in a critical phase of the legislative process. For example, if there were a very activist Supreme Court which overturned many laws that...

This is contrasted with the power of the electorate to remove members of Congress when those members vote for laws which are unpopular with that particular electorate.
Although the notion of a branch of government insulated from the popular electorate sounds undemocratic, it is undemocratic in the context of a pure Democracy. Pure democracies, such as the democracy of ancient Athens, functioned through popular assemblies where citizens would vote yay or nay on initiatives, such as an initiative to raise taxes or go to war. However, the popular assemblies of these pure democracies were vulnerable to manipulation and often made foolish decisions out of fear or anger.

Through the intention of the Framers, the United States is not a pure Democracy, but a Republic. In the context of political philosophy, Republics differ from pure Democracies in that Republics use appointed or elected representatives for certain government functions instead of popular electorate. Republics are meant to curb the worst excesses of pure democracies, arising from the misinformation, self-interest, and short-sightedness of the popular electorate.

The Supreme Court is a distinctly Republican type of institution because it is largely independent of the popular electorate. More importantly, the members of the Federal Judiciary are meant to be selected for their technical competence, not their popularity or political views and affiliations. The Federal Courts are meant to be staffed by expert Jurists, not partisan politicians. In this way, the Supreme Court is designed to look after the integrity and long-term interests of the United States even when the popular electorate, through the other branches of government, isn't.

Conclusion

The power of the Supreme Court today might surprise some of the Framers of the Constitution had they been around to see it. The Supreme Court has great influence on law and policy in the United States. Furthermore, the Supreme Court has become more and more partisan over the years, with unabashedly Liberal Justices and Conservative Justices. Thus, the legacy of Marbury v. Madison is as conspicuous now as it was over 200 years ago.

Bibliography

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

The United States Constitution

The Federalist No. 78

Sources used in this document:
Bibliography

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

The United States Constitution

The Federalist No. 78
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Legislative Process
Words: 1078 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

legislation from the point of conception to actual bill language, to legislative assignment and review, consideration by Assembly and/or Senate, and becoming law is a multi-faceted process that consists of several specific steps. Given the complicated nature of this process, it sometimes frustrates stakeholders in light of time consumed, probable constant revisions of the language, and issues that may arise in different legislative committees and special interest groups. Consequently,

Legislative Process in the Upper House of
Words: 4006 Length: 15 Document Type: Essay

Legislative Process in the Upper House of Parliament As Bahrain searches for viable approaches to diversifying its oil-based economy, the relatively small nation, like many of its larger counterparts, is also faced with a number of engineering and logistical challenges in its parliamentary legislative process. To determine how the legislative process is being administered in Bahrain, this paper provides a review of the relevant literature to evaluate the challenges facing

Legislative Process Federal Mandates Are Orders From
Words: 600 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Legislative Process Federal mandates are orders from a central government that require compliance by state and local governments and individuals. Many times, mandates are signed into law "without the federal funds to support their execution" (Zaretsky 5). Additionally, mandates can be divided into different categories and require compliance by different agencies, companies, or individuals. One fairly recent mandate stems from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), which was signed

Legislative Process and California
Words: 624 Length: 2 Document Type: Creative Writing

Nurse Staffing Levels Through a Legislative Process Despite arguments from critics who argue that mandated nurse staff levels will adversely affect the skill mix of nurses, the experiences of states that have implemented this solution clearly indicate that this alternative represents a timely approach to a nationwide issue. To determine the facts, this paper reviews the literature to identify the respective pros and cons of mandating nurse staffing through a

Realizing an Effective Legislative Process
Words: 580 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Criminal Justice DQ The legislative process is effective in the administration of justice. Conservative lobby groups define proper legislation processes as inclusive governance that promotes inclusiveness of people in decision-making and policy formulation. Constant consultation with the citizenry allows the leaders to articulate interests of citizens. The legislation promotes controlled development and prudent allocation of resources among the diverse elements of the society and consecutive implementation of the laws and regulations

U.S. Legislative Process for Many People Around
Words: 548 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

U.S. Legislative Process For many people around world, the United States Congress stands as the most admirable example of democracy at work. In this political arena, solons supposedly share ideas, discuss their constituencies' needs and engage each other in debate. Through this process, the legislative body is supposed to produce just and fair laws that further the country's democratic ideals. In reality, however, political insiders know that the legislative process is

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now