Verified Document

Mapp V. Ohio Over The Centuries, There Essay

Mapp V. Ohio Over the centuries, there has been considerable debate as to the application of the Bill of Rights when it comes to the states. This is because a series of court cases decided it was only relevant when it came to the federal government (i.e. Barron v. Baltimore and United States v. Cruickshank). However, with the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment, these states were obligated to follow them. This has shifted the debate as to if this aspect of the Constitution is relevant to state and local officials. To determine if this is correct requires examining a fictional case in contrast with Mapp V. Ohio. This will be accomplished by carefully studying the facts of the case, the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine (under Mapp V. Ohio), the application of the rule of law and discussing how this would affect the ruling from the fictitious scenario. Together, the elements will highlight the way the Bill of Rights is applicable. ("Barron V. Baltimore," 2007) ("U.S.V. Cruickshank," 2010)

State the facts that are relevant and not relevant in the fact pattern

In the fictional case, Detective Mark Quick Draw is using a confidential informant to provide him with information about Sally Martin. Her address is known for being a drug house and it is believed that this kind of activity is occurring at the location. To confirm this Quick Draw sends in his confidential informant. He returns 20 minutes later with some cocaine. They subsequently tell the police that there is a rectangular looking package sitting in an open garbage bag and number of scales. The combination...

However, he is in the middle of a legal proceeding and the warrant will be delayed by an hour. Outside of the location, Detective Quick Draw continues to see people coming and going. After watching this several times, he immediately calls for uniform backup and raids the location. During the search they do not uncover evidence of a major drug operation. As the package is nothing more than trash and there are no scales anywhere. Instead, the police discover a large bag of heroin in her night stand. Sally is a convicted felon, who is not allowed to have these kinds of substance. She is subsequently charged and her attorney has filed a motion to suppress the evidence.
What are the rules of law stated in Mapp v. Ohio? Be sure to address the exclusionary rule and the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine

In Mapp V. Ohio, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that any kind of search must be in accordance with Fourth Amendment for the states and local jurisdictions. This is because the Fourteenth Amendment states that everyone is entitled to due process of law. As a result, the entire Bill of Rights is applicable to them (in order to be in compliance with these provisions). If any kind violation of the Fourth Amendment occurs (such as: an illegal search and seizure), the court has the ability to correct these oversights. ("The Fourth Amendment and the Exclusionary Rule," 2012) ("Mapp V.…

Sources used in this document:
References

Barron V. Baltimore. (2007). Constitution.org. Retrieved from: http://constitution.org/ussc/032-243a.htm

The Fourth Amendment and the Exclusionary Rule. (2012). Find Law. Retrieved from: http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-rights/the-fourth-amendment-and-the-exclusionary-rule.html

Mapp V. Ohio. (2010). Cornell School of Law. Retrieved from: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0367_0643_ZO.html

US V. Cruickshank. (2010). Find Law. Retrieved from: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=92&invol=542
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Mapp Vs Ohio Case
Words: 1000 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

The complainant in the Mapp v. Ohio case, DollreeMapp, was detained following a law enforcement search of her house to find an outlaw she was supposedly giving refuge to. After a number of entry refusals by the complainant, Cleveland’s Police Department apparently forged a warrant to inspect her home and forced their way into it. While they couldn’t find any outlaw hidden there, they did stumble upon lascivious and lewd

Exclusionary Rule in Terry Vs Ohio
Words: 1023 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Supreme Court Bill of Rights Case Terry v. Ohio introduce the Terry frisk into police procedure, allowing officers to have the right to stop and frisk or do a surface search of individuals on the street even without probable cause. All the officer would need would be to have a reasonable suspicion that the person being searched had committed, was about to commit or was in the act of committing a

Exclusionary Rule Has Become a
Words: 4686 Length: 15 Document Type: Research Paper

The Court cited language from Boyd in support of its proposition. The Boyd Court had held that the Fourth and Fifth Amendments "apply to all invasions on the part of the government and its employees of the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life. It is not the breaking of his doors, and the rummaging of his drawers, that constitutes the essence of the offence; but

Constitutional Right to Privacy Recent
Words: 3049 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

In the case of Bowers v. Hardwick the United States Supreme Court failed to strike down Georgia's sodomy laws, as they applied to homosexuals, because rather than treat the matter as one of privacy rights, the court instead viewed the case from the perspective of whether there existed within the United States and its traditions, a right to engage in homosexual activity. In the Supreme Court's opinion, privacy in this

Exclusionary Rule Within the Scope
Words: 3684 Length: 12 Document Type: Term Paper

The U.S., however, is the only industrial democracy, common law or otherwise, in which courts must throw out tainted evidence in criminal trials. The U.S. Supreme Court decisions establishing and expanding on this principle have collectively come to be known as the "exclusionary rule." Although the rule had its origins in arguments about the morality of obtaining a conviction while relying on improperly obtained evidence, its primary modern justification

Search and Seizure Law, Known
Words: 3475 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

Further, these writs, once issued, could be reused, and did not expire until the death of the reigning monarch (Knappman, 33). In Massachusetts, a group of colonial merchants, represented by James Otis, petitioned the Superior Court to refuse any new applications of writ following the death of George II. Otis, using the phrase "A man's house is his castle," argued in the case that the writs were a direct violation

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now