Job Analysis and Design
Approaches the HR manager can take to conduct a job analysis of the Customer Service Representative position.
The completion of a competent job analysis is needed to outline the job description, the responsibilities of the position and the qualities the holder of the position is expected to have so that they are successful for in that position. Not using a job analysis makes it hard to fill vacant positions effectively (Prien, Goodstein, Goodstein & Gamble, Jr., 2009).
The various ways of carrying out a job analysis for the position of customer representative is as given below:
a) DACUM (Developing a Curriculum): This is a quick but valid technique for job analysis that is used in the determination of competencies that the team should focus on in the training curriculum for a given occupation. DACUMs are made use of in developing job profiles for all kinds of occupations as it saves both money and time. It has been validated by research and it compares very well with other methods used for job analysis. DACUM is grounded on the following premises:
Expert professionals are better at describing their work than any other person can do
Any position can be described effectively in terms of tasks and competencies that workers who are successful in that field do
The particular skills, tools, attitudes and specific knowledge that workers need to effectively do their job can be described (Halasz & Reid, 2003).
The process takes thinking deliberately in an organized way and needs about 5 to 9 workers who are experts in their field of work, a recorder and a DACUM facilitator. While some job analysis can be carried out in a single day, it is more prudent to schedule more than one day for those jobs that are complex. The members of the panel must be heavy hitters in their areas of expertise, and have excellent skills and knowledge. To achieve good outcomes, a facilitator with training in the DACUM process is needed. The first step is preparing a profile or chart that shows the duties and tasks the person seeking the position will do and the required general knowledge, skills, and tools. Following the development of the profile, it should undergo validation and expert workers as well as supervisors should review it for accuracy and completeness. Different criteria can be used in the process of validation, but a critical criterion is performance frequency and training needs (Halasz & Reid, 2003).
Advantages of the DACUM Method (Hartley, 1999):
Self-validation as verification is done by the experts in that particular area as well as the panel established.
It is proven to work for not less than 3 decades now.
It establishes a sense of ownership among the supervisors and managers as they design the training.
Disadvantages of the method (Hartley, 1999):
Listing all qualities and tasks the job requires is cumbersome.
It takes long to orient managers who are not certified to the terms used in such a process and nearly a quarter of the time is dedicated to this.
A session like the one mentioned above needs a certified DACUM facilitator. The concerned organization must therefore get certification from DACUM licensees.
b. Critical Incident Technique (CIT): A behavioral analysis is done on a phenomenon so as to identify the behavioral aspects of the job. The individuals directly in contact with the phenomenon or who feel the effects of the behavior give the needed information. Data may be obtained from workshops or interviews (Scott & Reynolds, 2010). There are four characteristics to a good incident:
Specificity
Focus on behavior that is observable
Description of the behavior's context
Highlights the consequences that accrue due to the behavior
The method involves asking experts in the job to give stories of poor or good performance so that specific undesirable or desirable behaviors and competencies can be identified. Since the focus is not on the typical but extreme undesirable or desirable behavior, the method is not typically made use of (Condrey, 2010). The basic steps made use of in this method are the generation of lists by competent workers of notable incidents, categorization of the incidents considered to be critical into various dimensions, and once the dimensions are validated, they are reported and also defined by the incidents deemed critical and then recorded (Condrey, 2010). For every incident, every participant is requested to give a description of:
Circumstances preceding that particular incident
The exact deed considered unhelpful or helpful
The reason the behavior is considered unhelpful
An approximation of the time the incident took place (Scott & Reynolds, 2010).
Advantages of CIT method (Ngo, 2010):
The data collected is in the respondent's own words and the respondent is not forced to use a certain framework.
Focus on extraordinary or unusual can yield more helpful data.
It is flexible.
Not expensive but gives rich data.
It identifies those rare...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now