Man-Ana Forever
Jorge Castan-eda is a preeminent Mexican politician who has been advocating for years several major changes in his home country. He has consistently pointed out, both in speech and through writings, all the difficulties within Mexico and makes suggestions about how these disparages can be righted. Initially a Communist and advocate of leftist policies, Castan-eda has in more recent years been politically in the center of the road. This has stemmed from experience and the eventual understanding that no one side can be completely right all the time. There must be at some point a median ground where ideas can meet. He attempted to enter the political arena in Mexico through a third party and was disallowed from doing so by the Mexican Supreme Court. Consequently, his writings have been the means by which he has been able relate his ideas about how to improve Mexico. His most recent work, Man-ana Forever?: Mexico and the Mexicans Castan-eda explores some of the inconsistencies he has noted in the nation of Mexico and tries to explain why some of these perplexities exist. In so doing, Castan-eda asks the reader to understand the country in terms of its place in the physical and sociological order of the world. Throughout the world, nations far more impoverished than Mexico are being able to transform themselves economically and sociologically into stronger nations and burgeoning world powers. Yet Mexico for the most part has remained stagnant in its context with the rest of the world. In the book, Castan-eda tells the world about the strife and difficulties in Mexico and by doing begs the country to change.
In his newest book Man-ana Forever Jorge Castan-eda tries to define something indefinable; that is what it means to be a Mexican citizen. More so than many other countries, Mexico's citizens are consumed by what they understand to be their communal identity. A country's identity is defined by its nationalism, its own understanding of itself as a country. He writes:
National identity is a concept that defines a nation unto itself, in an ontological, historical, fundamental manner: it is what makes a nation…a nation. National character is, partly, how a national society views itself, and how it is viewed by others. Some societies identify their national "uniqueness" with their national "character," as opposed to their history, their religion, their creed, their language, or their ethnic origins (Castan-eda).
This definition must be properly understood in terms of the Mexican culture and heritage. Many countries are defined by their national identities, but few are as all-consumed with this identity as Mexico seems to be. Compare this with the idea of a national character which is simpler and easier to change with time. Most countries have national character points that outnumber the components that comprise their national identity. For Mexico, national identity is the preeminent factor. For Castan-eda, this identification is disruptive and prohibits the country from any chance at growth.
For more than seventy years, the country of Mexico has been dominated by the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI). Those who belong to this party are likely to obtain positions within the government, even if they are severely and supremely under qualified. In Man-ana Forever, author Castan-eda relates his personal experiences during the 1988 presidential election in Mexico. During that election, candidate Cuauhtemoc Cardenas seemed to be the likely winner for the presidency. He had a lot of ground support from the citizenry and it looked as though he would have no trouble securing the office. However, in a result that surprised many, he was defeated officially by Carlos Salinas de Gortari, the candidate supported by the PRI. Castan-eda attempted to lead his fellow Mexicans to investigate the balloting and demand it to be conclusively shown that Gortari had won the election legally. This was not done, of course and it put Castan-eda on the outs with the powerful PRI. The cardenistas in one of the locations that were disputed, who were responsible for checking the ballots and ensuring the legality of the elections, would not even investigate the possibility of deception out of their fear of the PRI. The behavior of these cardenistas was not an isolated incident. Their fear of the more powerful party was reflected in other groups as well. This too was merely a reflection of the history...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now