LOOP
Balancing loop and Reinforcing Loop
Understanding how systems works constitute one of the most challenging aspects of information technology irrespective of the significance of the phenomena. The aspects of structures and how they are associated with systems is essentially one decisive factor. The way in which various components influence one another depends on the way structures are instituted within a system. Thus, structures are the main determinants of relationships between components. The processes of looping clearly indicate these trends and serve generally to indicate the interaction between productivity with the view of adding to the finished goods inventory. As a matter of fact, this process indicates instances where resources are added or subtracted within certain tasks. The two kinds of looping systems in Information Technology are the balancing loop and the reinforcing loop, all of which are classified into a number of categories. These loops are found in various applications like Skype, a package which enables operators to communicate with one another through the use of VoIP capabilities. These feedback loops are vital for the functioning of Skype, in addition to facilitating its success. Further, they affect each other as they perform and helped Skype generate organizational learning among other things.
Balancing Loop
This feedback loop serves to move states from their current condition to the desired states through the application of some actions. A balancing loop is demonstrative of any condition where there is an objective, which is achieved by the use of some actions. The loop helps in facilitating increments of certain objects or generating new products, a process referred to as the creation of the balancing loop. This loop has a number of instances within it. In the process of creation of a new state, the balancing loop goes through a series of events. For instance, a gap is produced during the instance of interaction between the current state and the desired state (Bellinger, 2004). Balancing loop acts towards the movement of unique, current state or status quo, to the goal or target standard (desired state) through a selected medium or means. This sums the behavioral action of the balancing loop in the process of changing the condition to a better state. The reaction between the current and desired states results into generation of a gap. The objective or goal/desired state is fixed during the process. The gap is the main cause for action. It is, therefore, referred to as the motivational factor. The size of the gap determines the level of action to be implemented in consideration. The action supplements the current action in the process of execution. The size of the current state reduces because much subtraction occurs from the difference between the goal and the status quo.
During this moment of interaction, the desired state is seen as being in a fixed condition. In addition, the actions by which the changes of the state are achieved are motivated, and this is achieved through the difference, which is achieved between the current state and the desired state. Moreover, the degree of the gap determines the predisposition of the loop to generate some action. These two phenomena are directly proportional, and as such, the chances of an action being produced are increased with the increase in the size of the gap. The action is created during the interaction process hence augmenting the current state. At the same time, from the gap, something is subtracted by the current state and as a result, reducing from the gap. The gap is eventually abridged to null, and there occurs no motivation for an action to occur. This, however, happens only in instances where the action is successful in shifting the current state to a point where it is equivalent to zero. In facilitating successful completion of task in Skype, the balancing loop Guarantees the existence of a specific, easily comprehended and accepted characterization of the desired state. It also ensures that there exists an as impartial as possible description of the current state. The balancing loops furthermore facility the existence...
Loops Deckers Outdoor Corporation describes its business as being "a premier lifestyle marketer that builds niche brands into global market leaders by designing and marketing innovative, functional and fashion footwear" (Deckers 2011 Annual Report). Feedback loops were outlined as being an important component of the Burke-Litwin Causal Model (Falletta, 2008). A feedback loops is a set of elements that is self-reinforcing. There are basically two types of feedback loops, balancing
System Feedback Loops of Whole Foods Systems model use two basic feedback loops, so-called Balancing and Reinforcing loops, to illustrate the relationships between growth and goals. This paper identifies one Balancing Loop and one Reinforcing Loop that are critical to Whole Foods Market's performance and success. An explanation of each of these feedback loops, including the causal factors and how they affect each other, is followed by a discussion concerning an
Business Feedback Loops and Organizational Learning at Whole Foods Market To remain competitive and responsive to internal and external pressures, firm need to observe and monitor the outcomes of their activities (Mintzberg et al., 2011). Feedback loops explain the way in which processes may be maintained, or change takes place. In line with other businesses, Whole Food Markets cannot avoid the presence of feedback loops. When the feedback loops are recognized, they
Systemic thinking is the method used to deal with the complex problems and it is used to understand the relationships and pattern within the components of network of relationship. Traditionally, linear relationship focuses on the cause and effect where people view everything in a straight line. However, with interrelationship of dynamic organization and society, linear relationship is inadequate to address the societal and organizational complex problem and linear relationship is
Foreign Policy of China (Beijing consensus) Structure of Chinese Foreign Policy The "Chinese Model" of Investment The "Beijing Consensus" as a Competing Framework Operational Views The U.S.-China (Beijing consensus) Trade Agreement and Beijing Consensus Trading with the Enemy Act Export Control Act. Mutual Defense Assistance Control Act Category B Category C The 1974 Trade Act. The Operational Consequences of Chinese Foreign Policy The World Views and China (Beijing consensus) Expatriates The Managerial Practices Self Sufficiency of China (Beijing consensus) China and western world: A comparison The China (Beijing
Negotiation Skills A High Impact Negotiations Model: An Answer to the Limitations of the Fisher, Ury Model of Principled Negotiations This study aims to discover the ways in which blocked negotiations can be overcome by testing the Fisher, Ury model of principled negotiation against one of the researcher's own devising, crafted after studying thousands of negotiation trainees from over 100 multinational corporations on 5 continents. It attempts to discern universal applications of
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now