[17]
The aid package that Truman proposed and that was approved on May 22,
1947, by the U.S. Congress was valued at $400 million. Some sources state
that Greece was to receive $350 million and Turkey the remaining $50
million.[18] However, others suggest that the split was somewhat more even
with Greece receiving $300 million overall. The distribution of the money
as Truman intended it was to give Greece and equal amount in relief and
military supplies with $150 million going to each. Turkey was to receive
$100 million in arms and military advice.[19] The ability and willingness
of the United States to give this kind and amount of aid coupled with the
strategic purpose behind the package solidly put the United States in the
position of world superpower. Truman saw the necessity of winning Greece
from communism and the fact that he put so much on the line to do it shows
his and the U.S.'s willingness to act and take a world power position. The
isolationist policies of the past would no longer work in the growing
environment of the Cold War and the concern about spheres of influence in
Europe.[20]
Truman's timing could not have been better as the situation for the
Greek government was bleak in the spring of 1947. The Greek National Army
(GNA) began advancing on toward areas where the communist guerillas were
known to operate in April of that year. The drive through central Greece
heading north by the GNA was expected to be successful. It was assumed
that the guerillas would give in; they were even offered amnesty if they
surrendered. However, the army bogged down and became the victim of
ambushes and guerilla attacks. Frequently, the GNA could not tell who was
the enemy and who was not in the villages plus villagers often secretly
worked for the guerillas making life even more difficult for the legitimate
army and reducing the moral of the soldiers. The civil war mostly affected
the countryside and villages many of which were isolated with the cities
relatively safely held by the Greek government. Despite this, the economy
of the nation came to a stop as it was largely agricultural.[21]
The communist backed guerillas were able to work in the mountainous
areas in small groups of 70-100 men and cripple the central government by
cutting off access to supplies and roads. The guerilla forces were
receiving assistance from outside sources from Yugoslavia, Albania, and
Bulgaria all of which would have been pro-Soviet, communist countries at
the time. These countries were helping to train and supply the guerillas
in Greece.[22] It was clearly not a fair fight. The Truman Doctrine
served to sway the fight to the side of the legitimate government. The
Greek government was beginning to get more general support due to the death
of King George II. His brother, Paul I, came to the throne and was a more
active and political person than his brother. Paul was also more well
liked in his country and more respected as a political player by the United
States.[23]
The first wave of American military advisors arrived in Greece on May
24, 1947. They were known as the United States Army Group Greece (USAGG).
"USAGG immediately began studying the equipment needs of the Greek
army, air force, and gendarmerie. By mid July USAGG had cut Greek
General Staff requirements from forty million dollars to sixteen
million dollars, established an integrated relationship with the
British and Greeks, and made recommendations for supplies and
operations."[24]
The USAGG was able to gain administrative control relatively quickly and
easily. However, a new concern was mounting.
The British wanted to pull their remaining 5000 troops from Greece as
they were needed at home for re-construction. Truman and his
administration were reluctant to commit U.S. troops in a foreign situation
such as this. Additionally, the U.S. military had shrunk considerably in
size following the end of World War II. Truman would have to pull soldiers
from other assignments to send to Greece. Pouring U.S. soldiers into
Greece may also appear like an act of war against the Soviet Union which
would further complicate the political atmosphere. In the end Truman
decided against sending in U.S. soldiers and imposed two other measures
that would help the GNA be successful against the guerillas. These were
increasing the size of the GNA and putting U.S. Army officers with Greek
units to assist them in their decisions.[25]
With this new plan in mind, the U.S. began moving in 74,000 tons of
military equipment in the second half of 1947. These supplies included
things like artillery, dive bombers, and napalm. Furthermore, 250 officers
took up advisory positions with the Greek army.[26] The leader of the U.S.
intervention, General James Van Fleet "started a policy-standard in dealing
with popular insurrections of forcibly removing thousands of Greeks from
their homes in the countryside, to try to isolate...
(Wallerstein 2002, p. 51). Russia suffered many of the problems that were prevalent in other cultures where capitalism could have beenimagined to develop. Like Japan, Russia had a centralized government that controlled society and eliminated any chance of private enterprise and limited the ownership of land. It was not until the Revolution of 1905 that the serfs attained true freedom. (Figes 2002, p. 331). Afterwards, the nation was dominated by
United States & United Kingdom Western Europe Politics International Relations: The United States & United Kingdom The purpose of this paper is to examine the close relationship between the United States and United Kingdom and attempt to determine the roots of these strong bonds from a time when the U.S. was still a British Colony to present day. Further this work will explain why this bond in essence forces the British to go along
Terrorism in Western Europe That terrorism, be it transnational or domestic, impacts negatively on the overall well-being of economies is a well-known fact. With that in mind, governments have overtime embraced numerous counterterrorism measures in an attempt to mitigate the adverse effects of terrorist activities. In this text, I concern myself with terrorism in Western Europe. In so doing, I will limit my discussion to two countries in Western Europe where
Economic development of Eastern and Western Europe over the course of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries obviously differed, but not to the extent that historians or economists have frequently imagined. Put simply, the economic histories of Eastern and Western Europe are frequently viewed according to either region's differing political organizations, with the capitalist West opposed to the Communist East, but in reality, the period of time defined by the rise
9. The conflict between Gregory VII and Henry IV is referred to as the Investiture Controversy. The 11th century dispute between the Pope and the Holy Roman Emperor was centered on who would have the right to appoint church officials i.e. investiture. The stake of this conflict was of course, money in the form of simony i.e. The sale of Church offices, as well as the amount of money that
Moreover, without instituting the plan, without the United States putting its currency where its rhetoric was, it is unlikely that Europe would have accepted the so-called Truman Doctrine later on as willingly as it did, or the status of NATO and the United Nations as anti-communist and peacekeeping forces dominated by the United States. The Truman Doctrine began with Greece, but was later invoked in the Berlin Airlift and
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now