Marijuana Recently, Uruguay became the first country to legalize in its entirety and without qualification the marijuana trade. Uruguayan senators spent a total of twelve hours debating the issue, which was proposed by the country's President. The bill was described by its proponents as "an unavoidable response to reality, given that the 'war' on drugs had failed" (BBC, 2013, 1). The law allows registered citizens to buy up to 40g per month. The law is the first of what could be many as South American nations in particular are coming to the realization that drug prohibition, backed by American interests with the support of the United Nations, has left the continent with powerful and violent gangs that control the trade, while doing nothing to stem consumption (Ibid). Indeed, the UN has already weighed in by stating that Uruguay's legislation is in contravention of the international treaties that are enforced by the International Narcotics Control Board (BBC, 2013, 2).

The reality is, however, that the UN has no coherent drug policy. People like to get high, and they will find a way to consume. It is demand that drives drug markets, not supply. The "war on drugs" is a failed policy that has done nothing to affect demand. The result of this war is higher crime rates around the world, the incarceration of people for mere possession or consumption, a loss of tax revenues, and the creation of violent drug gangs, just as happened during alcohol Prohibition. Chokshi (2013) notes that several U.S. states have some form of legalized marijuana, including legalization in Washington and Colorado. The move is on to find the best ways to legalize the production, consumption and sale of this plant, and not a moment too soon. These states, Uruguay and other pioneers will be the test subjects for the legal trade in marijuana, with many nations both in the West and in Latin America looking for the best pathways to legalization (Gray, 2013).

Marijuana should be legalized in the United States, because its prohibition has been a complete failure on every conceivable level. On a criminal level, prohibition merely creates more criminals -- some imaginary like users and some very real and very violent like the gangs who earn their profits from marijuana. On an economic level, prohibition costs law enforcement millions and denies tax dollars to governments. On a social level, prohibition has not done a thing to stem consumption. When the UN throws arguments out there like "this endangers young people and contributes to the earlier onset of addiction," it has no facts whatsoever to back these claims up. The people standing against marijuana prohibition do not deal with facts, only anger and arguments. One cannot be a reasonable, rational person and stand against the legalization of marijuana.

The Crime Argument

The first thing that needs to be stated outright is that marijuana users are not criminals until the law defines them as such. In the absence of other crimes, drug use or possession itself is not a valid measure of the crimes relating to drug use. What does matter is the crimes that the war on drugs creates that are genuine crimes, in that they would always be considered to be crimes no matter what the drug policy is. In almost all cases, this is the gang warfare that arises when rival factions fight for control of an illegal substance. When companies fight for control over a legal substance, it is called competition and its rules are clearly governed in the trade laws of the nation. Firms tend to stick within these laws, and transgressions are usually mild in nature. When the commodity is illegal, this inherently reframes the nature of competition as one between lawless entities. The folk saying "in for a penny, in for a pound" applies. When your entire business is illegal, the use of other illegal acts to manage your business is not off the table. Thus, we have gang violence to control the drug trade. Since the war on drugs began, gangs became more prominent, and they were directly involved in the trade of crack cocaine (Howell & Decker, 1999). Violence increased significantly, and was related to competition for market...

Their reasoning, however, holds no basis in reality. They point out that gang violence is often the result of inter-gang conflict, without ever asking why the gangs were in conflict. They will fight one another over territorial disputes, and the CDC recognized that, but never questioned why there were territorial disputes. The underlying factor of course is money. Gangs are organized criminal entities, and they are in business. Drugs are the main business. So when gangs are fighting each other over turf, it is a fight over market share for all illegal activities, of which drugs just happen to be a major part, just as Howell & Decker (1999) note. The legislators in Uruguay must have been using different information than the CDC, because they came to an entirely different conclusion.
While in the United States there are certainly many different drugs and many other non-drug ways to make money illegally, a cleaner experiment is taking place in Latin America, which is a main supplier of marijuana to the U.S. market. Violence tied to the drug trade is common, and the fact that it is more common along northern conduit routes to the United States is particularly telling. Licon (2013) notes that drug violence in Mexico is open, and with a weak legal system threatens to disrupt the country both socially and economically. That the prohibition on marijuana has outsourced this death and mayhem does not recuse the government for its part in the promotion of this violence. Worse, attempts to promote aggressive law and order policies as a response to the increased crime are entirely ineffective. This is because such approaches do nothing to address the root problem, which is not consumption of marijuana but the illegality of it.

Prohibition spurring gang violence is nothing new, of course. It happened with alcohol as well. When there are no legal avenues for the production and sale of a commodity, but that commodity remains in high demand, that leads to an illegal market. The legal market for marijuana is going to be worth an estimated $2.34 billion in 2014, with the illegal market worth much more, since so few states have legalized it (Schwartz, 2013). This does not mean that legalizing is causing a bump in marijuana usage, just that more usage is being recorded as it becomes legal.

It is also worth considering what the effects of criminalization are in America. Since the war on drugs began, America's prison population has surged as drug convictions have increased from 15 per 100,000 adults in 1980 to 148 in 1996. 1.328 million Americans were arrested for possession -- not always of marijuana but often -- in 2009 alone. The introduction of mandatory sentencing for even minor possession convictions has created a new prison industry, where powerful prison companies now lobby governments to continue with stringent sentencing guidelines, mindful that they need growing prison populations in order to satisfy the needs of their shareholders for growth (Zakaria, 2012). The effort to criminalize possession and small-time trafficking is not even being driven by public safety arguments by the need to fuel the burgeoning prison industry. Not surprisingly, these prisons are being filled with people from disadvantaged communities, who often have little voice with which to fight back. And that takes a tremendous social toll.

The Social Argument

The social argument in favor of prohibition is an argument about the destructive effects of drugs. The UN threw the word addiction out there in its condemnation of Uruguay. Historically, there is little evidence to suggest that marijuana is particularly addictive, especially when compared with legal substances like alcohol, tobacco or even controlled prescription drugs. There is evidence that marijuana is becoming more addictive, even when controlled for the number of marijuana users in the population (Compton et al., 2004). The authors of this study note that the most likely cause for increasing addiction is an increase in the THC content of marijuana. This phenomenon is not unlike the dangers associated with bootleg liquor. Moonshine is high potency and the most destructive, allowing users to maximize their consumption of an illegal substance per unit of risk (each transaction represents risk). Most users would prefer low THC rates but sometimes have no real choice. A legalized market would allow people to make smarter choices with respect to their THC intake, and that would reduce instances of marijuana addiction, which are already fairly low.

There are other social costs as well. When gang violence becomes too destructive, it tears apart communities. Entire towns in Mexico have…