Verified Document

Legal Brief Of O'Neill V. Montefiore Essay

O'Neill v. Montefiore Hospital Case Summary

The case of Mr. O'Neill and his widow's case against Montefiore Hospital is a fairly basic one but it poses a very relevant and pointed question. The question becomes where the line is drawn between the duty to provide care and when the patient is basically on their own despite any bad things that may happen. The decision on this case was a split decision, so this drives the point home even further that the details and duties in question in this case are far from being clear-cut and defined and this is in part based on what did happen, what did not happen, what allegedly happened and what allegedly did not happen (Leagle, 2015).

The gist of the case is that Mr. O'Neill was awake and rubbing his chest and arms due to having pain in both of those areas. His wife awoke and noticed this and the decision was quickly made to get to the hospital. The trek to the hospital had to be made by foot because no taxis and such were available. There was apparently no attempt made to call for an ambulance. In any event, the couple made it there alive and tried to receive...

The people for their "HIP" plan were not there but he got a hold of one of them on the phone. That person told him we would see him at 8 o'clock. Other than saying that he "might be dead" by that time, not much was discernible from the conversation from the hospital end. The "million dollar question" came down to whether the hospital refused to provide care of if O'Neill declined it. From all appearances, what happened is that the 8 o'clock offer was made and the patient refused it. He then left the hospital as this was apparently his only option and he fell dead just about as soon as he got home (Leagle, 2015).
Elements of Negligence

Duty to Care

There are two people, at least primarily, that are in question here as it relates to having a duty to provide care. The first person would be the nurse that saw and received the O'Neill couple at the hospital. The other would be the doctor who spoke on the phone to Mr. O'Neill about his plight (Leagle, 2015).

Breach of Duty

As can be inferred from the above, there is a question whether the nurse that was actually…

Sources used in this document:
References

Leagle. (2015). O'NEILL v. MONTEFIORE HOSP. | Leagle.com. Leagle.com. Retrieved 26 May 2015, from http://www.leagle.com/decision/196014311AD2d132

/ O%27NEILL%20v.%20MONTEFIORE%20HOSP.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Legal Brief: Hotjox Magazine Facts: Mark Studley
Words: 1257 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Legal Brief: Hotjox Magazine Facts: Mark Studley (Studley), an Olympic swimmer, was featured on the cover of Hotjox magazine, a magazine targeted primarily at gay males. The picture was in the public domain. The magazine cover had the headline "Olympic Hunks Exposed" and said, "12 Sizzling Centerfolds Ready to Score with You," "Holy Speedo! Hot Athletic Buns!" And "Mark Studley, Olympic 2000's Best Body." The only image of Studley inside the

Legal Brief: Anthony Labriola V. Pollard Group
Words: 448 Length: 2 Document Type: Research Paper

Legal Brief: Anthony Labriola v. Pollard Group Anthony Alan Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc., WA Supreme Court, 2004, No. 74002-0 Whether a 2002 noncompete agreement negotiated after the employee had been hired and without independent consideration is enforceable. SUBSTANTIVE FACTS: Five years after beginning employment as a sales person the employer required the employee sign a noncompete agreement in 2002. In exchange the employee was allowed to remain employed. After the noncompete agreement was signed

Legal Brief the Author Preparing This Brief
Words: 1426 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Legal Brief The author preparing this brief is asked to defend against the banning of a book on the grounds that it is obscene and thus it should be barred from sale and distribution in the public sphere. The laws and standards surrounding obscenity are vague, subjective and impossible to reliably and consistently enforce in a manner that is even-handed and objective. As such, the banning of a book, movie or

Sexual Harassment Legal Case Study
Words: 934 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

Legal Brief McCurdy v. Arkansas State Police, 375 F. 3 762 (8th Cir. 2004) Type of Action The case covered in this legal brief was the case of an employee of the Arkansas State Police, that being McCurdy, filing an action against the State of Arkansas in the form of the Arkansas State Police, that being her employer. Ms. McCurdy was trying to hold the Arkansas State Police liable for the sexual harassment

Legal Responsibilities and Rights of a Forensic Psychologist
Words: 3466 Length: 9 Document Type: Research Paper

The participants aren't given the right to access the records of forensic scientists. The consent of the concerned party is needed first. A fee is charged for recording keeping purposes. Accessing the third party evidence requires approval of the attorney and concerned party. The forensic professionals should be able to protect the identity of the confidential individuals and present the information in a balanced manner. The information concerned is of importance

Legal Memo
Words: 1075 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Legal Memorandum Natalie Attired Unemployment Compensation Claim. STATEMENT OF FACTS The client in this case, Natalie Attired is 23 years of age and is a high school graduate as well as having attended New Mexico State University but dropped out after one year and began waitressing. She has most recently been working for Biddy Baker, 60 years of age who has been in the restaurant business for more than 20 years. Every three

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now