Verified Document

Legal Brief: Hotjox Magazine Facts: Mark Studley Essay

Legal Brief: Hotjox Magazine Facts: Mark Studley (Studley), an Olympic swimmer, was featured on the cover of Hotjox magazine, a magazine targeted primarily at gay males. The picture was in the public domain. The magazine cover had the headline "Olympic Hunks Exposed" and said, "12 Sizzling Centerfolds Ready to Score with You," "Holy Speedo! Hot Athletic Buns!" And "Mark Studley, Olympic 2000's Best Body." The only image of Studley inside the magazine was a small fully-dressed quarter-page photo with an athletic profile of him and a quote he had previously given about trying to be a role model for children. The magazine did feature nude photos of male dancers. Studley filed suit against Hotjox alleging false light invasion of privacy. Studley maintained that the cover implied that he had voluntarily posed for the magazine and that this cost him endorsements and resulted in damage to his reputation. Hotjox argued that, as a public figure, Studley had to demonstrate actual malice. In deposition testimony associate editor Lance Ledoux stated that editor Justin Thyme had told them to make the issue sexier, but that he had objected because he believed that the headline would lead people to believe that Studley appeared nude in the magazine. The photo editor stated that it was their policy to specifically state if someone appeared nude in the magazine. The magazine was sold shrink-wrapped, so that a purchaser could not see the contents without buying the magazine.

Issues: Should the court grant summary judgment in favor of Hotjox? Did the magazine present information about or concerning Studley that was presented as factual but that was actually false or created a false impression bout him? Did the information state or imply something highly offensive that would have a tendency to injure Studley's reputation? What is false light invasion of privacy? Did a false light invasion of privacy occur in this...

"This tort is defined as putting a person in a false light before the public... The tort essentially states that a photo or story cannot be used if that photo or story conveys a false impression of someone" (Cooper, 2013). A false light invasion of privacy can be based upon either a positive or a negative falsehood. However, false light cases are judged by criteria established in Time, Inc. v. Hill, which determined that a plaintiff had to establish actual malice in order to win a false light invasion of privacy suit (Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374 (1967)). In Kaelin v. Globe Communications Corp. (9th Cir., 1998) 162 F.3d 1036, Kato Kaelin brought suit against the publisher of the National Examiner for a headline that suggested that he committed the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. In that case, the court found that the headline did not accurately reflect the content of the article that appeared later in the publication (162 F.3d 1037). Furthermore, the headline falsely insinuated that Kaelin committed the murders, and that insinuation was not necessarily remedied by the non-defamatory article that appeared later in the publication. In support of the Court's decision in that case, it cited testimony by one of the journalists that he believed that the headline might appear misleading to people (162 F.3d 1039). "The appropriate summary judgment question is whether a reasonable jury could find, by clear and convincing evidence" that a plaintiff has shown actual malice (162 F.3d 1039). To do that, the Court examined whether the headlines alone were susceptible of a false and defamatory meaning (162 F.3d 1039). Furthermore, these meanings are to be assessed from the standpoint of the average reader, rather than from…

Sources used in this document:
References

Cooper, J. (2013). Invasion of privacy- false light. Retrieved April 20, 2013 from Eastern

Michigan University website: http://www.emunix.emich.edu/~jcooper/emlaw/unit5_fl.html

Kaelin v. Globe Communications Corp. (9th Cir., 1998) 162 F.3d 1036.

Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374 (1967).
http://definitions.uslegal.com/a/actual-malice/
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Legal Briefs Case Briefs Cook's
Words: 5126 Length: 19 Document Type: Term Paper

Issues Presented or Questions of Law: 1) Did the SBL agreement constitute the contract between the parties? 2) Was Plaintiffs' case barred by the parole evidence rule? 3) Should the trial court have sustained Defendants' demurrer to Plaintiffs' case? Holding / Rule of Law: 1) The SBL agreement did not constitute the contract between the parties. The contracts were formed when Plaintiffs accepted Defendants offer and tendered their consideration. Therefore, the SBL agreement and addendum

Legal Briefs Title and Citation: Suggs V.
Words: 563 Length: 2 Document Type: Case Study

Legal Briefs Title and Citation: Suggs v. Norris. No. 364 S.E. 2nd 159. Court of Appeals North Carolina. 2 February 1988 Type of Action: Civil and Contractual Facts of the Case: Darlene Suggs cohabited with Norris, but remained unmarried. During their time together she worked with him as a partner in his produce business and, according to witnesses, was quite instrumental in the success of said business. Suggs also took care of Norris

Legal Brief: Anthony Labriola V. Pollard Group
Words: 448 Length: 2 Document Type: Research Paper

Legal Brief: Anthony Labriola v. Pollard Group Anthony Alan Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc., WA Supreme Court, 2004, No. 74002-0 Whether a 2002 noncompete agreement negotiated after the employee had been hired and without independent consideration is enforceable. SUBSTANTIVE FACTS: Five years after beginning employment as a sales person the employer required the employee sign a noncompete agreement in 2002. In exchange the employee was allowed to remain employed. After the noncompete agreement was signed

Legal Brief the Author Preparing This Brief
Words: 1426 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Legal Brief The author preparing this brief is asked to defend against the banning of a book on the grounds that it is obscene and thus it should be barred from sale and distribution in the public sphere. The laws and standards surrounding obscenity are vague, subjective and impossible to reliably and consistently enforce in a manner that is even-handed and objective. As such, the banning of a book, movie or

Legal Briefs Abstract/Scenario for the
Words: 1316 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

When neither elected to do so, however, there was a violation of the New York Penal Code, leading to the consideration of their guilt or innocence. Implications Under Article 20 of New York Penal Law While the condemnation of a victim is not a viable defense, the implications for Bluto and his obligations under Article 20 deserves exploration. Just as Duty of Retreat applied to Popeye and Olive, it likewise applied

Legal Briefs
Words: 585 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Stedman Facts At issue is the fact that a person named Stedman drew a number of forged checks. The money belonged to the American Lung Association. However, Stedman appropriated the money for herself to the tune of about $130,000. The American Lung Association had an insurance policy to cover losses of this nature, at least to a degree. To that end, Traveler’s covered the losses of the American

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now