In the book, Burns (1978) states that he defined leadership as "leaders inducing followers to act for certain goals that represent the values and the motivations -- the wants and needs, the aspirations and expectations -- of both leaders and followers" (p. 19).
Another important reason that Burns (1978) remains so popular today is that he addresses leadership styles throughout the book by using examples that can be easily related to. Moses, Napoleon, Mahatma Gandhi, and Martin Luther King, Jr. are all discussed. How they led, why, and in what capacity can shed significant light on specific types of leadership skills and the styles with which they best fit. Also included in Burns' (1978) book are Adolf Hitler and Machiavelli, and they are all used to show how leaders who wish to be successful must make a very vital distinction between needs and wants. A leader who wants something cannot always get it, but those who do not have any goals or things that they want often do not strive to do better or to instill the idea of excelling in the people whom they lead.
According to Burns (1978), the leadership process "must be seen as part of the dynamics of conflict and of power; that leadership is nothing if not linked to collective purpose; that the effectiveness of leaders must be judged not by their press clippings but by actual social change measured by intent and by the satisfaction of human needs and expectations" (3). In other words, if the leaders are not continually changing, evolving, and growing, they are doing a disservice to themselves, their followers, their company, and their community. If they meet the needs of those groups, they are indeed successful. The distinction becomes important with meeting needs vs. satisfying wants. Leaders cannot give everyone around them everything that they want, but they can work to meet those people's needs - and individuals recognize that, keeping them 'in the loop' and interested and supporting the leader's actions, plans, and goals.
Leaders of today should not be quick to dismiss the work of Burns, just because it was created some years ago. Instead, they should see that there has been little change in what is truly important when it comes to leadership styles and roles. The more these are explored, the more a person who is in a leadership position can find what truly works for him or her during a particular leadership role. Anyone who has more than one leadership role may also find Burns' (1978) book very interesting, because it clearly shows that different styles may be appropriate - and even necessary - for these roles. The age of the followers, the type of work that is being done, and other factors all matter, and they all must be taken into account. Because Burns' (1978) work is so profound, leaders of today still use his information on transformational, servant-style leadership as a guide for what to do in many situations. This is opposed to the misguided idea that every leadership issue in existence can only be handled through transactional leadership applications.
Bibliography
Benson, F. (1994). One right way doesn't work with leadership either. Journal for…
Transformation Leadership Addendum James MacGregor Burns, a presidential biographer and a leadership expert established the conception of transformational leadership. MacGregor asserted that transformational leadership happens when followers and leaders work together to develop an advanced level of motivation and morals. Via the potency of their idea and character, transformational leaders hold the aptitude to motivate followers to change perceptions, motivations and expectations to work towards shared objectives. Transformational leaders garner respect,
In contrast, a "selling and coaching" (S2) approach is demanded when the leader knows the follower may be uncertain about how to perform the task, but the subordinate has a high level of commitment, as in the case of an intern or a new hire. S2 is a motivational or mentoring approach. The employee craves direction, but will be motivated more by personality and praise than 'carrots and sticks'
Leadership and Realtors I have many aspirations and many things I would like to accomplish in my lifetime. That said, one of my strongest vocations is establishing myself in my community as a successful real estate agent. I've always had a knack for sales and I love architecture and residential construction. But my affinity for real estate probably dates back to my childhood, when my uncle Herbie used to drive me around
Leadership The theories of leadership advanced by Max Weber, James MacGregor Burns and Daniel Goleman are some of the most influential and sophisticated notions in the field of leadership. Some of the ideas denoted by these men have an intrinsic link to one another, such as both Weber and Burns' conception of transactional and transformative leaders. The philosophical espousing of this triumvirate have directly influenced many of the ideas of
familiar concepts transformational transactional leadership, terms coined James MacGregor Burns Prior to discussing the myriad reasons why Martin Luther King Jr. And former United States senator Joseph McCarthy embody the characteristics of transformational and transactional leadership, respectively, it is essential to denote just what those particular traits are and how they are related to these two individuals. In many ways, transactional and transformational leadership are antipodes of one another. The
That is not the case, though, and even a 'grass roots' movement that begins in the bottom levels of a company or a government can make a big difference as to whether changes are made in the higher levels. The reason for this is that people really do want to see the changes that are necessary, but they are often too shy or concerned for their job to start
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now