Law Case Studies Case #1 There are three points to be made about case number one: 1) whether purchasing inventory is acceptable three weeks before declaring bankruptcy, 2) whether Arthur could make a $400 donation to American Cancer Society, and 3) whether Arthur could pay $300 for the current electric bill. Point 1 -- The trustee would not likely to be able to set aside the purchasing of inventory since Arthur is attempting

If the facts support its position, the hospital will argue that it was not negligent in hiring Dr. Dogwood and that nothing in his employment record could have put them on notice of his poor judgment. Claim 3 -- Karl vs. ECR Manufacturer John has a very good product liability claim against the ECR manufacturer. That is because the company supplied a product that was unreasonably dangerous to users in the

Tort Law Case Questions for Barney Barney, how long have you known the plaintiff? Have you lived next door to each other the entire time you have known one another? How would you describe your relationship with the plaintiff? Has it been consistently the same over the years, or has it changed? Would you characterize it as friendly, perhaps even as a friendship or a close friendship? Have you and the plaintiff every had

Criminal Law Case Study Summarize the following cases: Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 (1963) This case involved a protest where 187 blacks filed a petition. They divided themselves into groups of fifteen people. They would protest in public areas. They wanted to air out grievances that their state had policy segregation. All of these had been organized to take place in South Carolina state house grounds. The strike was peaceful because

However, where a state statute exerts control over matters capable of being regulated by Congress under the Commerce Clause, those statutes are invalid because they conflict with a concept that is generally referred to as the "dormant Commerce Clause" (Dershowitz, 2002; Friedman, 2005). In modern application, federal courts apply a three-pronged test to determine whether or not a given state statute is invalid by virtue of a conflict with Congressional

Stark Laws Case Study The Stark Laws are three separate provisions that govern physician self-referral for Medicare and Medicaid patients, named after U.S. Congressman Pete Stark who first sponsored the legislation in the early 1990s. The idea for the laws came into place because of the practice of physician self-referral, or the practice of a doctor referring a patient to a medical organization in which they had some sort of financial