• Home
  • /
  • Topic
  • /
  • Law
  • /
  • Law
  • /
  • Law and Healhcare Administration Law and Health Essay
Verified Document

Law And Healhcare Administration Law And Health Essay

Law and Healhcare Administration Law and Health Care System Administration.

Law and healthcare system administration

From its earliest conception as a highly paternalistic relationship, "the physician-patient relationship has evolved towards shared decision making. This model respects the patient as an autonomous agent with a right to hold views, to make choices, and to take actions based on personal values and beliefs. Patients have been increasingly entitled to weigh the benefits and risks of alternative treatments, including the alternative of no treatment, and to select the alternative that best promotes their own values" (Physician-patient relationship, 2012, University of Washington School of Medicine). However, in the modern healthcare environment, the dominance of insurance companies has in many ways shifted decision-making to bureaucrats from both patients and physicians. Hospitals often also feel that they must make decisions based more in cost-benefit analysis than compassion they would otherwise like, in terms of allocating scarce resources. Despite these pressures of cost, our hospital must remain patient-focused. It must also preserve the integrity of the physician-patient relationship and not interfere with the sacredness of this bond.

However, our hospital also has an obligation to ensure that the physicians that practice here are competent,...

All hospital employees should be aware of the four elements of proof for a plaintiff to prove negligence. These include that: the defendant owed the plaintiff care, legally speaking; that this duty was breached; that the breach caused the injury; and that there is proof of damages done to the plaintiff (Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, 2012, Elements of proof of negligence). "Normally, these elements are included in every medical malpractice claim involving a physician or healthcare worker, but including the hospital as a viable liable defendant in a claims case requires additional considerations" (Medical misdiagnosis, 2012, Medical malpractice). The doctor must usually either be operating as an employee of the hospital or there must be "the semblance of an employer-employee relationship" (Medical misdiagnosis, 2012, Medical malpractice). Occasionally, if the physician is known to be incompetent, the hospital may be proven liable for his actions for allowing him to practice on premises, or the hospital may be held liable exclusively if the physician used diagnostic or other equipment that caused the malpractice (Medical misdiagnosis, 2012, Medical malpractice).
However, a plaintiff does not necessarily need to prove negligence regarding his or her treatment at the hospital. Healthcare is a commodity, and according to retail law the contract of…

Sources used in this document:
References

Breach of warranty. (2012). Lawyers.com. Retrieved at:

http://research.lawyers.com/glossary/breach-of-warranty.html

Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald. (2012). Elements of proof of negligence. Retrieved at:

http://www.lawfitz.com/elements-of-proof-of-negligence-new-york-personal-injury-lawyers
http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/books/aspen/Aspen-The-5.html
http://www.medicalmalpractice.com/resources/medical-malpractice/misdiagnosis/medical-misdiagnosis-hospital-liability.htm
Physician-patient relationship. (2012). University of Washington School of Medicine. Retrieved at: http://depts.washington.edu/bioethx/topics/physpt.html#ques2
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Law and Society
Words: 909 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Law and Society The Nature of Law and Justice - Sadomasochism Sadomasochism presents the complexities and nuances involved in the nature of law and justice. In its purest definition, socially and legally, sadomasochism is a consensual act. There may even be actual contracts involved. However, this presentation shows that just because there is consent to the act, doesn't mean that the dominant can get away with anything. In cases in which the

Law School Personal Statement I
Words: 835 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Proposal

I just like accumulating knowledge and my professional career has shown that you never can really know where you will be needing parts of that knowledge: I worked as a machinist for some time, but then I was able to promote because of the additional knowledge I had gained in the meantime. I hope that the education I will receive in law school would help improve my knowledge portfolio to

Law and Philosophy
Words: 322 Length: 1 Document Type: Term Paper

Law and Philosophy Holmes' "bad man" theory offers insight into the difference between the law and morality. The bad man is not concerned with morality but he is as concerned about the law as any "good" man because in knowing the law, he can avoid getting into trouble. The bad man would lie, cheat, and/or steal if it weren't against the law because he cares not for the morals that underlie

Law Vs. Justice Is Defined
Words: 2191 Length: 7 Document Type: Term Paper

Oliver Wendell Holmes states that justice is subjective and changes according to the viewer's prejudice, viewpoint or social affiliation. But a set of rules is needed to make society function and these rules must be carried out. This philosophy of law applies to Ann Hopkins' case. The senior partner and admissions committee had the prerogative of setting out the rules with which partners should be selected. Their sense of justice

Law Movie Analysis and Research
Words: 1566 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

However, Erin Brockovich the movie has a very different ending than the actual civil action under tort law brought against California's Pacific Gas and Electric Co. The Hollywood ending would have been preferable, however life is just not that simple and a tort law case against such a company is really a long, tiring legal battle. The 1993 legal dispute from Hinkley was resolved by arbitrage and at first

Laws of Corrections When Someone
Words: 1503 Length: 5 Document Type: Case Study

The fact that a guard was able to take information from a prisoner's cell, and give it to prosecutors is a clear violation of basic procedures. As a result, greater amounts of oversight are required to prevent these issues from becoming a problem in the future. ("Deon Christopher Carter v State of Maryland," 2003) Conclusion Clearly, the evidence that was collected from Jones' cell is a violation of the Sixth Amendment.

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now