Verified Document

Landfill Recycling Concrete V. Placing It In Essay

Landfill Recycling Concrete v. Placing it in a Landfill: A Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

As one of the most abundantly used resources in the world -- second only to water, according to some measures -- determining what to do with concrete once it is no longer needed in its original application is a major issue. Most of the time, waste concrete is not structurally flawed or degraded, but the building or structure it was used in is simply no longer needed or is being rebuilt and so the concrete must be torn down while there is still a great deal of usefulness in it. Recycling the concrete thus seems like a very good idea, and to be sure recycling concrete can lead to a major reduction in the raw materials needed around the globe each year for a variety of concrete construction projects. A great deal of energy is also required for the various steps of the recycling process, however, and this has a negative environmental impact in the form of carbon emissions from the burning of fuels to create the needed energy.

The following pages will attempt to present a comparative analysis of the greenhouse gas emissions that result from the various stages and processes involved in recycling concrete and the emissions from the other commonplace method of dealing with waste concrete, putting it in a landfill. Certain parts of this process are nearly identical while others are of course drastically different, ultimately leading to very different emission levels for the two different options. An examination of greenhouse gas emission does not tell the full story of concrete disposal's environmental impact, of course, but it provides an excellent starting place.

Similar First Steps

The initial demolition or removal of concrete from a building or construction site is the first step in concrete's journey wither to a landfill or to the recycling facility, and the bigger the job the more likely it is to involve powerful tools that are ultimately powered by fossil fuels (often pneumatic tools hooked up to air compressors hooked up to gasoline generators). As the emissions that result from this initial demolition would occur regardless of whether the concrete is ultimately recycled or disposed of in...

Parts of this document are hidden

View Full Document
svg-one

The same is true of the next stage of the concrete's journey.
The recycling of concrete can take place at demolition sites with the use of mobile units, but it is more typical for waste concrete to be transported to large static plant for processing into new concrete material. This transportation can itself result in a significant amount of greenhouse gas emissions, as each truckload of waste concrete represents only a few miles to the gallon given the heaviness of the standard load and the size of the transport trucks. While an exact figure for these emissions is impossible to determine given the large variances in travel distance, fuel efficiency, and other factors, these transportation emissions are definitely a part of the environmental impact of recycling concrete, and they also apply to putting waste concrete in landfills. The same transportation emissions that are created driving waste concrete to processing plants for recycling are created driving waste concrete to landfills (again, exact levels cannot be determined).

Landfill Equipment and Processes

It is once the waste concrete arrives at its destination -- either a recycling plant or a landfill -- that the emission potential of the processes really begins to diverge. Even here, however, some of the needs and equipment are the same for recycling concrete as they are for processing it for landfill disposal. Both processes require that the concrete be broken down to a certain degree -- in recycling, this is so the concrete and be better "purified" by passing it through screeners, while landfills are simply trying to maximize the efficiency of the physical space and the equipment being used by working in thin layers to pack everything as tight as possible: concrete dust can get squeezed much thinner than large chunks of the building material (Bliss, 2011; Everett, 2009). Sending concrete to the landfill actually avoids several pieces of heavy duty equipment used to separate materials in the recycling process; the same type of crushers can be used to simply pulverize the concrete and anything embedded in it when all is destined for the landfill, anyway,…

Sources used in this document:
References

AEFinley. (2008). 35 ton class hydraulic excavator. Accessed 28 September 2011. http://www.aefinley.com/uploads/products/pdfs/20081218121127592815.pdf

Bennink, C. (2009). Wheel Loader Designs Squeeze Out More Fuel Efficiency Without Sacrificing Productivity - Squeeze Fuel Costs. Accessed 28 September 2011. http://www.forconstructionpros.com/article/10117148/wheel-loader-designs-squeeze-out-more-fuel-efficiency-without-sacrificing-productivity-squeeze-fuel-costs

Bliss, R. (2011). A compact guide to landfill operation: Machinery, management and misconceptions. Accessed 28 September 2011. http://www.waste-management-world.com/index/display/article-display/273723/articles/waste-management-world/volume-7/issue-5/features/a-compact-guide-to-landfill-operation-machinery-management-and-misconceptions.html

Equipment World. (2011). Accessed 28 September 2011. http://www.equipmentworld.com/equipment-zone/new-caterpillar-dseries-track-loaders-deliver-increased-productivity-enhanced-machine-control-and-easier-service?a=2082
Everett, C. (2009). Concrete must not go to landfill, warn experts. Accessed 28 September 2011. http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/1807224/concrete-landfill-warn-experts
IPPTS Associates. (2011). The Landfill Site. Accessed 28 September 2011. http://www.landfill-site.com/html/landfill_machinery_0.html
Komatsu. (2011). Introduction of Medium Sized Wheel Loader. Accessed 28 September 2011. http://www.komatsu.com/CompanyInfo/profile/report/pdf/157-06_E.pdf
Warren. (2011). Accessed 28 September 2011. http://www.warrencat.com/index.php/www/about_us/latest_news
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Landfills and Landfill Gas: Land-Filling Is One
Words: 648 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Landfills and Landfill Gas: Land-filling is one of the most popular and widely used method of disposing different types of waste materials, more specifically Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), in many countries. In order to fulfill the federal regulations, the landfills are designed and operated in an efficient way and are located in such areas which are away from the residential areas. It is essential to carefully monitor this whole process, as

Landfills One of the Issues
Words: 1293 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

20. In determining these ratios, the government must use Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) for governments, and have its financial statements audited by an independent certified public accountant." (EPA). However, governments who are in default on general obligation bonds or that has any oustanding bonds below a certain rating are ineligible. Operators can also receive corporate guarantees from a guarantor, but that guarantor has to be either a parent corporation

Landfills Hazard to the Community
Words: 1314 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Include the risk or hazard to the community, and provide three bullets addressing the primary message that you want to share about the hazard or risk.Landfills produce bad odors and gas that can affect the health of people living around them. They are also the source of toxic chemicals that get into water sources near them and affect both human life and wildlife. The types of gases commonly found in

Economic Benefits of Landfill Mining
Words: 4223 Length: 15 Document Type: Term Paper

9% Yard Trimmings - 12.9% Food scraps - 12.4%; Plastics - 11.7%; Rubber, leather and textiles - 7.3% Metals - 7.6% Wood - 5.5% Glass - 5.3% The following figure shows the number of landfills in the United States between 1998 and 2006 Number of Landfills in the United States 1998-2006 Source: EPA (1997) The work of van der Zee and de Visser entitled: "Assessing the Opportunities of Landfill Mining" states: "Long-term estimates make clear that the amount of solid waste

Alternative Landfill Covers: Time for
Words: 2539 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

Whereas conventional, compacted clay barriers are designed to prevent the infiltration of water into the waste below the cover, evapotranspiration takes a decidedly different approach. The cover technique actually uses to its advantage the high water storage capacity of fine grained soils to retain water in the soil above the waste and refuse. The water is "stored" in that layer until it is released back into the atmosphere either

Analyzing and Developing a Landfill for Disposing Hazardous Material...
Words: 810 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Landfill for Disposing Hazardous Material Challenges Resistance of the public to siting a waste management facility While citizens are thankful for convenient existing locations for dumping garbage, recyclables, and yard waste, it may be rather hard to gain their acceptance with regard to waste management facility sites (Walker, 2012). Community planning in relation to waste management facility Land-use planning for a community seldom takes into consideration waste management site locations in its community design.

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now