Verified Document

Labeling Theory Essay

Labeling Theory: Theories of Deviance In sociology and criminology, labeling theorists were among the first to suggest that crime was not produced by inherent defects within the individual’s biology or character, but rather was a social construction. Labeling theorists suggested that crime was the result of society’s need to label certain individuals as deviant. This labeling became a self-fulfilling prophesy, to the point that the labeled individuals made their deviant label a part of their identity. Labeling is often used against individuals who are racially, ethnically or socio-economically determined to be abnormal or aberrant, and thus has the effect of creating ostracized groups of entire classes of people. It is ultimately an unproductive concept both for society as well as victimizes the individuals who are labeled and creates rather than prevents the existence of a criminal underclass.

Symbolic Interactionalism

The concept of labeling theory first arose in the early 1960s, when Howard Becker published The Outsiders, a work which suggested that crime was not, in and of itself, a concept inherent to a particular act or concept, but rather was an idea symbolically invested with negative meanings. For example, when two low-income juveniles fight, this is viewed as evidence of their inherent delinquency, but in a wealthier area such an act is seen as simply “boys being boys” (“The Labeling Theory of Crime,” 2016). Similarly, today, the war on drugs is an example of class-directed warfare, given that low-income individuals who abuse drugs are seen as having a problem, while affluent individuals are viewed as having a mental disorder. The power to label results in profoundly different views of what are, effectively, the same act, and results in different labels being affixed to individuals. Labels are affixed based upon class status rather than the severity of the crime the individual commits.

Avoiding Labeling in Criminal Justice

Although the media is often accused of unfairly labeling certain groups as inherently criminal, the justice system itself engages in labeling. “It is sometimes claimed, but more often an underlying assumption…public labelling in response to proven criminal guilt – e.g. of criminal convictions – is permitted, at least in part, because people who commit crimes deserve to be labelled publicly as criminals” (Hadjimatheou, 2016, p.568). Public shame, whether formal (having to state that one has...

The assumption, once again, is that crime is solely the fault of the individual and society is therefore justified in inflicting whatever punishment it deems fit upon that individual.
One way to potentially counterbalance the retributive use of labeling is to take a different view of the purpose of justice, acknowledging societal complicity in the perpetuation of crime. Marxists theories of criminology, much like labeling theorists, stress that crime is a social product. Marxists theorists are more inclined to see the classification of crime based in class-based standards and as a perpetuation of the socioeconomic status quo. But regardless, it is another way to view crime not as an individualized act of deviance but as a response to particular societal circumstances that are framed by forces outside the individual in a very particular way. Another way to view crime, and to punish or discourage crime, is the restorative model of justice, which suggests that individuals who have caused a break in the fabric of the community should make restorative amends (such as cleaning up graffiti, or engaging in community service), versus jail time (“What is Restorative Justice,” 2018). By encouraging the person who has been convicted of a criminal act to do something positive, this reduces the impact of the stigmatizing label.

Labeling theory has a number of challenges in being fully accepted as an accepted theory within the criminal justice system. First and foremost, while it seems to explain some times of crimes, particularly juvenile crimes, it cannot explain why certain crimes are considered uniformly abhorrent across the justice systems of the world and across many historical eras. It is persuasive in explaining the construction of certain types of crimes, such as status-based offenses, which are only crimes because they are committed by certain types of persons (i.e. young people). For example, juveniles can be labeled delinquents if they remain outside past curfew, consume any amount of alcohol, and do not go to school. This can result in their being labeled criminal and stigmatized.

Not only does the nature of a status-based offense suggest that society views certain types of actions by specific groups of people very differently; the variable nature with which such crimes are enforced within the justice system can create a greater tendency to label certain groups. According to the…

Sources used in this document:

References

Disproportionate minority contact and juvenile justice. (2014). Coalition for Juvenile Justice

Retrieved from: https://csgjusticecenter.org/youth/publications/disproportionate- minority-contact-and-status-offenses/

Hadjimatheou, K. (2016). Criminal labelling, publicity, and punishment. Law and Philosophy,

35: 567–593.

The labeling theory of crime. (2016). Revise Sociology. Retrieved from:

https://revisesociology.com/2016/08/20/labelling-theory-crime-deviance/

What is restorative justice? (2018). The Center for Restorative Justice. Retrieved from:

http://restorativejustice.org/#sthash.vipBPSuK.dpbs

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Labeling Theory of Deviance
Words: 1212 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

Labeling Theory of Deviance Labeling theory integrate well into radical criminology as it perceives criminal behavior to be defined by society. The powerful in the society like the judges, parents, police, to mention but a few tend to label the less powerful. Ones conduct is never classified as right or wrong but as a deviant behavior. It is not only criminal behaviors that are treated as deviant. The society's alcoholics and

Labeling Theory Criminality Is an Unfortunate but
Words: 1119 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Labeling Theory Criminality is an unfortunate but inevitable component of human society. As much as people would like to believe that there is a way to create a type of community that has no crime, psychologists and other experts in the field of criminology have done research and created various hypotheses which show that criminality is actually an inevitability under any circumstances where large numbers of human beings interact and then

Labeling Theory Originating in Sociology and Criminology,
Words: 1603 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

Labeling Theory Originating in sociology and criminology, labeling theory (also known as social reaction theory) was developed by sociologist Howard S. Becker (1997). Labeling theory suggests that deviance, rather than constituting an act, results from the societal tendency of majorities to negatively label those individuals perceived as deviant from norms. Essentially, labeling theory involves how the self-identity and behavior of individuals determines or influences the terms used to describe or classify

Labeling Theory and Juvenile Crime
Words: 826 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Labeling Theory and Juvenile Crime Do we perform to expectations? One study of gifted children suggested that this was the case: in an experiment, teachers were told that certain pupils in their classroom had tested as 'gifted.' Almost immediately, the teachers began to treat these children differently, and the children began to perform at a higher standard. However, the teachers had actually been intentionally misinformed -- the children had been selected

Labeling Theory
Words: 1250 Length: 4 Document Type: Research Paper

Labeling theory The labeling theory is one of the various social behavior theories that seek to explain the cause of deviant behaviors within the society. Here, the theorists tend to describe deviant behavior as behavior that which becomes deviant only when labeled so. This approach tends to explain why the labeling theorists are not much interested in what causes the primary deviation. They tend to shelve the question of what causes

Labeling Theory and Its Specific
Words: 5492 Length: 16 Document Type: Term Paper

This in turn more often than not leads the stigmatized to acquire more and more deviant and possibly criminal identities (Lanier & Henry, 1998). There can, of course, be other antecedents prior to labeling that can enhance the process of delinquency in juveniles. Mental and/or psychological impairments must also be considered as a contributing factor. Certain of these attributes can also contribute to highly suggestible levels in regards to behavior

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now