3.2 The significance of organization to issue and vice versa (330 words)
In the end, the issue that faces TransCanada is selling the pipeline to the public effectively enough, as well as to the populations that can green-light the project, so that the project goes forward and thus allowing TransCanada to deliver oil more efficiently and quickly than is currently possible given the current oil transportation infrastructure that exists. This is especially true given the advent of oil sands and fracking in the United States as well as parts of Canada (Koring, 2013). The gist of the issue is that many people support the pipeline but some are concerned and many of the people that are averse to the project are politicians that are trying to push green energy and/or are anti-oil in general. (TransCanada, 2013).
The issue is significant to the organization but the same is true in reverse. The general concerns about energy accidents and there not being enough emphasis on green energy initiatives is certainly salient and relevant to the issue but TransCanada can certainly counter that petroleum-based energy is not going anywhere anytime soon. Even so, the concerns about energy prices, energy accidents and the overall impacts to everyone involved is something that TransCanada certainly need to be cognizant and aware of and they fail to do so at their own peril as the blogosphere, media sphere and the general population will probably generally support TransCanada more often than they do not but that can literally turn on a dime and, as BP found out, that "turn" can be quite vicious and damaging. BP is still around but they had to a pay a heavy price because of that Gulf spill. Even though pipelines over ground have shown to be good over the long haul, it will be no less easy for TransCanada to sell this one.
4.1 An existing academic definition of publics and apply it to identify your organization's publics in relation to this issue (150 words)
Publics can basically be any group of people or organizations that can be classified as being major audiences as it pertains to the realm of public relations. For TransCanada, the publics that they must deal with (just like any other firm) include the employees and shareholders but also includes the public, the politicians, and the special interest groups. The publics in particular that distinguish TransCanada are the politicians that have the ability to green-light the project and the populace that can urge (or resist) the pipeline's construction and progress. TransCanada must attack on both fronts and tout the benefits and the safety of the pipeline and what it will mean to energy prices and energy availability, both of which go hand in hand. In other words, they must attack the social and political front while at the same time worrying about profitability and ongoing concerns (TransCanada, 2013).
4.2 The order of priority of these publics (150 words)
Because of the nature of TransCanada's business, the normal order of things as it relates to publics being employees and shareholders first is probably not going to be true, at least not in situations like this where the concerns of the public and the politicians are literally the only thing standing in the way of a project like the Keystone XL pipeline. If the author of this paper were to rank the order of public right now, it would be politicians, the public populace, employees, shareholders and then everyone else. During normal times, the politicians and regular employee would probably take a back seat to the employees and shareholders but anytime there is a spike in energy prices or a project proposed like this, the order will indeed shift. In modern times with things like war in the Middle East (a high-oil area) and energy accidents (like the BP oil spill), it would seem that high alert is the norm nowadays.
4.3 The connection between these publics and your organization in relation to this specific issue (150 words)
As noted elsewhere in this paper, the connection between this issue, the publics and TransCanada are not hard to see and it is also clear that some hard-set opinions and viewpoints are currently guiding the debate. Even so, many of the concerns and priorities levied by all the groups involved are important to some degree and a common-sense and multi-faceted solution for everyone involved should be found because the benefits to Canada (as well as to the United States and over countries) can be easy to find if one only looks. However, there are dangers that have to be realized and recognized as well and failure to take these seriously can lead...
Fracking and Ethics Introduction While “fracking”—the term applied to the practice of hydraulic fracturing of rock to gain access to the oil or gas underground—has been hailed as a revolutionary way for the oil industry to draw oil from previously hard to reach places, there are a variety of ethical issues surrounding the practice (Evensen & Stedman, 2018). Stakeholders in the issue of fracking go beyond those in the oil/gas industry, however.
Fracking in Colorado Hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") is not a new approach to locating and exploiting gas and oil in the United States. It has been used as a strategy since 1949, according to Earthworks, an environmental group. Fracking is a strategy oil and gas companies use to retrieve quantities of oil and gas that are trapped in shales, coalbed formations and other underground areas that have previously been drilled. The environmental
Fracking and Tar Sands The objective of this study is to examine the issues of fracking or hydraulic fracturing and tar sands or oil sands. Fracking is described as "the process of drilling and injecting fluid into the ground at a high pressure in order to fracture shale rocks to release natural gas inside." (Dangers of Fracking, 2015, p. 1) The Debate There is a great debate that is ongoing concerning the process of
1. Executive summary While the extraction of natural gas by means of hydraulic fracturing is a decade- long practice, of late, it has witnessed immense development owing to advancements in the area of horizontal drilling which enables gas and oil operators to now harness earlier- unprofitable natural gas reserves within rock formations. Extant extraction- related policies combine state-federal alliances and voluntary endeavors by private organizations. More unprejudiced, scientific studies providing details
Fracking and Water Quality Ethics Literature Review What is Fracking? Fracking is used to extract natural gas from shale layers located deep in the ground. The impermeability of the shale layers leads to the gas being trapped. The rocks are blasted with pressurized water that contain sand and chemicals capable of increasing friction between the rocks and water. However, the percentage of the fluid consisting of the chemicals is very small. Some
Hydraulic fracking of gas and oil wells in the northeast region of the United States is controversial, and it has the potential to create devastating and long lasting environmental damage and human health problems. How this part of the country been affected by fracking Industrial gas exploration including horizontal exploration using high-volume fracking, results in significant adverse effects. These effects are an outcome of activities like; changes in usage of land road building
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now