Verified Document

Keystone XL Pipeline Is A Proposed Oil Essay

Keystone XL Pipeline is a proposed oil pipeline that would transport crude oil from the Canadian oil sands to refineries in the Gulf of Mexico. According to project backer TransCanada, the pipeline is a 36-inch diameter pipe that will carry crude on a 2673-kilometer (1661 mi) journey from the eastern Alberta town of Hardisty to the Gulf Coast. Hardisty is a pipeline nexus, so the oil would come down from the oil sands to the town before entering the Keystone pipeline. The oil would then travel on a route through Saskatchewan, South Dakota, Nebraska into an existing pipeline (Keystone Phase II) through Kansas and Oklahoma to its final delivery point at Nederland, Texas and refineries at Port Arthur on the Gulf Coast (TransCanada, 2011). The pipeline would have the capacity to bring 700,000 barrels per day from Alberta to Texas (Avok, 2011). The amounts to approximately 6-7% of total U.S. daily oil imports (TransCanada, 2011). The pipeline has been subject to considerable controversy, mainly in the United States. The project, by virtue of crossing the border, required approval from the State Department, giving the President the ability to cancel the project. It was announced in November 2011 that any decision on the project would be delayed until at least 2013 (Goodell, 2011). In response to the delay, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper told President Obama that Canada would turn to Asian markets instead of waiting for the U.S. (CBC, 2011).

The most virulent source of objections to the project comes from environmental groups. At the heart of the opposition is the high cost of crude from Canada. Crude from oil sands is subject to...

The carbon footprint from oil sands crude is therefore higher than the carbon footprint from other forms of crude, although some have argued that shipping foreign crude from the other side of the world is just as dirty (Hahn & Passell, 2011). The environmental activists opposed to this form of extraction as being dirty have surprisingly little to say about the massive, unsustainable and sometimes downright stupid oil consumption patterns that make oil sands extraction viable in the first place. It is easier to vilify large oil companies that individual consumers. Oil sands pollution is the messenger, not the message, but the environmental groups attacking Keystone want to shoot the messenger rather than address the problem at the root cause level.
To this end, they have put their pressure on the American government, having failed to convince the Canadian or Albertan governments to give up such a lucrative revenue stream. The environmental opposition has teamed with groups in the United States to apply pressure to stop or delay the project. Nebraska's governor signed a bill to divert the project away from the environmentally sensitive Sandhills and Ogallala aquifer areas, for example (Avok, 2011). There is considerable local opposition to energy projects both clean and dirty, meaning that some of the local U.S. opposition is unrelated to the source of the oil and is largely of the NIMBY variety (Levi, 2011; Hahn & Passell, 2011).

There are significant disagreements about how many jobs the project will create. TransCanada (2011) argues that the project will create…

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited:

Avok, M. (2011). Nebraska governor signs bill to reroute Keystone pipeline. Reuters. Retrieved November 27, 2011 from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/22/us-oil-pipeline-nebraska-idUSTRE7AL1M120111122

Blodget, H. (2011). NRDC: There's no way in hell the Keystone pipeline will create 20,000 jobs. Business Insider. Retrieved November 27, 2011 from http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-11-13/green_sheet/30393379_1_keystone-xl-keystone-pipeline-tar-sands

CBC. (2011). Harper looks to Asian energy markets after Keystone delay. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved November 27, 2011 from http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/11/14/pol-harper-obama-apec.html

Goodell, J. (2011). Is the Keystone pipeline really dead? Rolling Stone. Retrieved November 27, 2011 from http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/is-the-keystone-pipeline-really-dead-20111123
Hahn, R. & Passell, P. (2011). Killing the Keystone XL pipeline: What next? Tilting at windmills? Forbes. Retrieved November 27, 2011 from http://www.forbes.com/sites/econmatters/2011/11/20/killing-the-keystone-xl-pipeline-what-next-tilting-at-windmills/
Levi, M. (2011). A shortsighted victory in delaying the Keystone pipeline. New York Times. Retrieved November 27, 2011 from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/11/opinion/a-shortsighted-victory-in-delaying-the-keystone-pipeline.html
TransCanada. (2011). Keystone pipeline project. TransCanada. Retrieved November 27, 2011 from http://www.transcanada.com/keystone.html
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Keystone XL Pipeline Project Should Not Go
Words: 2023 Length: 6 Document Type: Research Paper

Keystone XL Pipeline Project Should Not Go Forward The Canadian gas and oil corporation known as TransCanada would like to build a new pipeline from Alberta, Canada, to Texas; the pipeline, 2,000 miles of it, would carry some of the dirtiest crude oil (tar sands oil) known in the world into the United States to be refined and used domestically as fuel for transportation and other uses. The problem with

Keystone XL PR This Report
Words: 2919 Length: 7 Document Type: Book Report

TransCanada is fighting people that are worried more about aesthetics and ideals rather than benefits to the consumer (TransCanada, 2013). 3.2 The significance of organization to issue and vice versa (330 words) In the end, the issue that faces TransCanada is selling the pipeline to the public effectively enough, as well as to the populations that can green-light the project, so that the project goes forward and thus allowing TransCanada to

Heavier Environmental Regulation on Oil and Gas Drilling Activities...
Words: 5303 Length: 16 Document Type: Research Paper

Regulating Oil and Gas Drilling and Transport The American economy runs on energy produced from oil, coal, natural gas, hydroelectric power, nuclear power and renewable sources like solar and wind energies. In fact according to a report in the Congressional Research Service, oil provides the United States with 40% of its total energy needs. It is used in myriad ways, providing "…fuel for the transportation, industrial, and residential sectors" (Ramseur, 2012).

Primary Source and Energy
Words: 1340 Length: 3 Document Type: Other (not listed above)

Eilperin, J. & Dennis, B. (2017). Trump administration to approve final permit for Dakota Access pipeline. Washington Post. Feb 7, 2017. Retrieved online: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/02/07/trump-administration-to-approve-final-permit-for-dakota-access-pipeline/ Although not a scholarly source or a primary source, this article in the Washington Post directly addresses the core political concerns related to the proposed Dakota Access pipeline. The article includes a map showing what lands the pipeline would traverse, and the author addresses the land use

Business News from Around the World
Words: 1268 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Business News Analysis Thomas (2017) reports that President Trump is urging the pharmaceutical industry to lower its prices on drugs sold in the market. As an incentive to lowering prices, Trump has pledged to "ease rules" -- i.e., deregulate the industry substantially. As much of the time and money that goes into producing a drug for market consists of testing and reporting to the FDA, this pledge by the White House

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now