¶ … Kashmir Dispute
Kashmir is at the heart of a dispute between Pakistan and India. This dispute has been ongoing for more than 50 years, and does not show any easy or immediate way of being resolved. The background of the dispute is a boundary. There is a line of control that runs through Kashmir. It divides the region in two. One area is generally governed and monitored by India, while the other side is controlled by Pakistan (The future, n.d.).
The boundary is not a formal one, however, so there are still arguments over where it is located and if it should be located somewhere else. India is happy with the boundary as it stands, and would like to see it made official, formal, and permanent right where it is. However, Pakistan does not agree with this assessment. That country would like greater control over more of Kashmir, so it wants to see the boundary moved to a more central location. There is also the matter of what the Kashmiri people want, which is more control over their own region (The future, n.d.).
India and Pakistan started fighting over Kashmir in 1947, with a war that officially ended in 1948 (The future, n.d.). The United Nations got involved, and an agreement was reached. India ended up with two-thirds of Kashmir, while Pakistan received one third. In 1972, the line that divided the area was renamed the Line of Control, and no longer called the ceasefire line (The future, n.d.). India is making concessions in agreeing to let the Line of Control be the international border, because India actually believes it should have all of Kashmir.
Pakistan wants the line moved, so that the Kashmir Valley -- which is predominantly a Muslim area -- would be on its side (The future, n.d.). Since 1989, though, the Kashmiri people have been fighting for independence (The future, n.d.). Some insist on having the whole state belong to them, and others are willing to give up part of it to India, Pakistan, or both. Either way, though, there is a great deal of stress involved and a significant number of lives at stake, all of which has to be considered...
Kashmir occupation by Indian forces and the breach of the right of self-determination it has led to. It additionally focuses on the boycott by the Kashmiri public of the Indian Parliamentary elections. Kashmir; Self-determination vs. Self-destruction Kashmir stands as the basis of a long-standing dispute between two neighbouring South Asian countries, India and Pakistan. This dispute has caused loss of life not only to the Indian and Pakistani forces but also
Constructivism is based in a socio-political framework and must be interpreted according to the specific moral proclamations that pervade the minds of the inhabitants of a nation and also the leaders who put forth such laws. Social constructivists would argue that the Kashmiri people have endured a painful history full of bloodshed due to international conflicts. The formation of Kashmir as an independent nation has yet to come, but
Kashmir The issue of whether the region of Kashmir should be an independent state, part of India, or part of Pakistan, has been a source of serious conflict ever since India and Pakistan were partitioned into two different countries in 1947. When that partition occurred, the two new countries were divided along largely religious lines: most residents of the new country of India was Hindi, while most residents of the new
How Compellence by Indian and Pakistan has Prolonged the Kashmir Question Introduction The partition of British India into the two independent nations in August 1947 was intended to create coexisting, peaceful homelands for the Hindus and Sikhs in India and Moslems in Pakistan. Since that time, however, India and Pakistan have waged three shooting wars over the hotly disputed territories of Kashmir where each nation claims ownership. Today, an uneasy ceasefire exists
Both the Maharaja and the Prime Minister agreed to these terms and on October 26 the Maharaja signed the Instrument of Accession (GlobalSecurity.org 2009)." Indeed, the First Kashmir War had three major personalities / entities vying for control or maintenance thereof of the disputed region; the Indian and Pakistani governments and the Maharaja of Kashmir. Despite wanting to remain independent, the Maharaja could not do so because of the
Additionally, it is important to note that the perceptual nature of truth, even as it is unexamined does not in itself make truth genuine -- and that all is not relative. Instead: Bhaskar contrasts a relative and developing ethical naturalism with a rational moral realism. Ethical naturalism is at the level of moral rules designed to guide actions, and these change over time with changes in our ethical concepts (for
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now