Verified Document

Karl Popper's Proposed Solution To The Demarcation Admission Essay

Karl Popper's Proposed Solution To The Demarcation Problem: Popper vs. Kuhn

According to the philosopher Karl Popper, "the central problem in the philosophy of science is that of demarcation, i.e., of distinguishing between science and what he terms 'non-science'" (Thornton 2009). Colloquially, of course, all of us think we know what science is -- it is the scientific method, or the proving of a hypothesis. But even here there is confusion, given that what constitutes a scientific 'theory' is not what is meant by 'theory' when a layperson speaks. And much of what we intuitively believe to be science may not be science at all, given that it may be based more upon observed correlations and observed, personal experiences than the proving and disproving of hypotheses. According to Popper, what we call science is largely a web of hypotheses, rather than 'truth.'

Popper called the problem of distinguishing between science and non-science to be a problem of demarcation. Popper was unusual amongst philosophers of his era to take seriously Hume's critique of scientific induction which is: "Our knowledge of such contingent truths could only be grounded in our experience. But the principle of the uniformity of nature isn't something that we can just 'see' to be true. As a result, it appears that we could only have inductive evidence to support it. So it seems that the only way we could justify anything like the inductive principle is through induction" (Beisecker 2005). Although our presumptions may be accurate much of the time, they are hardly true all of the time.

Popper's critique of Hume is that pure, objective inductive observation is, in fact, not the foundation of all scientific theories. "All observation is selective and theory-laden -- there are no pure or theory-free observations" (Thornton 2009). Observation takes place only with a purpose, whether the purpose is a consciously-designed experiment or everyday observation. There is no unique, scientific methodology that stands apart from conventional observation. All human activity "consists largely of problem-solving," whether the problem is a theoretical...

Science is based on problems, not observations, and observations are meaningless, scientifically, unless the observation is designed to solve problems.
This problem-solving approach, however, can be riddled with errors, based upon the desire of human beings to want to prove a particular theory true or false. It is very easy to find evidence to prove a particular hypothesis, regardless of how erroneous it might be, and also because it is virtually impossible to be exposed to all examples of a phenomenon. Instead of the inductive method, Popper proposes falsifiability as the standard for any scientific theory. "For Popper, a theory is scientific only if it is refutable by a conceivable event. Every genuine test of a scientific theory, then, is logically an attempt to refute or to falsify it, and one genuine counter-instance falsifies the whole theory" (Thornton 2009).

Popper's theory of falsification and his denial of the inductive method is also a superior way to deal with the question of scientific phenomena that cannot be observed in their entirety. "It is logically impossible to conclusively verify a universal proposition by reference to experience (as Hume saw clearly), but a single counter-instance conclusively falsifies the corresponding universal law. In a word, an exception, far from 'proving' a rule, conclusively refutes it" (Thornton 2009). A theory is just that -- a theory -- which receives additional corroboration based upon experience. More and more empirical evidence mounts in support of the theory, the theory is finally falsified by a contradictory example or a better theory supplants the original theory. "In practice a single conflicting or counter-instance is never sufficient methodologically to falsify a theory," but when the counter-instances outweigh the original support, gradually the theory begins to be questioned (Thornton 2009).

The development of a theory begins with the creation of an internally logical problem statement that is not self-contradictory, and is distinguished between its empirical and logical propositions. The theory must also be…

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited

Beisecker, Dave. "Induction." Philosophy 101. [30 Jan 2011]

http://faculty.unlv.edu/beisecker/Courses/Phi-101/Induction.htm

Bird, Alexander. "Thomas Kuhn." The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2011.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/thomas-kuhn/
[30 Jan 2011] http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/popper/
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Why Astrology and Astronomy Are Similar Yet Different
Words: 1617 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

Astrology versus AstronomyOn the one hand, astrology maintains that the positions and movements of celestial bodies exert a powerful but nebulous influence on humans in supernatural ways. While astrology has declined in popularity and hard-core believers in the United States over the past century, it did experience a brief resurgence as part of the �new wave� movement in the closing years of the 20th century but it never regained its

Survival of Zi Wei Do Shu or the Purple Star Astrology
Words: 6653 Length: 20 Document Type: Thesis

Survival of Zi Wei Do Shu or the Purple Star Astrology The psychology and behavior of individuals has been studied using the astrological structured for years, however this aspect has not been evaluated and researched in detail especially in the context of the Purple Star Astrology from the Chinese Astrological Structures. This section reveals a concise, yet comprehensive review of preceding theories and researches of human behavior and psychology existent within

Feng Shui Balance in All
Words: 637 Length: 2 Document Type: Thesis

Whenever a person planted a garden or changed a landscape in any way, it was important to be sure that this balance was taken into consideration. A second school of feng shui was developed in order to show the best places for objects. This school used a grid, compass, and square to determine where objects are in harmony with one another ("Feng Shui," 2009). Today, it is this school of

Nature of Science Even in
Words: 595 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

Smith notes that it may be impossible to unequivocally prove something with one hundred percent accuracy; rather, scientists seek probability. The term theory is often misconstrued: Smith states that "theories always explain facts." Moreover, there is no clear demarcation between a theory and a hypothesis. Theories are basically broad hypotheses. Laws, on the other hand, are more restrictive and are often derived from theories. The practice of science entails experimentation

Philosophy Saint Augustine Confessions
Words: 1497 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

Augustine's main problem when it came to conceiving of the spiritual nature of God? What solution did he find? Before answering this question, it is important to clarify what exactly is meant by "spiritual nature of God." Many things could be meant by this phrase, but for the purposes of this essay, I stipulate that it refers to "any substance... other than that which the eyes normally perceive" (Conf., VII.i.1).

Romeo and Juliet by William
Words: 2549 Length: 8 Document Type: Essay

Critic Bloom continues, "But it could be said also that the audience would understand that Romeo, as a lover-hero, really belongs to another religion, the religion of love, which doesn't collide with Christianity or prevent him from confessing to Friar Laurence, but nonetheless has different standards of what's good and bad" (Bloom 2000, 159). Thus, a strong love like Romeo and Julie profess for each other, is like a

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now