Verified Document

Kant's Opinion On The Golden Rule Term Paper

¶ … Metaphysics of Morals" philosopher Immanuel Kant famously argues that his Categorical Imperative is fundamentally different, and superior to the greatly flawed Golden Rule. Kant asserts that the Categorical Imperative is based on the solid rock of rationality, and allows for the formulation of universal moral rules. In contrast, he notes that the Golden Rule is not based on the rational will of the human being, and cannot formulate true universal moral rules. Ultimately, the Golden Rule is a much better tool to help guide the irrational reality of human morality and behavior. The Golden Rule is often considered to be one of humanities most basic, fundamental moral tenants. It appears in most moral traditions and in the majority of major religions in many different guises. It often appears in a positive form, as in the Christian Bible, " 'do unto others as you would have them do unto you' (Matthew 7: 12" (cited in Xrefer). Similarly the Golden Rule sometimes appears in a negative form, urging the individual not to do unto others what you do not want done to you, as in the teachings of Confucius. The Golden Rule does not speak specifically to particular ideals, beliefs or moral principles, thus making it widely useful across a wide span of religious and cultural traditions (Xrefer).

Kant's discussion of the golden rule is firmly rooted in his Categorical Imperative. As such, a through understanding of the Categorical Imperative is necessary to understand why the philosopher would be as dismissive of the Golden Rule as clearly inferior to his own Categorical Imperative.

Kant developed the Categorical Imperative in what is arguably his most famous work, aptly and awkwardly entitled "Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals." In this profoundly influential text, the great philosopher undergoes a thorough investigation for the underlying causes of morality, and attempts to establish a supreme, overarching principle that should guide al human morality.

The Dictionary of Philosophical Terms and Names...

A hypothetical imperative (of the form, 'If you want X, then do A.') is always conditioned on something else, but a categorical imperative (of the form 'Do A.') is absolute and universal. Moral action for Kant always follows from the categorical imperative, 'Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it become a universal law.'"
Kant himself more succinctly states his Categorical Imperative as "Act only on that maxim whereby thou canst at the same time will that it should become a universal law." Under Kant's Categorical Imperative, an action can only be considered moral if it fulfils three important criteria. First, the action must be judged to be universally acceptable. Second, the action must be judged to respect the dignity of persons. Finally, the judged action must be acceptable to rational people. Further, the Categorical Imperative must always be followed regardless of individual self-interest.

Kant's Categorical Imperative has often been interpreted as simply a restatement of the Golden Rule. In fact, Kant himself seems to have argued that the Categorical Imperative was closely related to the Golden Rule, and that it logically emerged from the Golden Rule. However, in the endnotes of "Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals" Kant clearly argues that the Golden Rule and the Categorical Imperative are two completely different philosophical approaches.

Certainly, the Categorical Imperative and the Golden Rule appear to be greatly similar. The Categorical Imperative clearly notes that an action can only be considered moral if it is applicable as a moral law. Once again, Kant himself states, "Act only on that maxim whereby thou canst at the same time will that it should become a universal law." Certainly, it appears that Kant feels that one must show proper respect for other persons, and to treat others as one wishes to be treated. On the…

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited

Dictionary of Philosophical Terms and Names. Garth Kemerling. ©1997-2001. 27 February 2002. http://www.philosophypages.com/dy/c.htm#catimp.

Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge, U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Morgan, Michael P. Classics of Moral and Political Theory, Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett, 1996.

Xrefer: The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Golden Rule. 10 December 2002. http://www.xrefer.com/entry/552193
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Sports Business and Ethics Issues
Words: 1882 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

" (Council of Europe, nd) Boone holds that it is the responsibility of the educators and training to understand that "intellectual dishonesty in exercise physiology weakens the integrity of the evolving profession. Central to membership in a professional organization is the moral balance and appreciation for ethically-based thinking." (2003) In other words, first the integrity of the profession of teaching and coaching sports must be upheld by those professionals who are

Does the Fisher, Ury Model Work
Words: 29882 Length: 120 Document Type: Dissertation

Negotiation Skills A High Impact Negotiations Model: An Answer to the Limitations of the Fisher, Ury Model of Principled Negotiations This study aims to discover the ways in which blocked negotiations can be overcome by testing the Fisher, Ury model of principled negotiation against one of the researcher's own devising, crafted after studying thousands of negotiation trainees from over 100 multinational corporations on 5 continents. It attempts to discern universal applications of

Justification of Constraints in Non-Consequentialism
Words: 1556 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

Bibliography 1. Nagel, Thomas. The Limits of Objectivity. The Tanner Lecture on Human Values. Delivered at Brasenose College, Oxford University. May 1979. Page 126. On the Internet at http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/nagel80.pdf 2. The Trolley Problem. Wikipedia. On the Internet at http://www.ezresult.com/article/Trolley_problem 3. The Non-Philosopher's Guide to Can Bad Men Make Good Brains do Bad Things? On the Internet at http://www.mindspring.com/~mfpatton/binvat.htm 4. http://www.hu.mtu.edu/~tlockha/h3710ethicaltheory.s02.doc Nagel, Thomas. The Limits of Objectivity. The Tanner Lecture on Human Values. Delivered at Brasenose

Metaphysics and Its Relevancy to
Words: 4918 Length: 15 Document Type: Term Paper

Besides this, one can, as a separate undertaking, show these people later the way of reasoning about these things. In this metaphysics, it will be useful for there to be added here and there the authoritative utterances of great men, who have reasoned in a similar way; especially when these utterances contain something that seems to have some possible relevance to the illustration of a view. (13) By contrast, Mercer

Ethics and Morality Online: Sample
Words: 1963 Length: 6 Document Type: Thesis

Those guidelines must be respected in all instances -- every manager will feel as if his or her current crisis is the one sufficiently dire to contact an employee on vacation. If vacations become extensions of the office, the spiritually enriching aspects of human life will begin to be depleted, and on a practical level, if the company does not compensate workers for working on vacation, this is time

Ethics and Philosophy
Words: 580 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

ethical theory hinges on the concept of right and wrong. Philosophers since Aristotle have debated the meaning of morality for thousands of years. The idea that everyone has an individual opinion of right vs. wrong equates to moral relativism. Are morals relative or absolute? Are actions inherently good or bad, regardless of their consequences? Or are consequences the summon bonum? And is an action good or right because of

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now