Verified Document

Kant Mill And Aristotle Essay

Ethical Theory The author of this report has been asked to answer several questions about noted ethicists and philosophers. There will also be coverage of both of those as they pertain to happiness, good, evil and utilitarianism. The people that will be covered in these answers include Mill and Kant. When it comes to Mill, there will be a definition of happiness as well as what is meant by something or someone being intrinsically good or evil. As it relates to Kant, there will be the question of whether it is ever morally acceptable under Kantian ethics to lie to patients so as to not cause them psychological harm. Finally, there will be the question of whether it is practical or possible to combine utilitarianism and ethics of care. While some ethical questions about healthcare are cut and dry and have a fairly to very obvious answer, there are most certainly shades of gray that must be toiled and dealt with.

Questions Answered

When it comes to the definition of happiness, there multiple layers to the answer but they are fairly distinct when read from the work and assertions of Mill. First, Mill aligns with Aristotle on the same subject when he says that happiness requires activities that are specific to humans. For example, driving a car might bring happiness to someone and that would work under the Mill/Aristotle viewpoint as only humans...

Mill expanded on that answer by saying that humans must have faculties and appetites that are clearly superior to that of other animals. Mill believed in all of this based on main thing, which Aristotle happened to agree with. Both men suggested that only humans can live according to reason. Indeed, other animals live according to instinct and much more basic feelings that do not include any sophisticated logic. Instead, animals really only worry about meeting their needs and defending their brethren (sometimes) but logic and reason do not enter the equation. Animals react without a lot of consideration and certainly no depth of morality or reason (Senior, 2012). When it comes to matters that are intrinsically good or bad, Mill is very clear on the former. He notes that pleasure is the only thing that is intrinsically good (Krieger, 2016). When it comes to things that are intrinsically bad, Mill was very much a proponent of the work of Plato and this would indicate that while pleasure is intrinsically good, pain would be the opposite and would be intrinsically bad (Zimmerman, 2002).
As far as whether a healthcare provider should lie so as to prevent psychological harm, Kantians would most certainly say that this would be wrong even if the intentions were good. Kant held that morality is based on a categorical imperative. Meaning,…

Sources used in this document:
References

Krieger, E. (2016). Mill on Happiness. University of Colorado. Retrieved 5 February 2016, from http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/center/rome/papers/Evan_Kreider_Mill_on_Happiness.pdf

Lachman, V. (2012). Applying the Ethics of Care to Your Nursing Practice. Medsurg Nursing, 21(2), 112-116.

Senior, U. (2012). What is Happiness? Aristotle vs. Mill. Bear Market. Retrieved 5 February 2016, from https://bearmarketreview.wordpress.com/2012/12/03/what-is-happiness-aristotle-vs.-mill/

TAMU. (2016). ethics3. Philosophy.tamu.edu. Retrieved 5 February 2016, from http://philosophy.tamu.edu/~sdaniel/Notes/ethics3a.html
Zimmerman, M. (2002). Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Value. Plato.stanford.edu. Retrieved 5 February 2016, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/value-intrinsic-extrinsic/
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Aristotle, Mill & Kant on Emotion Ethics
Words: 555 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

Aristotle, Mill & Kant on emotion Ethics and its role on Emotion of Pleasure: Views from Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and J.S. Mill Analyzing the ethics of emotion, especially feelings of pleasure, is contemplated upon by the great philosophers Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill. Each philosophers have arguments about the ethics of human emotions; however, despite the differences in focus and discussion of this issue, all three philosophers that the path

Mill, Kant, and Torture an Analysis of
Words: 2050 Length: 6 Document Type: Essay

Mill, Kant, And Torture An Analysis of the Utilitarian and Kantian Arguments for and against Torture Alan Dershowitz expresses moral approval (with reservations) in his essay "Should the Ticking Time Bomb Terrorist be Tortured?" Dershowitz's argument is essentially that of a Utilitarian. But it also contains elements of Kantianism. While a Kantian, however, could argue against the moral correctness of torture, Dershowitz steers the argument away from a Kantian perusal of the

Aristotle, Utilitarianism, Immanuel Kant Aristotle,
Words: 799 Length: 2 Document Type: Questionnaire

Engagements in actions that are thought to be virtuous make one to be virtuous. On the other hand, immorality arises when a person has filed to live up to the requirements of the good habits and actions expected of him or her. Deontologists take positive actions as the posterior characteristics. Utilitarian theory claims that the product of an act determines whether it is a virtue or vice. If the

Ethical Behavior According to Mill,
Words: 2008 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

Here, Aristotle recognizes the variances which appear to define our establishment of the means to pursuing happiness, musing that "the characteristics that are looked for in happiness seem also, all of them, to belong to what we have defined happiness as being. For some identify happiness with virtue, some with practical wisdom, others with a kind of philosophic wisdom, others with these, or one of these, accompanied by pleasure or not without pleasure; while others

Aristotle, Happiness and Pleasure Was Moderation and
Words: 1148 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Aristotle, happiness and pleasure was moderation and a middle action between two vices. . So, for example, modesty would be a virtue as it comes between two extremes or vices; egotism and low self-esteem. Another example would be working sensibly. The two vices of working would be overworking and laziness. The middle option would be working sensibly. This, according to Aristotle, is the correct choice of action. He said

The Ethics of Human Trafficking
Words: 1665 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

Human TraffickingThe issue of human trafficking is one that poses substantial ethical concerns, which can be understood from a variety of philosophical perspectives�deontology, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics. Even from other moral standpoints, such as the moral standpoint of Christianity, human trafficking can be viewed as an unethical and immoral activity. Each approach allows for a different aspect of ethical understanding to be utilized so as to see how the issue

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now