Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative
Innumerable advancements and innovations have profoundly contributed to the betterment of the lives of the human race in the twenty first century. This trend of progression is surging ahead at a rapid pace; however, it is very unfortunate to declare that many of the social dilemmas also exist in this industrialized world that is making millions of residents suffer from its drastic outcomes. While taking the country of United States into consideration, the facts and figures statistical records apparently reveal the information that the nation is full of culturally diverse people that belong to different racial and ethnic groups (Holman & Ziedenberg, 2013).
In this diverse society, juvenile violence and crime has become one of widespread as well as prominent social issue with grave consequences. Due to the elevated crime rate (amongst the juveniles) within the country, detention is one of critical phases in the justice process, where a huge number of young adults are being held under the detention cells on a national basis. This kind of punishment largely leading to negative consequences and aftereffects amongst the juveniles that is demanding some better solutions that can lead to a bright future for the young adults, families, and communities on whole (Holman & Ziedenberg, 2013).
Juvenile detention alternative initiative (JDAI) is one of the solution programs that have been launched in the earlier years of the decade 1990 by the Annie E. Casey Foundation. This institute had constantly strived so that they can bring a positive human being out of the juveniles that has been involved in some sort of criminal activities and have been found eligible for detention under the justice system (The Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2013).
Therefore, they initiated the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) that can support their cause to provide opportunities to the juveniles (under detention) so that they can bring out positive and productive personalities out of them. The foundation has been well aware of the enduring harmful and negative consequences (on youth development as well as public safety) of the inappropriate detentions of the juveniles. Therefore, this program has been launched as one of effective, influential and widespread juvenile justice system reform initiatives on national basis (The Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2013).
Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative has been designed with the primary intention to cut down the unnecessary imprisonment or detention of the youth in the county. Indeed, this program is intended to focus on the well-being of the community while at the same time foster positive youth development with fairness and equality. Moreover, this program is also determined to eradicate racial and ethnic disparities that have been observed through the statistical records of juvenile detention records. Therefore, this program is a collaborative effort that is based on community engagement, shared accountability, and effective alternatives to detention as its essential tools (The Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2013).
The fundamental objectives with which Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiative has been designed include: (The Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2013)
Reduction and eradication of the inappropriate use of detention amongst the youths
Curtail re-arrest rates of the juveniles found guilty of crime and eligible for detention
Minimize failure rates of youths appearing to justice system that leads to pending adjudication
Ensure that the youths are being held under appropriate conditions in facilities during detention or imprisonment
Eliminate youth racial and ethnic inequalities when detained.
In order to achieve the core objective of juvenile detention alternative initiative (JDAI), the sites have developed eight interrelated strategies that facilitate in accomplishing the goals and overall vision of the program: (The Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2013)
1. Collaborative approach is the principal strategy that focuses on the partnership and alliance between major juvenile justice agencies, governmental bodies, and community organizations. These entities work as a team to address the reforms that is based on joint planning and policymaking.
2. Diagnoses of the issues of system as well evaluation of the impact of reforms are both essential and critical to accomplish the goals. However, these both aspects are achieved with the use of accurate data.
3. Objective admissions criteria and instruments are typically developed and used that can help in the decision making process for detentions at all points.
4. New, enhanced and better non-secure alternatives to detention need to be designed that can be implemented so that the options available for arrested youth can be increased to a significant level.
5. Case processing reforms needs to be established that can accelerate the flow of cases through the system. These changes must focus on the reduction...
Most boys stay fourteen days or less. Some are held while they are waiting for a bed in a treatment center. Some boys are bailed out by their parents and in other cases they are released by the judge. It depends on several factors, including the age of the offender, the level of crime, and whether it is a first or repeat offense. Eighty percent of cases do not
Juvenile Justice System - Contemporary Juvenile Justice System and Juvenile Detention Alternatives" by William W. Patton (2012) The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution extended the protections afforded by the Bill of Rights to all American citizens, including juveniles. Today, juveniles in the United States, though, are considered special cases that require a different adjudicative approach than that provided adult offenders, but it has not always been this way. In
Ideally, diversion should take place at the earliest stages of juvenile justice processing, to refer a youth to essential services and avert further involvement in the system. On the other hand, diversion mechanisms can be put into place at later stages of justice processing, to avoid further penetration into the system and expensive out-of-home placements. Efforts to keep youth out of the juvenile justice system who otherwise would be processed
This is particularly important when making decisions about court processes and sentencing practices in the juvenile court. The ability of youth to recognize that sanctions will drastically increase in the adult system is ample reason to justify the use of punishment in the juvenile system. Under a model that focuses on punishment, sentencing will need to be harsh enough to deter the youth from continued behavior but not so harsh
Dugan: Should be on its own page. Juvenile recidivism is a prevalent problem in the criminal justice system. Tackling reoffending remains a complex task requiring several strategies and aims. It involves research, acknowledgement of causes, factors, exploration, and evaluation of subgroups to generate long-term, positive changes in the lives of juvenile offenders. From gang violence to Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive (ICAP), researchers discover some of the reasons why juveniles
Title: Transforming the Future: The Need for Prison Reform Prison reform has become an increasingly important topic in discussions about justice, rehabilitation, and human rights. The current state of the prison system in many countries is characterized by overcrowding, poor living conditions, and high rates of recidivism. Many argue that these conditions are not only inhumane but also ineffective in terms of promoting rehabilitation and reducing crime. The primary goal of prison
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now