Juvenile Crime Issues in the Criminal Justice System
Similar to the concept of childhood, the legal idea of the juvenile justice system or status is relatively new. In the United States, the juvenile court system was established approximately 200 years ago with the first juvenile court instituted in 1899. Before the inception of the first juvenile court, children and the youth were regarded as small adults and were therefore prosecuted and punished as adults. Since the establishment of the first juvenile court, juveniles have largely been treated differently from adults though they are sometimes treated similarly in the criminal justice system. Consequently, there are several juvenile crime issues that have emerged in the criminal justice system as juvenile offenses have increased and the divergent treatment of juvenile offenders.
The Development of Juvenile Justice System:
Unlike the previous years, juvenile crimes and offenders are usually addressed in the juvenile justice system despite of the fact that some of them are treated in the adult criminal justice system. The juvenile court and justice system was established in the United States in 1899 when the first juvenile court was created in Illinois. The development of the juvenile justice system was largely fueled by the events of the progressive era between 1880 and 1920. During this period, social circumstances were mainly characterized by huge waves of immigration and the rapid increase of urbanization. Consequently, these characteristics contributed to several children wandering in the streets and many of them becoming engaged in criminal activities ("Development of the Juvenile Justice System," n.d.).
In the initial stages, most of these children were prosecuted and imprisoned with adult criminals upon conviction of the offenses. However, it was soon realized that these children were learning adult criminal behaviors and were leaving the facilities as individuals who were prepared for life-long careers in criminality. Due to the negative impact of the institutions, distinct juvenile court systems and correctional facilities were developed. Most of the early juvenile facilities and systems focused on teaching criminals life and trade skills. Nonetheless, other juvenile institutions focused on youth re-education, indefinite sentencing, and religious training. Since these early stages, the development and growth of the juvenile justice system can be attributed to several pivotal cases and juvenile crime issues that have emerged throughout its entire history.
Juvenile Crime:
Juvenile criminal activity has emerged as one of the crucial problems for the country as the federal, state, and local government officials as well as the general public are hugely concerned. The concerns regarding juvenile crime have increased dramatically because of the rapid increase in juvenile violence since the early 1990s. The concerns have not been alleviated and have continued to increase despite of the decrease in the juvenile crime rates since mid-1990s. The reason for the ongoing decline in the rate of juvenile crime emanate from the fact that many states started to adopt strict legislative policies. However, during the period when juvenile crime rates were declining significantly, federal reformers encouraged prevention and punitive measures and practices ("Introduction," 2001).
As juvenile violence has increased significantly in the recent past, the major response has been the adoption of laws that have continued to distort the difference between juvenile courts and adult correctional institutions. Nonetheless, most of the states have continued to fortify the laws regarding juvenile crime, made increased punitive sentencing, and extended the permitted transfer of juveniles to criminal or adult courts. In certain cases, some of these state governments have eliminated the confidentiality protections of juvenile courts.
Differences between Juvenile Courts and Adult Courts:
Since there is a clear distinction between the juvenile justice system and the adult criminal justice system, there are differences between a juvenile court and an adult court. Some of the major differences between a juvenile court and an adult court include:
Terminologies:
One of the main distinctions between these courts is the terminology that is used in the proceedings...
Criminals in the adult criminal justice system are often likely to be career criminals. Moreover, simply to survive in an adult institution, juveniles may have to adopt increasingly anti-social behavior. If the goal is to keep these children from reoffending, putting them in the same system as more experienced criminals, which does not have a deterrence effect on the adults in that system, simply seems like the wrong approach. The
Criminal Justice System Australian Criminal Justice System "When all is said and done, the current criminal justice system is about as fair and effective as we can reasonably expect" Overview of the Criminal Justice System: Fair and Effective - Penal Populism The Democracy at Work thesis proposes that politicians have been properly responsive to public concern about crime by putting into place the more robust responses to offending which people want. An alternative perspective
The actual court proceedings in a juvenile court consist of the arrest procedure, search and seizure, and custodial interrogation (Calderon 2006). The concept has been that the delinquent is a child rather than a criminal. Hence, rehabilitation rather than punishment is the court and the system's goal. But the major aspects of the juvenile justice system continue to hound its supporters. One is the cause of serious juvenile crime. Another
Juvenile Court Juvenile criminal justice system has enforced laws, which govern the rules for determining whether a juvenile criminal is eligible for a sentence or a counseling period is mandatory to alter the behaviors of such individuals. This system has been effectively placed for children less than the age of 21 who have reportedly committed crimes in various forms such as sex offenders; murderers etc. (Whitehead & Lab, 2012). In this
Criminal Justice: The Death Penalty Reasons for topic selection Causes of racial prejudice and discrimination Juvenile in delinquent society theory Culture and values Official and unofficial values The effectiveness of the death penalty The death penalty is irreversible The death penalty is barbaric Changes to the death sentence Implemented changes Sentencing guidelines Bifurcated trials Automatic appellate conviction review Proportionality review The importance of proposed changes Anticipated outcome Life imprisonment; alternative to death sentences The costs Decency standards Overall efficiency Policies in support of incarceration Conclusion References Background Despite the controversy over how effective it is
Criminal justice administration mainly focuses on crime prevention and punishing any illegal activities. Criminal justice administration is wide and it entails law enforcement and the judicial administration. Some of the jobs that relate to criminal justice administration include; security coordination, juvenile delinquency administration, law enforcement and being a courtroom official. Additional crime is also part of criminal justice administration. This field entails terrorism prevention, immigration policies and social policies. Other
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now