Judicial activism has had a profound effect on American society. Some examples of judicial activism include: Brown v. Board of Education—the 1954 Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that segregation was a violation of the Constitution and thus public schools were desegregated. Roe v. Wade is another example: this 1973 Supreme Court case made abortion legal. These examples fundamentally altered the character and fabric of society in ways that continue to have repercussions even to this very day.
The Constitution allows judges to play an activist role because ultimately the framers of the Constitution recognized how important and crucial the judiciary branch of the government would be. Just as the executive and the legislative branches can be activist, so too can and ought to be the judiciary branch. Judicial officials are often misrepresented as being impartial, but the reality is that they are not impartial but rather very partial—partial towards the law and the intention of the law as described in the Constitution (S.M., 2015). When it becomes clear through whatever tensions exist in society that the judiciary branch must take an active stance on an issue and clarify it for the public in the light of the what the Constitution says and intends, judicial activism can be witnessed—and that is perfectly in line with what the original framers of the Constitution had in mind. The idea of checks and balances is only really manifested when judges play an activist role. They must, in fact, play an activist role because otherwise the Constitution and the interpretation of it will simply fade away into nothingness because of a lack of presence, assertiveness, and activism on the part of those who occupy the benches and wield the gavels.
References
S.M. (2015). Those ‘activist’ judges. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2015/07/judicial-politics-0
Kelo V. New London Judicial Activism Kelo V. City of New London and Judicial Activism Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005) analyzes the issue of eminent domain and the circumstances under which a city or government can use this to seize an individual's property. In Kelo v. City of New London (2005), Susette Kelo sued the city of New London claiming that her property, and the properties of
Understanding the Judiciary: Activism, Restraint, and PowerThe judiciary is one of the three main parts of our government, and its role is to interpret and apply the law. However, people do not always agree on how it should do this. Some people think that courts have become too powerful and that judges are making laws from the bench, a concept known as judicial activism (Roosevelt, 2008). Others believe that courts
For example, the EP has the right to bring an action for failure to act, and can also take action to have the ECJ review acts of the Council or the Commission. Despite those protections, the ECJ determined that the legal remedies provided for in the Euratom Treaty and EEC treaty might be ineffective or uncertain. For example, an action for failure to act cannot be used to challenge a measure
Federalist What is a faction? Where in modern American politics do we see factions? How does Madison propose to quell the impact of factions in government? In Federalist 10, James Madison discussed the types of factions, parties and interest groups that result from differences in wealth and property, as well as differences of opinion in religion, politics or ideology. He thought that differences in wealth and rank, at least those not
Judicial activists like Chief Justice Earl Warren used their power to invoke the Constitution in social changes like school desegregation. They believe the government must stay current with the times and change, rather than become archaic. Capital punishment is one of the most hotly debated punishments in our judicial system. That is because it is a very emotional issue, and both sides are equally convinced their ideas are right. Because
The first amendment to the Constitution in the Bill of Rights states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." This provision has been the justification for entirely removing prayer from schools and the mention of God from public places. This may not have been the intention of the Framers. They were concerned that the government could not establish an
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now