Verified Document

Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics And Term Paper

Related Topics:

Or if a robbery occurred and among the suspects was a black person, what is the likelihood of people accusing him of the offence. Very high, we would say. This is because of availability and stereotypical connection between people of minorities and crime. In this heuristic again, five kinds of errors or biases can emerge: 1. Some errors are purely theoretical in nature. The two events may not be as related to each other as were initially assumed. For example all Muslims with beard are not fanatic or extremists but there is a likelihood that these two would go together in a person's mind.

2. People with show insensitivity to previous results. They may fail to take into account prior probability outcomes and instead rely on their own judgment based on representative-ness.

3. No attention to the size of the group examined. In other words, people tend to foget about sample sizes. They feel that a result that was true for a group of 50 would also be true for a group of 500 and this can lead to errors in judgment.

4. Inability to understand the role of chance. Tversky and Kahneman maintain that, "people expect that a sequence of events generated by a random process will represent the essential characteristics of that process even when the sequence is short"

5. Misconceptions about regression and their role in the judgment process. People may often be so heavily influenced by representative-ness that they may forget law of regression completely. Hence people "do not expect regression in many contexts where it is bound to occur... (and) when they recognize the occurrence of regression, they often invent spurious causal explanations for it"

The third heuristic of anchoring comes into play when adjustment or estimates are being calculated. When a person is to depend on calculation of probabilities or assigning of the same, they may not...

This is called anchoring where people anchor their estimates to the starting point, which is always bigger to them than the latter. Interestingly the authors with the help of two sequences have illustrated this:
8 x 7 x 6 x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1 or

1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 x 7 x 8

They argue that when given separately, people are more likely to assume that the first one will produce a bigger result than the second one, though in this case, they are both equal. The authors found that in their tests, they learned that there was a wide gap between the probabilities of 'A' being higher in people's minds than B. The estimated answer for the first was 2250 while for the second it was merely 512. Thus we can say that if the first event or whatever were the starting point, was bigger and more dramatic, people are likely to stay closer to it then any minor event later on. This can be explained with the help of September 11 attacks. Since these attacks were dramatic and massive in magnitude, their impact on judgment would be greater than any efforts made by Muslim countries to counter terrorism. Thus in calculating the likelihood of a terrorist being a Muslim, people will stay closer to September 11 events than to efforts made later on.

These heuristics do play important roles but they cannot be considered the ultimate. There are many people who wouldn't resort to anchoring in order to reach a more objective result. The repeated messages rejecting anchoring may indeed push some people away from it and lean more towards the other extreme. For example though France lost major soccer final last year, what is the likelihood of people associating their adjustments with that one loss. Very low indeed. People are more likely to see the whole record and then reach an accurate judgment. We understand that heuristics…

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Supply Chain Planning Under Uncertainty:
Words: 12190 Length: 44 Document Type: Research Proposal

Results from the study by Petersen, Ragatz and Monczka show that effective collaborative planning depends on information quality, and the trust level firms share. The authors purport: "Collaborative planning activities between supply chain partners are expected to lead to better performing supply chains" (Petersen, Ragatz & Monczka, Introduction section ¶ 1). In addition, numerous other researchers have also explored the perception relating to supplier alliances, that enhanced collaborative planning

Personality Traits A the Conscientious
Words: 1410 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Extroverted managers enjoy most high-stress decision-making situations. They may are prone to the errors typical of managers who make decisions quickly and rely on biases and heuristics, but the stress level of the situation is less a factor. These managers are more stressed by having to spend long hours researching and carefully considering decisions. They will have made up their mind early in the process and not understand the point

Psychological and Socio-Cultural Theories of Risk
Words: 4457 Length: 13 Document Type: Essay

Psychological and Socio-Cultural Theories of Risk Definition of Risk The term "risk" is often defined differently depending on the particular paradigm. For example, risk is economics is typically defined in terms of differences in possible monetary outcomes and individuals/corporations involved in risk -- seeking behavior are typically seeking higher monetary payoffs (Markowitz 1952). When clinical psychologists, sociologists, law enforcement officials, and lay individuals identify "risky behaviors" they are referring to a broader

Behavioral Finance Human Interaction a Study of the Decision-Making...
Words: 22258 Length: 81 Document Type: Term Paper

Behavioral Finance and Human Interaction a Study of the Decision-Making Processes Impacting Financial Markets Understanding the Stock Market Contrasting Financial Theories Flaws of the Efficient Market Hypothesis Financial Bubbles and Chaos The stock market's dominant theory, the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) has been greatly criticized recently for its failure to account for human errors, heuristic bias, use of misinformation, psychological tendencies, in determining future expected performance and obtainable profits. Existing evidence indicates that past confidence in the

Specific Categorical Imperative
Words: 2614 Length: 9 Document Type: Term Paper

free will and whether we can ever attain individuality, or whether lack of free will constrains us from ever achieving the individuality that we wish to achieve. On the one hand, we believe that we are gifted with the ability to choose happiness and liberty would we so wish and create ourselves into the individuals that we believe is necessary for our life's liberty and contentment. On the other hand,

Identification and Analysis of Unethical Criminal Conduct Following...
Words: 15769 Length: 57 Document Type: Term Paper

Unethical/Criminal Conduct following the Equities Market Crash 2000 to 2002 This paper is a discussion of the identification and analysis of unethical and criminal conduct following the equities market crash from 2000 to 2002. The paper begins with an Introduction to the problem in Chapter One that also contains the hypothesis for the paper, the definition of terms section, and other valuable information. This information sets up the rest of

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now