John is basing his decision strictly on consequentialism, whereas Mary's perspective is more nuanced and includes both duty-based and rights-based points-of-view. Ethical consequentialism focuses solely on the outcomes of the situation, which is why John is concerned only with the client's smoking status. For John, getting the client to quit is more important than any other ethical objective. John understands also that the consequences of smoking are deadly, which is an underlying cause for his ethical stance. Mary's point-of-view is different. Although she sees John's side of things, she also understands several points about ethical decision-making. For one, both Mary and John are health educators in a community clinic. As such, they are professionals and are held to certain standards. Their professional status obliges them to work within ethical guidelines and legal frameworks. In other words, Mary and John have a duty to fulfill their professional obligations. Mary would prefer to find some way other than lying to help the client quit. In this way, Mary works with a duty-based non-consequentialist framework. However, Mary also bases her decision on a rights-based ethical framework. Unlike John, Mary believes that all clients have the right to truthful, accurate, and honest...
The first is that the ethical tenor of an act "depends only on the results of that act," and the second is that the "more good consequences an act produces, the better or more right that act," (BBC, 2014). In this case, John works primarily with the former principle. The results of lying to the client would, at least in John's head, be improved health prognosis for the client. John cannot be certain that the "fear tactic" will work, but he believes that it is worth a try because to refrain from using the fear tactic might lead to the client's death. John uses what is known as "expectable consequentialism," which presumes, "the morally right action is the action whose reasonably expectable consequences are best," (Haines, n.d.). Considering that it would be wrong to allow a client to die without doing everything possible to prevent it, John bases his ethical reasoning on a strict consequentialist point-of-view.
From this came our insistence on the drama of the doorstep" (cited by Hardy 14-15). Grierson also notes that the early documentary filmmakers were concerned about the way the world was going and wanted to use all the tools at hand to push the public towards greater civic participation. With the success of Drifters, Grierson was able to further his ideas, but rather than directing other films, he devoted his time
Decision House Lords The Decision by the House of Lords in the Belmarsh Detainees Case The decision by the House of Lords in the Belmarsh detainees case (A v Secretary of State Home Office [2004] UKHL 56) illustrates the increased intensity of judicial review under the Human Rights Act. Discuss the judicial reasoning in this case in the light of the above statement. The ruling of the Belmarsh detainees' case was seen as
76). As automation increasingly assumes the more mundane and routine aspects of work of all types, Drucker was visionary in his assessment of how decisions would be made in the years to come. "In the future," said Drucker, "it was possible that all employment would be managerial in nature, and we would then have progressed from a society of labor to a society of management" (Witzel, p. 76). The
Performance Improvement Plan For The John Hopkins Hospital The John Hopkins Hospital Patient Care and Safety I. Purpose and Quality Statement: II. Patient safety can be defined as the measures to prevent errors and negative effects that often arise from healthcare actions (WHO, 2017). The healthcare sector has seen lots of changes and improvements in technology use, accompanied with effectiveness in service provision. There are new medicines and treatments in use too. Healthcare
In this case, Mary would have acted precisely as she did, that is, pursuing her personal happiness and acting according to a pattern she had established before, that of being virtuous and always acting morally. In this case, the decision is plain and easy to take: Mary has to be virtuous so as to satisfy her own moral demands and ensure her emotional and spiritual comfort. Thus, she acts
They predict age and gender variations relate to bullying concerns. Of the 25 cartoons implemented in the study, two depict characters with different shades of skin color where skin color appeared to be an issue. One cartoon relating to sexual orientation was not used in several countries. Smith et al. report Olweus to assert bullying to be characterized by the following three criteria: 1. It is aggressive behavior or intentional
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now