¶ … Whistle Blowing
Introduction and History of Whistle Blowing
Whistle blowing is the revealing of immoral, illegal or illegitimate deeds to authorities. The authorities may be insiders or from outside the affected organization. Many cases of whistle blowing involve people revealing information to outsiders especially media organizations or pressure groups about an act they consider to be irresponsible, irregular or illegal (Robbins, 1993).
Cases of whistle blowing have increased dramatically in the recent past but the practice began way back in the 1970s (Shimabukuro & Whitaker, 2012). Scandals involving big corporations and that have led to the collapse of such organizations such as WorldCom and Enron among others come to mind (Minks, 2010). The U.S. Federal government has since enacted several statutes tailored at dealing with the problem.
This paper therefore aims at discussing these laws. Three whistle blowing cases involving the government and another three involving corporations will also be discussed. We will close by highlighting the impact that WikiLeaks has had as well as the contributions made by Edward Snowden.
Laws of Whistle Blowing
There are several operational laws whose goal is to protect whistle blowers. The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, for example, was the first case where such protections were adopted to protect employees of the federal government (Shimabukuro & Whitaker, 2012). It was necessary to have this law as it had been realized that these employees could have been victimized if they blew any whistle and people came to know of it. The coming into law of the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 opened a new chapter as far as whistle blowing is concerned. (Shimabukuro & Whitaker, 2012).
This law seeks to protect all employees of the federal government who might reveal illegitimate activities done by federal officials. Provisions like protected disclosure and covered employee are present in the law so as to ensure that they are not victimized. Further, this law has been assimilated in 19 trade federal laws (Shimabukuro & Whitaker, 2012). The statutes have laid out the correct procedure for reporting misconduct by government employees.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 ensures that top tier executives in a company do not escape culpability by feigning ignorance of the on goings in the firm (Miks, 2010). The legislation allows for the conviction of the corporate on account of misconduct or acts that can compromise the entire economy's performance. Arrogant executives should especially be treated suspiciously as there should be benchmarks for measuring a company's performance for the sake of all stakeholders and investors (Miks, 2010).
With the aim of advancing transparency as well as attracting funding, public companies ought to always be ready for scrutiny and accountability. Doing otherwise would give the impression that a company is making an effort to hide some dirt from theirs investors, stakeholders and shareholders. Some company executives do manipulate company financials so as to appear attractive in the eyes of investors (Miks, 2010).
Government Cases of Whistle Blowing
Several cases of whistle blowing involving the government exist. A perfect example is the National Security Agency (NSA) case. An employee of NSA, Edward Snowden, leaked sensitive secrets concerning the NSA surveillance efforts in the year 2013. Edward considered such information discomforting. Interestingly, also in the included in the dossier were government secrets (Snowden, 2013).
A legal response was thus made by the government to Snowden and he was charged with theft of government property, unauthorized communication of national defense information, and willful communication of classified intelligence with unauthorized person. Two of the charges are under the Espionage Act (Snowden, 2013). Federal officials have said that resultant damages caused by the leakage would need billions of dollars to remedy (Snowden, 2013).
Another example of whistle blowing in government involved a police detective named, Frank Serpico. Frank is now retired and living on pension. However, during his career he exposed corruption that had been rampant in the New York Police Department during the 1970s (Lewis, 2014). He told the public about the rot and corruption in the police force and how the cops were being compromised by criminals such as drug dealers and murderers (Lewis, 2014).
The cops were being bribed and they played a huge role in covering these crimes. Serpico had been concerned about the integrity of an institution whose mandate was to serve the interests of the public and not criminals. He argued that when such an institution...
There is an increasing recognition of this not only among investigators and regulators, but also among businesses and employees alike. Clearly, the general attitude of employers and employees towards whistle blowing is changing with time. Generally, this is the result of consequences generated by corporate wrongdoing, and also by the increase of importance attached to ethical business practices. Corporate responsibility in terms of both society and the environment has seen
A suggestion within the company, or a well-spoken word can often end the problem before going public with it is necessary ("Ethical Dissent," n.d.). The thought behind this is that whistle blowing, or drawing public attention to an issue, actually makes a problem worse, when privately addressing could make it better. In addition, those who condemn the practice may also mention the negative professional consequences, such as firing, that
However the problem occurs when the person purchasing at the shampoo at supermarket becomes a reseller and offers it with a small discount to the elite buyer. This kind of price discrimination is common but it can become illegal if it violates the pricing laws of the country in which discrimination occurred (Ferrell et al. p. 288). It is also illegal if segmentation is not possible in the market
Whistle-Blower Case Study Based on Oklahoma Law It may appear common-sense that Janet and Darla are whistle-blowers; they saw something wrong at their workplace (another employee potentially stealing drugs and committing fraud), and notified their employer. However, while they may have effectively blown the whistle on potential fraud, they are also working in a state with "at will" employment laws, which states employers can fire employees for any reason (Bennett-Alexander &
In healthcare organizations, ethical principles have been emphasized mostly through procedures and mission statements. The numerous oaths (Hippocratic Oath) and declarations found in healthcare institutions have stated principles and values, and this has formed the basis for ethical practices. The works of such ethical principles include and are not limited to nonmaleficence, beneficence, confidentiality, respect for the autonomy of patients, and justice (Gabel, 2011). The ethical principles of an organization that
Alma Joseph's case study, "The Dilemma Public Service Department" Public Performance & Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, March 2001, pp. 285-287-Attached pdf This case study analysis paper approximately 3 full pages (double-spaced, 1" margins, 12 pt font), address issues: In terms administrative responsibilities, mind case: honesty, malfeasance, misfeasance, nonfeasance, accountability, competence, . Honesty is certainly one of the primary concepts that come to mind when considering Alex and
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now