Verified Document

Israel Illegal Israel And Resolution 242 You Essay

Israel Illegal Israel and Resolution 242

You say it's "funny" that people you disagree with are, according to your own view, hypocritical and wrong. I don't find it especially amusing, nor do I think the rather disingenuous way you go about making claims of fact that can easily be disproven -- as though you are used to debating people who don't actually read documents, and thus like to make generalizations about an entire viewpoint/those who hold it based on the pool of ignorance you self-select -- is itself "funny." I think it is sad, in fact, that instead of being able to approach this rationally and acknowledge that there are decades of disagreement precisely because the language of Resolution 242 is not entirely clear, you try to insist that your interpretation is the "obvious" correct one. Leaving aside for a moment the concrete details of this resolution and the records of its intended meaning an interpretation from the debate and discussion surrounding the resolution itself, there is a serious problem in the way you approach this debate.

Clearly you think your position is the most reasonable conclusion based on the available evidence; there would be no reason for you to hold this belief if this were not the case. Ridiculing the other side of the argument and making false assumptions about that perspective does not strengthen your evidence or your position, but rather makes your person seem ineffectual and your arguments seem adolescent. I would again ask you to actually refer to facts and cite evidence rather than trying to make this...

Your attempts to define the debate in this manner and your repeated assertions in this regard are only to your detriment, as you and your arguments seem more ridiculous for these efforts.
Turning to the actual issues at hand, though, as it is my hope we will be able to do for the remainder of this exchange, you are certainly correct that Resolution 242 explicitly does not contain the word "all." I have no intention of invoking the French version of the resolution (I won't give you any "nonsense" about that, so you may cease your angst-ridden agitation), however I find it rather odd if not, to use your term, intellectually dishonest to suggest that your interpretation of Resolution 242 as meaning Israel can stay in some territories because the word "all" is missing is somehow less of a "word/grammar game" than the conflicting interpretation, namely that Israel should leave all of the occupied territories precisely because nothing in the resolution grants them the authority or the right to remain occupants of these territories. That is, you are ridiculing and denigrating one side of this debate by accusing them of playing "word games" with this resolution and their insistence that the word "all" is implied, when your interpretation of the missing "all" as meaningful requires far more word-specific dissection and manipulation.

A quick look at the actual text of the resolution might be helpful. The relevant clause reads:

…the fulfilment [sic] of the Charter principles requires the…

Sources used in this document:
References

UN Security Council. (1967). Resolution 242. Accessed 7 May 2012. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/240/94/IMG/NR024094.pdf-OpenElement

UN Security Council. (1967). Resolution 242. Accessed 7 May 2012. 1382nd Meeting: Official Records. Accessed 9 May 2012. http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/9F5F09A80BB6878B0525672300565063
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Israel Internal Security Case Study
Words: 3974 Length: 15 Document Type: Case Study

What are the recognized threats Recognized threats on a national and international level include, expansion of international terrorism, as a result of universal fundamentalist Arab calls for violence against those who oppress Arabs. Israel is at the center of this conflict as the most regionally active, non-Arab state and as a result of historical actions taken by it to maintain itself and its territories, both recognized and occupied. Short contemporary history of

Camp David Negotiations Between Israel
Words: 3090 Length: 9 Document Type: Term Paper

208). Begin could tell the Israeli community that the Egyptian made extreme demands and the Americans didn't handle the negotiations very well. Begin's more "militant supporters" in Israel would back him up no matter the outcome, Quandt explains (p. 208). A for Sadat, he believed that he and Carter already had a preliminary agreement that would "force the Israelis to make significant concessions"; hence, Sadat would put "all his cards

Palestinian and Israeli Conflict in
Words: 3918 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

These settlements make sure that the state of fragmentation and insecurity of the Palestinians continues and thereby hinders the economic, social and political development of the Palestinians. The total number of such settlements in the West bank, Jerusalem and the Gaza strip are 205, with the vast majority of them in West bank and Jerusalem. "These settlements have led to the more than 403,249 settlers in the West bank

Sociology and Sports and Race
Words: 2030 Length: 7 Document Type: Term Paper

politics that suggests the making of the New World Order. This paper provides evidence for this statement between the lines. In addition, the paper discusses the foreign policies of United States towards Israel and Iraq within the historical and the current context. POLITICAL SCIENCE Any country's foreign policy towards other states is symbolic of common goals of the two. Moreover, any foreign policy is shaped by a country's interests in that

Iran Instability in Iran in Talking About
Words: 12907 Length: 31 Document Type: Dissertation or Thesis complete

Iran Instability in Iran In talking about the influence that Iran's nuclear program has on the overall stability in the region of Middle East, it is essential to tell apart between the cycles of time relevant to Iranian quest for nuclear weapons acquisition as well as the Iranian realization and application of nuclear weapons systems. Both cycles should be thought about distinctly simply because they are very different when it comes to

Post War Iraq a Paradox in the Making Legitimacy Vs. Legality
Words: 14187 Length: 35 Document Type: Term Paper

Post War Iraq: A Paradox in the Making: Legitimacy vs. legality The regulations pertaining to the application of force in International Law has transformed greatly from the culmination of the Second World War, and again in the new circumstances confronting the world in the aftermath of the end of the Cold War. Novel establishments have been formed, old ones have withered away and an equally enormous quantity of intellectual writing has

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now