Verified Document

Is Stop And Frisk Racial Profiling  Term Paper

Stop and Frisk: The Efficacy of This Technique Stop and frisk is one of the most controversial techniques used by the NYPD to reduce crime. Stop and frisk, as its name suggests, is when police officers stop pedestrians on the street and frisk them for drugs, weapons, and other illegal substances. On the surface, it might seem as if this is a violation of the Fourth Amendment which prohibits searches and seizures without probable cause. Almost by definition, stop and frisks are conducted without adhering to usual standards of probable cause since they are usually made relatively randomly at police discretion with only minor evidence of an infraction. Furthermore, the NYPD's specific stop and frisk program was recently declared unconstitutional but not primarily based on the Fourth Amendment. According to the district court judge the policy was "discriminatory, and showed little regard for the requirement that stops be based on rational grounds. It had led repeatedly to violations of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments" (Bergner 1). Concerns about racial profiling in the stops were the primary reason for the judge's ruling (Bergner 1). The decision, however, is likely to be appealed.

Stop and frisks are usually justified by the U.S. Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio which allowed non-obtrusive pat-downs. "The exclusionary rule cannot properly be invoked to exclude the products of legitimate and restrained police investigative techniques, and this Court's approval of such techniques should not discourage remedies other than the exclusionary rule to curtail police abuses for which that is not an effective sanction"...

Ohio, 1967). An analogy might be made with random traffic stops for drunk driving of cars in high-risk areas during times when people are known to be drinking. However, the Terry decision still requires the policy to carry out such policies in a manner that is not discriminatory and protects subjects' civil rights.
New York City adopted stop and frisk policies during the Giuliani Administration, as an extension of the popular 'broken window' theory which underlined the need to keep a substantial police presence in at-risk communities as a means of constant deterrence. Since then, "in cities across the country, stop-and-frisk strategies have gained great currency. They aim to get guns off the street, to glean information and solve crime sprees, and, perhaps above all, to act as a deterrent, by letting criminals and would-be lawbreakers know that they might find themselves getting a pat-down at any given moment" (Bergner 1). In its NYC incarnation, stop-and-frisk is ostensibly random and is universally applied to see if the targets have illegal weapons or otherwise pose a danger to the community.

However, there has been a great deal of resistance to the campaign even before the court ruling. First, a number of people have called it ineffective. "In 2011, the NYPD recorded 686,000 stops. Only about 12% ended in an arrest or a summons" (Bergner 2014). Secondly, and more seriously, there is the allegation that is conducted in a manner that racially profiles certain individuals. According to the most recent available data on the program, "in 2013, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 191,558…

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited

Bergner, D. "Is stop and frisk worth it?" The Atlantic. Mar 2014. [20 Mar 2014]

http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2014/03/is-stop-and-frisk-worth-it/358644/

"Stop and frisk data." NY Civil Liberties Union. [20 Mar 2014]

http://www.nyclu.org/content/stop-and-frisk-data
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/392/1
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Racial Profiling Is Not New, However, and
Words: 1036 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Racial profiling is not new, however, and was a theory of sociology in the late 19th century known as Social Darwinism. Incorrectly using Darwin's theory of evolution, the Social Darwinists believed that some species were morally superior to others, and even some races superior to othersJohnson () Public perception, though, believes in favor of seeing race as a reason for crime, and having a considerable fear of anyone outside their own

Racial Profiling Just This Past
Words: 2189 Length: 7 Document Type: Term Paper

Detroit has also joined Los Angeles and Chicago in having such a regulation. A similar bill was attempted unsuccessfully thus far in Texas (2001). Responding to the concerns of organizations that represent Hispanics, Muslims and individuals of Arab descent, the Detroit City Council unanimously recently approved an ordinance that prohibits city officials from profiling people based on their appearance, race and similar factors. The regulation also bans city officials from

Racial Profiling Four Different Perspectives
Words: 2585 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

The individual who learns the intensity of the racial hatred that exists through experiential learning knows that it is never wise to walk amongst the roses with one's head in the clouds just thinking or dreaming because living in the world meant watching at all times for approaching insult, breach of rights, danger and even death due to racial profiling. III. Perspective Two: The Public Official The public official is ever

Racial Profiling American Society Has
Words: 2857 Length: 9 Document Type: Research Paper

For the past several decades the emphasis in policing has been building trust in the community. Making the streets safe for everyone requires mutual cooperation between the general public and the police. Without community support, the police cannot do it alone. In this regard, respect as been shown to be a better tool for decreasing crime than fear and when fear is present residents tend to avoid contact with

Racial Profiling and Police
Words: 685 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

Racial Profiling: An Overview of the Debate According to the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), racial profiling is one of the most controversial issues in America today. The data is clear that there is a stronger perception within many historically discriminated-against minority groups that profiling goes on and this has had a negative impact on community-police relations. Although data suggests that often members of minority groups perceive themselves as singled out

Explaining Racial Profiling
Words: 3138 Length: 8 Document Type: Essay

Race and Arrests Racial Profiling, according to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), is a "longstanding and deeply troubling national problem." It involves police and private security personnel targeting people of color based on suspicions, in most cases, that the individual being targeted is up to something illegal. The ACLU states that racial profiling "occurs every day," and the result for the innocent person of color is often a "frightening detention,

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now