Verified Document

Is No Child Left Behind Irretrievably Flawed  Research Paper

No Child Left Behind The law which is known as No Child Left Behind, or NCLB, was created to help students in the United States. When the law was written, it was intended that schools would be held to a high standard. Students would each have specific standards based on their grade which would better ensure that all American children have more equal education (Noll 2012,-page 402). The intent is also to make sure teachers are highly skilled and putting the greatest amount of effort into their work. New technologies are incorporated into the classroom and used to enhance the learning experience and funding is increased or decreased based on the level of the school's success on exams overall. It is designed to hold schools accountable for the education that they provide to their students; it is good-intentioned. This sounds like a wonderful idea; however, the NCLB law is highly flawed because the systems in place to secure quality also cause hurt to schools that are already troubled and underprivileged.

In an article titled "Unacceptable: My School and My Students are Labeled as Failures," teacher Amy Ambrosio explains why NCLB is flawed (2003). Students need to pass tests in order for the school to get funding from the government, which in turn dictates how well the students do later on in their academic careers. If the students do not do well on their standardized tests, then the school is punished financially. It has been proven that students from lower-income areas do more poorly on such...

Parts of this document are hidden

View Full Document
svg-one

These schools really need more money than those in higher-income areas, but the standardized tests punish them. Consequently NCLB punishes the very students it was designed to assist.
Since so much emphasis is put on the test, the teachers are also put into a very difficult situation. They either have to teach to the test or risk losing their jobs and having the district be taken over by the state. Teachers and education administration are pressured to get the test scores up or risk being taken over by the government and the loss of many jobs. This has led to problems all over the country. For example, "In Texas many public school districts have found raising their standardized testing averages to be the No. 1 goal of classroom curriculum. Consequently, schools is no longer a forum where students can discuss the effects of alcohol, or the best method to achieve a life filled with value and pleasure, or the simple antics of their daily lives" (Noll 2012,-page 407). This is just one state but it is an attitude that is found all over the country. NCLB leaves the schools and educators more or less hand tied over what can be taught and what must be done.

Instead of seeing a problem in the system that judges them, the government has labeled schools which cannot solve this issue as "unacceptable" (Ambrosio 2003). The students in low income areas all have some…

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited

Ambrosio, A. (2003). Unacceptable: my school and my students are labeled as failures.

Noll, J. (2012). Issue 23: is no child left behind irretrievably flawed? Taking Sides: Clashing

Views on Educational Issues, Expanded. McGraw-Hill / Dushkin. 402-15.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

No Child Left Behind Act-
Words: 4609 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

(No Child Left behind Act Aims to Improve Success for All Students and Eliminate the Achievement Gap) Parents will also gain knowledge regarding how the quality of learning is happening in their child's class. They will get information regarding the progress of their child vis-a-vis other children. Parents have of late been given the privilege to ask for information regarding the level of skills of the teachers. It offers parents

No Child Left Behind Act
Words: 998 Length: 3 Document Type: Thesis

III. Other Issues and Challenges The No Child Left Behind act is viewed by many if not most of today's teachers as having tunnel vision and that acknowledges little but standardized testing outcomes. Specifically reported by Dillon (2009) in the 2009 New York Times article entitled: "No Child Law Is Not Closing a Racial Gap" that there has not been a narrowing of the gap between white and minority students in

No Child Left Behind Act
Words: 4890 Length: 16 Document Type: Term Paper

These authors note that the obstacles for ELL students are particularly challenging, given that they include both educational and technical issues. These challenges include the following: Historically low ELL performance and very slow improvement. State tests show that ELL students' academic performance is far below that of other students, oftentimes 20 to 30 percentage points lower, and usually shows little improvement across many years. Measurement accuracy. Research shows that the language

No Child Left Behind Act
Words: 1984 Length: 7 Document Type: Term Paper

There are over 4.4 million ELs enrolled in U.S. public schools, a number that has doubled during the last decade, making ELs roughly 10% of the total enrollment nationwide (Conrad 2005). The demographic increases demonstrate to government agencies that more needs to be done to support and ensure their integration and success in the educational process, and standardized testing in English is the least appropriate way to meet their

No Child Left Behind Act
Words: 599 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

In principle, it is now believed that the traditional emphasis on passive learning through lectures and textbook methods of instruction are far less effective than active methods of academic instruction. Whereas modern educators have been pushing for public education systems to move away from passive learning methods, the NCLB creates the exact opposite incentive: to waste classroom modules memorizing information for the test and practicing test-taking instead of learning

No Child Left Behind Act.
Words: 999 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Proposal

Review and Comment Indications suggest that Obama will endorse a rewritten version of No Child Left Behind once requirements like teacher quality and academic standards are toughened up to focus more attention on failing schools. This will mean more, not less, federal involvement in the program. Overall, reaction to Obama's plans are negative. Most who were opposed to Bush's policy had hoped for a brand new start rather than a rehash

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now