IRAC: Stoll v. Runyon
Issue
Issue 2
Cynthia Stoll was subjected to both quid pro quo sexual harassment and a hostile workplace environment at the Sacramento Post Office. In recognition of the psychological and physical trauma she had experienced, Stoll requested “back pay with interest and front pay until her normal retirement age, as well as the payment of her attorney's fees” (Stoll v. Runyon, p.1241). The Post Office refused to award front pay.
Issue 2
Stoll contended she was eligible for disability benefits due to the fact her psychological disturbances were trigged by her harassment.
Rule
Rule 1
The Office of Federal Operations (OFO) and the US Post Office both refused to award front pay, given that Stoll had been so psychologically debilitated by her experience she might not work again and argued that front pay in this instance would be tantamount to compensatory damages which were barred under Title VII at the time.
Rule 2
The USPO and OFO alleged that Stoll had filed her claim for disability benefits after the statute of limitations had expired.
Analysis 1
Compensatory damages were not permitted under Title VII.
Analysis 2
It was found that given that Stoll’s failure to respond in a timely manner for her disability benefits was a directly-caused symptom of her psychological incapacity, the court ruled that it was wrong for the USPO to effectively benefit from the disability that had been triggered by her employment, which rendered her unable to open her mail at times due to extreme anxiety (hence the delay in filing for disability benefits). Equitable tolling is permitted even when a client has a lawyer in the interests of justice. “The only claimed prejudice that the Post Office alleges is that it would not have paid Stoll's attorney's fees had it known that she intended to pursue her front pay claim,” but the Office would have been obligated to pay the claim anyway (Stoll v. Runyon, p.1242).
Conclusion
Stoll was awarded disability benefits, based upon the harassment she had experienced.
What I Learned
Statutes of limitation can be waived under good faith and extreme instances, such as this one, in which the defendant was prevented from benefiting from the psychological damage he or she triggered in the plaintiff.
Work Cited
Stoll v. Runyon, 1238-1243.
Sexual harassment is not something that has a sole effect on the accuser and the victim. This type of behavior has an influence on everything around them. Sexual harassment policies are put in practice to make sure there is a safe environment and lessen employer liability. There are approaches that can be performed in order to display the commitment that is from people in high places. With that said, this
Sexual Harassment Should a person (employer or employees) be held liable for unintentional sexual harassment? If yes, under what circumstances? If no, under what circumstances? Give examples of particular cases that address both circumstances. Sexual harassment is defined as "any verbal or physical behavior with sexual connotations that brings discomfort or degrades the work environment, where the aggressor takes advantage of his or her position or repeated involvement to impose such behavior
Sexual harassment in the workplace is a widespread problem and a serious issue not only because of moral and ethical violations but also because of legal repercussions involved. While the issue is serious and attention is being paid to curtail it, there still remain some ambiguities due to which it is not easy to determine what actually constitutes sexual harassment. For one, we must understand that sexual harassment is not
Sexual Harassment: How I Learned to Drive "Driving is easy. Just remember. Break pedal. Gas pedal. And go." Sara turned the key in the ignition and suddenly the car sprung to life. She couldn't believe it. Was she really driving? All of her life, while living in Saudi Arabia, driving meant sitting in the back seat, being taken somewhere by someone else. Learning to drive was a male rite of passage, like
Sexual harassment can be legally defined as "verbal or physical behavior of a sexual nature, aimed at a particular person or group of people, especially in the workplace or in academic or other institutional settings, that is actionable, as in tort or under equal-opportunity statutes" ("sexual harassment," 2012). If a person in authority such as a boss, mentor, or official is found pressurizing a person holding an inferior position with
Sexual Harassment It is important to note that apart from serving as a centre for economic gains, the workplace also serves as a second home as well as a critical social network. Just like any other social network, the workplace also tends to have a distinctive culture which in some cases could be a field of gender-biased traditional beliefs. It is these gender-biased traditional beliefs that at times expose individuals (typically
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now