Obviously, the difference in share attractiveness that resulted from this financial fact was clearly in favour of Google's eventual share growth. Basically, we can conclude that Google was at the right moment for an IPO and, additionally, the company was clearly much healthier and more prepared to have a significant subsequent share growth.

Bibliography

1. Reeves, Scott. IPO Outlook - Google's Flub, Flop and Bomb. Forbes.com. September 2004. On the Internet at http://www.forbes.com/home/strategies/2004/09/17/cx_sr_0917ipooutlook.html.Last retrieved on July 06, 2007

2. Befumo, R. (1997, May 15). Amazon.com Debuts. The Motley Fool. Retrieved August 25, 2006, at http://www.fool.com/Features/1997/sp970515aAmazonDebuts.htm

3. IPOGoogle.org. (n.d.) the Google Initial Public Offering: August...

Retrieved August 25, 2006, at http://www.ipogoogle.org/
4. Salkever, a. (2004, May 3). The How and Why of Google's Auction. Business Week Online. Retrieved August 25, 2006, from http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2004/tc2004053_9962_tc024.htm

5. Watson, J. (2001, February 19). The Discounters. Forbes Retrieved August 25, 2006, at http://www.forbes.com/2001/02/16/0219iporetail.html

Befumo, R. (1997, May 15). Amazon.com Debuts. The Motley Fool. Retrieved August 25, 2006, at http://www.fool.com/Features/1997/sp970515aAmazonDebuts.htm.Last retrieved on July 06, 2007

Reeves, Scott. IPO Outlook - Google's Flub, Flop and Bomb. Forbes.com. September 2004. On the Internet at http://www.forbes.com/home/strategies/2004/09/17/cx_sr_0917ipooutlook.html.Last retrieved on July 06, 2007