Verified Document

Intrpreting Existing State Law As Regards Same Essay

Intrpreting Existing State Law as Regards Same Sex Marriages Iowa, a state that is quickly recognized by most people as one of the most conservative states in the union, but which surprised 2008 election pundits, and perhaps even the candidates themselves when Iowa's voters sealed Barak Obama's bid for the Democratic party nomination and then supported him in the subsequent presidential; has reminded us that their support of Obama might have been a young voter turnout, 60's nostalgia, or any other number of factors, but that the state remains a conservative stronghold. In last week's elections, Iowa, according to an article in USA Today (Friday, November 5, 8A), Iowa voters voted out three incumbent state Supreme Court justice for lending a liberal interpretation to Iowa's marriage law (8A). The justices, three of the state's seven; voted concurrence with their other four colleagues -- who were not up for re-election -- to invalidate the state's law limiting marriage a man and a woman (8A). In other words, Iowa's law, up to the point that it was invalidated, prevented same-sex couples from wedding in that state.

Just as Iowa is important to national elections, the voter's have now made it equally important to the extreme left-wing liberal contingent that might seize the opportunity to make Iowa its battleground in the war against limiting marriage to same-sex couples. Indeed, lines of defense and position are being taken already as the articles cites "Local and national interest groups opposing same-sex marriage spent about $800,000 urging the judges' ouster (8A)." This, even...

None of the justice can be found as having expressed their personal views on same-sex marriage, but only as having interpreted Iowa's marriage law.
Clearly, as human beings with a JD, these judges have personal ideas and thoughts on the subject of same-sex marriage. The article goes on to say:

"Had the justices ruled against same-sex marriage and been targeted by groups favoring the practice, the principle would be the same. In neither case should judges be vilified. Instead, unhappy voters should seek a constitutional amendment (8A)."

When the judges ruled to invalidate Iowa marriage law, ostensibly because it did not accommodate same-sex couples; they were making a political statement in kind in favor of same-sex marriage -- it was more than an interpretation of the law. And under no circumstances would pro-gay marriage groups have remained silent had these judges not found in their favor. The judges interpreted a law that was clearly designed to address a union between a man and woman; and they could not have been unaware that invalidating the law that pertained to only men and woman as individuals seeking marriage would draw fire from Iowa's moral majority and anti-gay-marriage factions. The article expresses concern for these judges that the writer maintains was merely interpreting the law -- without personal political belief or personal belief about same-sex marriage -- and that can be argued as to be the first failing of the author of the article -- any interpretation of a law and its perceived or conceived application is never sans personal beliefs as relates to that law. Like any lawmaker, these judges were looking to provide access to same-sex couples to wed -- and their interpretation was influenced by their individual beliefs -- especially given that Iowa's marriage law -- like…

Sources used in this document:
References

Election Takeaways: From Iowa, a Chilling Message for Judges. USA Today, Friday,

November 5, 2010, p. 8A.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

US Presidential Elections
Words: 2409 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

Presidential Elections Because of the extreme conditions of the 1930s depression, the New Deal under Franklin Roosevelt went further in expanding the powers of the federal government than any previous administration in history, certainly far beyond the very limited role permitted to it by the conservative administrations of Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover in 1921-33. It was the worst depression in U.S. history, and led not only to

United States Presidential Election of 2006
Words: 1743 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

Appleman E.M. (2007). The Evolving Field. Online. Internet. Avail: http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2008/cands08txt.html. Info Acc: 27 October 2007 AFL-CIO (2007). Working Family Issues. Online. Internet. Avail: http://www.aflcio.org/issues/politics/issues.cfm.Info Acc: 27 October 2007 Bush, G.W. (2004) Victory Speech. Online. Internet. Avail: http://www.presidentialrhetoric.com/campaign/speeches/bush_nov3.html. Info Acc: 27 October 2007 Congress.org (2007) Election 2007: Candidates and Information. Online. Internet. Avail: http://www.congress.org/congressorg/e4/.Info Acc: 27 October 2007 Editorial. (2007) the Presidential Candidates on Iraq. The New York Times Oct 2007. The Green Papers (2006) 2006 Primary, Runoff and Midterm

2012 United States Presidential Election
Words: 2264 Length: 8 Document Type: Research Paper

Election The results of nearly every American presidential election in the past century have reverberated around the world. The same is true for this election, the 2012 presidential race between President Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, and a handful of under-represented third party candidates. This paper outlines some of the core issues that were on the table this election cycle. These are the main issues that the two candidates focused on, and

Presidential Election Campaign
Words: 2603 Length: 7 Document Type: Dissertation or Thesis complete

Presidential Campaign revolves under the presidential leadership from its formation. The presidential candidate has to undergo an electoral process so that they are declared winners. The nation has faced challenges like the world wars and even the civil wars due to differences in ideologies. The paper is going to cover U.S. political campaign of President Woodrow Wilson in 1916 as well as how this campaign differs from that of 1912? U.S.

Presidential Election Comparison of Candidates
Words: 3328 Length: 12 Document Type: Thesis

A primary is another system of electing delegates with a mandate to vote for a given candidate. Unlike caucuses, primaries are votes conducted by the government on behalf of the political party. This vote can be open, closed, semi-closed or semi-open. Open primaries allow citizens to vote in both parties' primaries; semi-closed only the primary for the party you belong to (independents may vote in these as well) and in

Election: The Coming Presidential Elections in the
Words: 1447 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Election: The coming presidential elections in the United States will be conducted on Tuesday, November 6, 2012 and will be America's 57th quadrennial presidential election. As the election approaches, various initiatives and measures have been taken to educate and empower America's voting public and create an increasingly responsible government. These efforts have primarily involved the provision of comprehensive, non-partisan information that relate to presidential candidates, news, issues, and political parties.

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now