Kaplan vs. Porter
The author of this report has been asked to compare and contrast two very popular models when it comes to strategic business decisions and the management involvement surrounding the same. One of those two approaches is the work of Kaplan and Norton while the other is that of Porter. Kaplan and Norton had a "notion," per the assignment parameters, of a strategic management system while Porter's work as come to be known as the Five Forces. The two frameworks are similar in some ways but they are also very different in other ways. This brief report shall compare and contrast the two approaches in several ways so as to reveal what makes them different and what makes them the same. While the two approaches being compared and contrasted in this report are different, they are both aligned toward the same overall goal and are centered on the same basic premise of strategic decision-making and business situational awareness.
Analysis
The centerpiece of the Kaplan and Norton approach has come to be known as the strategy map. It is basically a workflow diagram that is centered on strategic decision making. A strategy map using the Kaplan and Norton framework has four basic levels, those being the financial perspective, the customer perspective, the internal perspective and the learning/growth perspective. It was introduced to the business and scholarly world in 1992 via the Harvard Business Review publication. It was meant as a performance measurement system and a strategic management system. At its heart, the strategy map is a diagram that helps describe and delineate how an organization creates values by connecting the different strategic objectives that they have. To be more specific, there is a linkage of items that have a cause and effect relationship with each other and the underpinnings of the diagram is always going to be the balanced scorecard approach. This is where the four foci come from, actually. Indeed, strategy maps are an outgrowth and part of the overall balanced scorecard approach (VBM, 2013).
On the other hand, there is the Porter Five Forces model. The Kaplan model was based on the internal environment and the Porter model is based on the internal environment. Even with this major difference, they are similar in that the Porter model is also well-represented by a diagram. Most commonly, the diagram is manifested by a circle or other shape in the center that represents competitive rivalry. Exterior to that but all influencing rivalry would be the threat of new entry, buyer power, threat of substitution and supplier…
For Apple, this strategy has translated into market dominance in the smartphone and tablet PC markets. The success of that company continues to underscore the inherent value in synchronizing these three elements of an HRM framework, transformational leadership, and a continual supply of disruptive innovation for heavy investment in R&D. The Practicality of Agile HRM Frameworks and Their Impact on Long-Term Financial Viability The creation of an effective HRM framework, continual
Q.1 Change agents, internal external, upheaval organization's employees. Compare contrast advantages internal vs. external interventionists. Q.2 When organizational reengineering organizational transformation approaches change management? Give instances, elaborate. Change agents, whether internal or external, will always cause an upheaval among an organization's employees. Compare and contrast the advantages of internal vs. external interventionists. Internal proponents of change have the advantage of knowing the organization's standard operating procedures. They can tailor their recommendations in
Aviation Management is a complex issue in any environment. In the 21st century environment Aviation Management faces many challenges. These challenges are related to Globalization, Challenges specific to legacy airlines, Air Traffic control shortages and Ethics including the impact of greenhouse gas emmissions. The purpose of this discussion is to examine the Challenges of the 21st century in Aviation Management and the forces of change. Globalization Challenges for Legacy airlines Like any industry,
Other physical differences in the genders affect their preferences and are seen from infancy as well. During infancy, males have superior visual acuity. In contrast, female infants demonstrate better auditory discrimination and localization. This leads to males have a greater interest in visual patterning and auditory sequencing for females. Even in adulthood, Kriegman (1999) cites Hutt, visual reinforcers are more effective in male conditioning while females find auditory stimuli more
This level of the maturity model is a transitory one and is focused more on either small, incremental gains from the first level, which is Reacting. In the Reacting layer of this proposed Branding Maturity Model, the majority of brand departments have a decidedly "every department for itself" approach to process maturity and have information flow that is purely dependent on personal productivity applications only. That is to say
Strategic Advantage Introduction and Description of the Problem Tesco is the market leader in the UK supermarket industry, with a share of 28.8% as of the summer 2014 (Statista 2014). Other major firms in the industry are Asda, Sainsburys and Morrisons, but the industry overall is highly fragmented. Most firms in the industry compete in the mainstream segment of the market, including Tesco. Few major players operate with a premium platform. The
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now