Article Review
A part of learning history is understanding who is making what argument or claim about a subject. What is the strength of the argument and how does the author support the argument with evidence.
In the article review, you will identify the thesis or primary argument made by the author. You will identify the main arguments stated in the first or second paragraph and found in the body of the article with evidence.
Thesis: America has always been conflicted between whether it should go with leaders or managers, professionals or amateurs, genius or intellect. Yet for the most part in antebellum America, the idea that military genius was better than military intellect (i.e., military education) prevailed. Ultimately, when the Civil War began in 1861, the debate about who should lead included factors of genius, intellect, and character.
Main Arguments by Author:
The North turned to genius (Scott), then to intellect (McClellan) and finally to character (Grant) for leadership in the war.
However, losses mounted, and the erosion of public confidence in Stone, Scott, and especially McClellan spawned a distrust of professional soldiers as a class and restored the popular faith in innate military genius.[footnoteRef:1] [1: Reardon, Carol.With a sword in one hand and Jomini in the other: The problem of military thought in the Civil War north (Univ of North Carolina Press, 2012) 65.]
Grant represented something new in military leadership for America: From the start, however, Grant seemed difficult to categorize.[footnoteRef:2] However, it was clear from his victories that he had the necessary coolness and demeanor of character to succeed in the heat of battle.[footnoteRef:3] [2: Reardon, Carol.With a sword in one hand and Jomini...
…charge and charge and hold the line in the face of danger, and that turned out to be Grant. He was something much differenta real warrior on the battlefield, not just on paper or in the imagination. This article makes that abundantly clear and clears up a lot of myths about the war. The authors overall aim might have been made a little clearer, however, because it did not really start out with a statement of purpose or an indication of what the main point of the essay would be. Overall, however, I would definitely recommend this article for anyone interested in the Civil War, as it does a good job of discussing the finer points of the issues. The evidence is sufficiently provided with lots of references to primary and secondary sources.Bibliography
Reardon, Carol.With a sword in one hand…
Bibliography
Reardon, Carol. With a sword in one hand and Jomini in the other: The problem of military thought in the Civil War north. Univ of North Carolina Press, 2012.
Reardon, Carol. "William T. Sherman in Postwar Georgia’s Collective Memory, 1864–1914." Wars within a War: Controversy and Conflict over the American Civil War (2009): 223-248.
Reardon, Carol. Soldiers and Scholars: The US Army and the Uses of Military History, 1865-1920. University Press of Kansas, 1990.
American Civil War transformed the country's policies and culture, and its wide-ranging ramifications are still being felt to this day, offering an ideal case study in the multi-faceted phenomenon of war. Although the ostensible reasons for the war are generally clear to anyone with a grade school education in American history, assigning the outbreak of the war to any one factor unnecessarily disguises the myriad political, economic, and social forces
Civil War Between 1861 and 1865, the United States was engaged in a Civil War between the states in the North, and the Southern states who seceded from the Union to form the Confederacy. The war, also known as the War between the States, the War of the Rebellion, the War of Secession, and the War for Southern Independence, is widely believed to have been fought due to differences in the
In fact McClellan insists that notwithstanding all of Grant's capabilities and resources, Grant was not able to maneuver successfully against Lee until "Lee's field transportation gave out" (Hagerman, 66). Hagerman makes many assertions about the Civil War's generals that a reader of his book cannot immediately verify, but must take at face value. Deep in his book, for example, Hagerman claims that General Lee's cavalry battle at Yellow Tavern (May,
It was indeed a time of severe misery for the black community that was deprived of all its rights-even the most basic ones. These were the conditions in the South. In North, things looked different. Slavery was not rampant and progressive nature of this part had led to better treatment of minorities. North was essentially industrialized and blacks were employed in factories instead of plantations. This was a better
Civil Death Death and the American Civil War: Disruptions of Decency and a New Awareness of Reality Victorian notions of the body and its functions were complex given the combination of the rise in biological and medical knowledge that occurred during the nineteenth century and the prudery that gained such traction during the same era. These two trajectories were likely not in simple conflict as they might appear, but rather the increasing
In many ways, the how of the evolution of the Civil War is a pseudo-chicken-and-egg question; which issue supported the other? Did the slave labor of the South spawn the abolition rampant throughout Union ideology or did the economics of one-sided success and agricultural threat pose a fundamental insecurity system? New Jersey highlighted the road in between. "Let the south be protected in all her rights but let the
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now