Verified Document

Innocence Project On October 21, Reaction Paper

This is a risk in any cross-racial identification, where someone may notice differences from their own ethnic group, but fail to look beyond those features that stand out as "other" in his mind, which makes any person in that racial group a possible suspect. In fact, it is impossible to overplay the role that misidentification has played in so many wrongful convictions. It is difficult for many people to realize that DNA evidence did not play a role in older convictions; the technology simply was not available. Furthermore, when DNA evidence first became available, it was a new technology that was not fully understood by all of the actors in the criminal justice system. In those early times, there were investigators, prosecutors, and fact finders who would believe a credible witness over scientific evidence. Something like this appears to have occurred in James' case. There was a scientific test available that excluded him as a possible suspect, but it was ignored. Furthermore, one must assume either incompetence on the part of James' defense attorney of a failure by the state to provide all exculpatory evidence to the defense, because the jury did not hear that testimony.

It seems like police officers, in addition to victims, are prone to get fixated on a certain perpetrator and just focus on that evidence that would convict that person of the crime, without looking at the totality of the evidence. This was observed by Thomas Golden, a partner at the law firm who represented James. According to Golden, misidentification played a role in 75% of cases that later result in exoneration because of DNA evidence (Innocence Project, 2011). It is possible for the police to influence a victim's perception of potential suspects, so any initial identification, such as lineups, must contain precautions that eliminate the possibility of that type of influence.

An additional factor that makes this case seem so unusual is the fact that this witness knew James prior to being raped. James had helped the...

In addition, when the husband got in a car wreck, James went to the victims' home to inform her that he had been in a wreck and had been arrested. It was after that time that another person entered the home and raped the victim. The fact that the victim knew James' was not explored by the police or really during his trial. That would have been critical information, because she did not immediately identify her assailant, but picked him out in a later identification, only after the police identified him as a suspect. All of this information would have been very helpful to a jury trying to determine the accuracy of the victim's identification of James as her assailant.
Another thing that stands out from reading about James' exoneration is the fact that it may not have happened. The evidence from James' conviction had been misplaced, which is not surprising given that almost three decades had elapsed between the crime and James' release. The evidence was uncovered by chance, when Dureau was looking for evidence in a different case and found the slide from James' case. He happened to recall that he had previously been looking for evidence in James' case. Had Dureau not run across the slide, had he failed to remember it had been the subject of an earlier search, or had he failed to pull the evidence since he was not working on that case at the time, then James would probably have spent the rest of his life in prison, there for a crime that he had not committed. The random nature of his exoneration makes one really wonder how many people who are in prison are there for crimes that they did not commit.

References

Innocence Project. (2011, October 21). New Orleans man wrongfully incarcerated for 30 years exonerated of rape that new DNA evidence proves he didn't commit. Retrieved from http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/New_Orleans_Man_Wrongly_Incarcerated_for_30_Years_Exonerated_of_Rape_that_New_DNA_Evidence_Proves_He_Didnt_Commit.php

Sources used in this document:
References

Innocence Project. (2011, October 21). New Orleans man wrongfully incarcerated for 30 years exonerated of rape that new DNA evidence proves he didn't commit. Retrieved from http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/New_Orleans_Man_Wrongly_Incarcerated_for_30_Years_Exonerated_of_Rape_that_New_DNA_Evidence_Proves_He_Didnt_Commit.php
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Innocents Project Exoneration
Words: 1661 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

Corrections/Police - Criminal Justice Innocents Project Exoneration On November 19, 1991, 14-year-old Cateresa Matthews left her great-grandmother's house in Dixmoor, Illinois. She was not seen again until December 8, 1991, when her body was found on a well-worn path running along I-57 as it passes through Dixmoor. "She had been shot in the mouth at close range with a .25 caliber pistol. She was also an apparent victim of sexual assault, as

Wrongful Conviction Review: Henry James Wrongful Convictions
Words: 3867 Length: 10 Document Type: Case Study

Wrongful Conviction Review: Henry James Wrongful convictions are convictions where "factually innocent people are convicted of crimes" (Acker & Redlich, 2011, p.3). There are a number of ways that wrongful convictions can occur. Two of these ways are no crime convictions and wrong man convictions (Acker & Reclich, 2011, p.7-8). No crime convictions occur when someone is convicted of a crime, generally murder, and then it is later discovered that no

Wrongful Conviction of James Henry James Was
Words: 3767 Length: 12 Document Type: Essay

Wrongful Conviction of James Henry Henry James was only 19 years during his conviction for rape that he did not commit. It is after thirty years imprisonment that the realization of his innocence emerges thereby keeping it free. This case is a good example of the importance of evidence in the proceedings of a case. The imprisonment of the innocent man arose because of the little evidence that he had against

DNA Technology and How It Has Impacted
Words: 3810 Length: 15 Document Type: Term Paper

DNA technology and how it has impacted the American criminal justice system. The research was conducted utilizing secondary resources, such as testimonies from DNA experts and published resources. It was discovered that, despite challenges faced by the technology, DNA has positively affected the criminal justice system by allowing for the successful capture and prosecution of criminals, as well as exonerating those who were wrongly imprisoned. PREFACE STATEMENT Overview of DNA DNA as

Racial Discrimination and the Death Penalty the
Words: 8134 Length: 25 Document Type: Term Paper

Racial Discrimination and the Death Penalty The United States Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics reported that at the end of the year 2000 that there was 1,381,892 total number of prisoners under the jurisdiction of federal or state adult correctional authorities (State pp). During 2000, the prison population rose at the lowest rate since 1972 and had the smallest absolute increase since 1980 (State pp). Relative to the number

Central Park Five
Words: 2732 Length: 10 Document Type: Essay

Central Park Five Abstract  The Central Park jogger case, often referred to as the Central Park Five for the five men who were wrongly convicted of the assault, is a brutal assault that occurred in Central Park in 1989.  The victim was severely assaulted, which resulted in her losing her memory surrounding the attack.  The police identified at least 14 suspects, and a number of them were convicted of the assault, despite

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now