Katz introduces in his book, The Silent World of Doctor and Patient the origins of informed consent. "The birth date of informed consent was 22 October 1957" (Katz, 1984, p. 60). In those origins he shares that although informed consent and disclosure were introduced as standard, people have always had problems communicating with each other and therefore it leads to a disconnect when disclosure and consent are applied to medical procedure. Simply put, for the longest time, the physician-patient relationship has always included a certain level of silence. This was meant to keep patients from being too alarmed to go on with the treatment or procedure and to avoid any unsavory discussions. But when cases like Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. showed the court and the public the perils of not including informed consent, things began to change, albeit slowly, which only confirms that informed consent and disclosure were never a part of medical thinking and practice. What was deemed a part of medical thinking and practice was faith in the physician's ability to do his or her job. Katz discusses this in his book and shows that while patients welcomed the inclusion of informed consent and disclosure, they felt they were being lied to because of the continued silence that has always existed in this kind of relationship. Katz suggests that patients justly so, feel cheated by "the duplicities, evasions, and lies that have infiltrated conversations...
45). Implying the "ritual" of disclosure is more so a formality than an actual act of compliance and patients can discern the genuine attempts from the ingenuous ones. Going back to the trust established in the physician-patient relationship, blind faith, based on empirical evidence, does not suggest it aids against the struggle of disease. In fact, obedience and compliance are not gained through blind faith, but rather being informed. "Obedience, compliance, and trust are, in the appropriate settings, virtues not vices" (Caplan, 1987, p. 46).Competence refers to the practitioner's accurate self-representation of credentials as well as contributing to the profession by undergoing ongoing professional development throughout the career. Although competence is a distinct value from integrity, it is also related to integrity because all social workers should have the personal and professional integrity to practice only within their realm of professional training and competence, and also to upgrade their skills according to emerging research,
Patient Rights and Informed Consent The relevant legal issues at stake in this case are those related to the question of whether Mr. Jones is indeed incompetent and if Mr. Jones is indeed incompetent then what is the authority that should be assigned to the surrogate daughter of the patient in this case. The hospital physician and staff must avoid legal liability and ensure that they are in adherence to
C). AAPC Code of Ethics is shorter compared to ACA's, centering more on specific issues such as confidentiality and professional practices, among others. Identified as Principle IV in the AAPC code of ethics, Confidentiality is synonymously identified as 'respect for the integrity and protection of the welfare' of its clients, a claim that is similar to ACA's stance on confidentiality. ACA and AAPC discussed the issue of confidentiality similarly, although AAPC
Consent How much information is sufficient for informed consent to be effective and legal? Informed consent is considered an ethical obligation on the part of physicians and is also a legal requirement in all 50 states. Informed consent means that the physician has discussed the patient's diagnosis; the purpose, risks, and benefits of any treatment or procedure he or she is performing on the patient; alternative treatments and their risks and
Confidentiality Breaches in Clinical Practice The confidentiality and privacy of patients are considered as one of the fundamental freedoms that they should enjoy and are safeguarded under Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPPA). It is also a precept of the American Medical Association’s Code of Ethics and the Hippocratic Oath. The breach of confidentiality is unethical and illegal. Medical professionals are under the obligation of protecting the patient’s confidentiality.
Consent Process Following a number of high-profile abuses of patients in experiments during the early 20th century, the need for an informed consent process became apparent. To determine the current state of affairs with this process, this paper reviews the relevant literature to explain the key issues and concerns for obtaining informed consent from study subjects and how this process reflects the code of conduct set forth in Section 4.8
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now