¶ … Rehabilitation for Juvenile Offenders
Discipline, punishment and prisons are in many ways as old as the history of humanity. Nearly every society has had some form of confinement or some method of punishing those who break the laws of society. The modern world, however, has experimented heavily with the concept and notion of discipline and punishment, along with the programs and methodologies inherent within these two things. However, the issue in its entirety becomes far more complex with juvenile offenders, as punishments for them can range from halfway house facilities to minimum security work camps to high security detention centers. With juvenile offenders in particular, there has been an aggravated struggle to make punishments more effective. For juvenile offenders, methods of punishment really need to reflect the social standards of the societies from which they originate. In this case, for juvenile offenders the absolute objective has to always be an attempt at rehabilitation. Just as research demonstrates that for adult-offenders rehabilitation is key in minimizing recidivism rates, for juvenile offenders the need for rehabilitation is even greater.
If imprisonment for juvenile offenders can manifest in a range of ways from detention halls to actual prison-like facilities; however neither of these arenas are permanent. Thus for juvenile offenders, most of them will actually be released back into society, making rehabilitation an absolute necessity. "Imprisonment shows society's abhorrence for certain antisocial behaviors and incarceration removes individuals from the community for a period of time. Most offenders however, are eventually released from prison. Thus, another goal of incarceration is that imprisonment will serve to deter offenders from engaging in further criminal behavior" (Bonta, 1999). When it comes to adult offenders, one can see the dangerous and ineffective pattern that society is leaning towards: longer sentences as a means of deterring people from crime. However, there's an intense moral and financial cost to society when longer sentences become the norm, regardless of whether the sentences occur in prisons or juvenile detention halls. Detention or imprisonment does not have an effective rate a reducing recidivism: thus using these forms of punishment as a means of deterring criminal behavior really has no empirical support (Bonta, 1999). Such a finding should not be underestimated. Juvenile offenders are either going to go along one of two paths: they're either going to straighten up and become contributing members of society, or they're going to engage in crimes that are even worse as adult offenders. Given how expensive juvenile detention centers actually are, there needs to be a more effective use of the collective money of society so that juvenile detention centers aren't merely places for young offenders to hang out, before they are released into society, commit more crimes as they get older and then become wards of the prison system. When it comes to the adequate treatment of young offenders, one only needs to look to the adult prison system for guidance on what to do. This prison system has demonstrated that when it comes to adults, rehabilitation is the way to go. Offender treatment programs have proven to be more useful in minimizing criminal behavior, rather than bolstering the length and severity of punishments for criminal acts (Bonta, 1999). Thus, if rehabilitation is effective at minimizing recidivism rates for adult offenders, then this is probably especially true for juvenile offenders, as young offenders are still in development and are more malleable.
When the juvenile system focuses more strongly on rehabilitation it becomes a win-win situation for nearly everyone in society. A stronger focus on rehabilitation means that time spent incarcerated can be minimized and the needs of delinquents can also be better addressed, and an opportunity to become more productive members of society scan also occur. Furthermore, society doesn't have to incur the costs connected with incarcerating young offenders. When punishments is focused on it can generally cause "… more repeat offenders, and ultimately, depriving both society and the offenders themselves of their full potential" (The League of Young Voters, 2009). This is because when it comes to juvenile offenders; it's often the case that the criminal acts are merely symptoms of a larger emotional or psychological problem. Punishment just addresses the symptom, but not the larger problem, thus creating a situation where the youth is likely to reoffend.
On the other hand, rehabilitation creates a situation where offenders can better understand their behavior and where it originates. With the absence of rehabilitation, it puts the youth in a situation where they are more than likely...
Relevance Juvenile offenders and reoffenders are an important problem facing the United States criminal justice system. For more than one hundred years, states held the belief that the juvenile justice system acted as a vehicle to safeguard the public via offering a structure that enables the rehabilitation of children growing into adulthood. States identified the difference of children committing crimes versus adult offenders (Loeber & Farrington, 2012). For example, the states
Juvenile offenders have grown to become a serious problem in many countries, especially the United States. Like adult offenders, juvenile offenders are more likely to reoffend, especially without the proper guidance and assistance they need in order to live a law abiding life. Research within the last five years has led to identification of specific program models as well theory-based intervention approaches that not only assist juvenile offenders in leading
Juvenile Offenders, an Intervention Analysis The challenge of juvenile offenders, what prompts them into crime and what factors contribute to the repeat of same misdemeanors that led them to the juvenile prison are issues that have for long attracted protracted discussions and even detailed researches. There has been little attention however given to the possible role of mentor programs in keeping the young people off crime. This research proposal hence looks
Dugan: Should be on its own page. Juvenile recidivism is a prevalent problem in the criminal justice system. Tackling reoffending remains a complex task requiring several strategies and aims. It involves research, acknowledgement of causes, factors, exploration, and evaluation of subgroups to generate long-term, positive changes in the lives of juvenile offenders. From gang violence to Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive (ICAP), researchers discover some of the reasons why juveniles
When a lawyer who has never been disciplined represents a juvenile, chances of accepting a plea are high. This is because the lawyer is likely to negotiate for a lesser sentence (Grigorenko, 2012). The current juvenile court system allows youth offenders to be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. This is like declaring these youths as people who are irredeemable. Evidently, youths have the capability to change. Moreover, a system
Though these factors can be an influence on the juvenile's choice to commit a crime, the ultimate cause of the crime was the juvenile's own cost-benefit analysis, according to this model. A practical exploration of this model can be done using Jacob Ind, one of the five Colorado teenagers sentenced to life in prison without parole in Frontline's documentary, "Kids Who Get Life" (Bikel 2007). Ind was convicted of killing
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now