"
Where once monopolists exported goods to other countries to make a profit, now they export finance capital. This is another symptom of the imperialistic stage of capitalism -- what to do with excess wealth? Lenin states that it would not be capitalism if the excess wealth were used to improve the quality of life for the millions of people who are still underfed and leading lives of misery. Instead, the capital is exported to "backward" countries and used to make more profits. In backward countries (now called developing nations) where there is a shortage of capital, labor is cheap, raw materials are cheap, and the price of land is low -- ideal conditions for making a profit. Investment in foreign countries brings big returns. For one thing, it accelerates the development of capitalism in those countries, and it allows the countries that are exporting capital to obtain certain advantages. For example, the investor may get "a coaling station, a contract to construct a harbour, a fat concession, or an order for guns" (p. 65). An industry that loans money to a poor country profits first from the loan itself; then, it pockets other profits from the same loan when the borrower uses the loan to buy goods from the lender (for example, to purchase railway materials from the Steel Syndicate). Instead of competition for the market, "connections" are used to make these profitable transactions: "The most usual thing is to stipulate that part of the loan that is granted shall be spent on purchases in the country of issue, particularly on orders for war materials, or for ships, etc." (p. 66).
With this development of exporting capital, the result has been gigantic international cartels, trusts, and syndicates, or monopolist capatalist combines, as Lenin calls them. Together the combine divides up the world into spheres of influence, sets prices, and shares the profits with each other, thus creating world-wide "super-monopolies."
Lenin cites the example of the electric industry at the turn of the last century. In Europe A.E.G., which consisted of seven or eight companies, each formed by combining several companies, by 1912 had become just one big combine controlling countless companies. In the United States General Electric came out on top. The result was there were only two electric companies in the world, A.E.G. And General Electric, and no other electric company anywhere could be completely independent of them. These two made an agreement to divide the world between them, and competition ended. This has happened in many industries -- oil, mercantile shipping, railroads, and steel being some examples Lenin gives. He then explains: "The capitalists divide the world, not out of any particular malice, but because the degree of concentration which has been reached forces them to adopt this method in order to get profits" (p. 75). Capitalists then form alliances based on the economic division of the world, while parallel alliances are formed between governments in their struggles for colonies and for economic territories.
Aggressive colonization and territorial division of the world began precisely when the "old capitalism" or free competition ended and monopolies emerged. Thus, Lenin sees the development of exporting capital as inextricably linked to colonization.
Before free competition ended, the prevailing thought was that colonies would be liberated, that their separation from Britain, for example, was "inevitable and desirable" (p. 78). The colonies were regarded as burdensome. But by the turn of the century, opinion had shifted and imperialism (or acquiring new lands) was seen as a way to solve social (such as hunger and homelessness) problems. Colonial possessions (and the wealth they generated) increased enormously. Colonialism did exist before capitalism, but it was different (p. 82). With modern colonialism, monopolist combines dominate, and all sources of raw materials are under their control. The cartels make it impossible for others to compete with them. Colonial possession gives them a clear field in the subjugated country. Lenin points out: "The more capitalism is developed, the more the need for raw materials is felt, the more bitter competition becomes, and the more feverishly the hunt for raw materials proceeds throughout the whole world, the more desperate becomes the struggle for the acquisition of colonies" (p. 82). Colonial exploitation is imperialism, the final stage of capitalism.
To sum up, capitalism starts out as free competition, but through growth, cartels, and concentration of production, turns into monopoly, which is the opposite of free competition. Imperialism inevitably occurs during...
Imperialism which is often considered to be a final stage of capitalism was a logical continuation of industrialization, development of trade and colonization. Global trade and goods exchange have united Europe, Africa, America and Asia into an integral organism. Imperial system as well as interaction between the major colonial super-powers guaranteed economical stability and peace. Colonies were perfect markets for the goods produced in metropolises and were used as emergency
For instance, the United States aided in the installation of Fidel Castro in Cuba, and then initiated a trade embargo against him when his policies did not meet their expectations. Ronald Reagan's involvement in the Iran-Contra affair suggested United States imperial action in both Latin America and the Middle East. Furthermore, while the United States' intervention in Latin America after the 1800s has been primarily motivated by a desire
He stated that France as a financial capital was richer than Germany and Japan combined. The rest of the section sees a return to the monopolies and their control over raw materials. Stating how the international monopolies controlled all the material necessary to manufacture and produce goods. He asserts that the monopolies created shortages in areas to keep the public from turning against colonization of other areas when in fact
imperialism is necessary for cultures to progress. The United States is not often thought of as an imperialistic nation, because we like to think that we would not subjugate or take over other countries. However, that is just what we did when our forefathers came to this country and shoved aside the Native Americans. We subjugated and eradicated a culture and way of life, and that is the textbook
globalization and imperialism and argues that globalization is actually nothing more than imperialism under a new guise. The writer uses several sources to illustrate the definition of imperialism and then holds it against globalization to prove they are one and the same under different names. There were nine sources used to complete this paper. Globalization = U.S. Imperialism As mankind continues with the process of globalization, many world leaders point to
In the 20th century, both of these tactics were utilized to successfully gain independence for a number of countries. (Conrad 83 -- 149) (Hochschild 101 -- 164) (Gainty) However, Africans also helped European efforts. This was accomplished by many individuals becoming actively involved in: the political, economic and military structure. Over the course of time, these activities divided entire nations against one another. Once this took place, is when the
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now