The hackers, obviously to blame for the crime, played on the flaws of a computer system that should not have allowed for a security breach. While the same hackers were responsible for the fall of a non-profit online service provider named Arbornet only months before, they were unaware of the increasing watchful eye of the Lowe's corporation on their actions. While Lowe's was not yet able to smooth the seams of its system and the holes allowing access, they were able to keep watch, something that all corporations need to take responsibility and do. From the corporate data center in North Carolina, Lowe's employees were able to trace the breaches in the system and, instead of attempting to shut it down themselves, called for help - from the Charlotte FBI. Working together, they were able to make use of the careful observance of the systems to capture and indict the two young hackers.
The same crimes that play out on a corporate level befall single individuals on a regular basis, most of whom do not have the computer savvy to watch and prevent security breaches of information on their computers or wearily know what information to give whom online. This sense of mistrust is particularly true lately, when the old adage of not giving information to strangers was disregarded for only giving information to seemingly-legitimate companies online, like the Gap or one's own bank; yet, this new adage seems to give way in light of the recent weeks, when those most trusted with personal information have let it go. While poor company choices, insecure technology, poor interfaces, and extremely knowledgeable hackers are to blame for much fraud, the role of the consume as an ignorant agent has to also be addressed and faulted.
It is this issue - the ignorant consumer - that the government is theoretically required to protect. Because the basis of the American government is to protect the citizens from harm that might befall them in ways amenable to public interest, the government must take responsibility to help consumers first understand their levels of ignorance, a social charge not easily mastered by the pride Americans characteristically exhibit, but also make knowledge readily available, at their disposal, and easily understood. At the same time, the role of mandatory Internet security measures to be implemented service providers and built-in fees meant to cover (nearly insure) computers to cover incidence of theft are suggested as public solutions.
As solutions abound on the scene, their viability comes strictly into question. Built in fees attached to a computer upon purchase in order to insure it from theft is encouraged by many, but fails to hold up under the microscope - from what could a built-in fee protect? How could it be applied? If a fraud is committed, the consumer will still have to take the time, money, and legal action to remedy the personal effects, although the idea offers the bonus of encouraging consumer trust. Regardless of its viability, the concept of insurance is one that insights feelings of security in the American public and is worth entertaining. Stiffer fines are also widely discussed, frequently by legislators who wish to implement a fearsome system of penalties, including jail time, for those who commit the fraud. California, in 2003, became the first state to require companies to publicly announce security breaches, an alternate form of prevention that, while dispersing knowledge to the public, also incites more market fear about online fiscal transactions.
Mandatory ISP coverage is among the most feasible nascent solutions to the problem of identity fraud. Already embraced by start-ups like NetZero who appeal to the renegades from AOL and cable- and phone company- based services, desiring lower fees and higher protection, the coverage requires mandatory filtering of information on behalf of the ISP, tracking how, when, and where information goes when leaving the personal computer to which it provides internet access and where it goes. The system, in early and proposed stages, marries well with journalists, who acknowledge the public relations strength of the concept, as well as the ultimate security that it may provide.
The use of privacy software by the ISPs would establish an early wall of protection and an immediate source of blame; for example, in the case of the Lowe's security breach, while hackers were at fault for committing the actions, the wireless networking system that made the whole so gaping a twenty-year-old in a Grand Prix could step through it suggests a critical lack of responsibility on behalf of the service...
Identity Theft: Managing the Risk Management What's New for the Future of Identity Theft Prevention In this paper I examine the basics of identity theft in today's age of widespread and accessible information. The fundamental problem is that while information technologies continue to make aspects of our lives as simple as "point and click," they tend to make certain forms of crime equally simple. The internet, in particular, makes information not only
Identity Theft Corp (ITC) is a new company specializing on the identity theft service. The company assists customers to monitor their credit report in order to identify any suspicious charge. The company will also provide the leg work to clean up the mess left behind because of the identity theft and assist customers to rebuild their credits. The objective of this proposal is to provide strategic planning and implementation for Identity
Identity Theft III Identity Theft Clean-Up and Credit Monitoring Product Solutions for the United States Market Product Description Proactive Solutions Reactive Solutions Target Market Market Analysis Potential Market Growth In previous reports various aspects of a new market expansion for a credit monitoring and other related services would be introduction crossed borders from the corporate headquarters in Canada into the United States. The move into the United States marketplace represents a new market expansion that represents an incredible
Once your personal or financial information has been compromised, it may take months and even years to secure them again. This may involve filing fraud case with your bank, information everyone about your stolen SSN and generally avoiding credit cards or debit card transactions. This is indeed a major problem getting one's identity and peace of mind back once it has been compromised. For this reason prevention is the
Wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_theft. Hoar, Sean B. Identity Theft: The Crime of the New Millennium (2001). U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved March 20, 2007 at http://www.cybercrime.gov/usamarch2001_3.htm. Has some clown taken over your good name? (2004). The Police Notebook. University of Oklahoma Police Department. Retrieved March 20, 2007 at http://www.ou.edu/oupd/idtheft.htm. Thorne, J. And Segal, a. (2006). Identity theft: The new way to rob a bank. CNN online. Retrieved March 20, 2007 at http://www.cnn.com/2006/U.S./05/18/identity.theft/index.html. New technology may increase identity
Spyware runs automatically without the user's knowledge and transmits vital information. Spyware can also record your keystrokes and one might end up revealing all usernames, passwords and other details to identity thieves. (Atlantic Publishing, 2008); (Schwabach, 2005) Identity thieves have also found novel ways to steal and use identities. For instance, cyber criminals recently hacked Facebook, a popular social networking site, and changed a user's page asking people to help
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now