Identity Is This Explanation Sufficient,

Identity

Is this explanation sufficient, or do you see other factors (e.g., global, economic, relational, etc.) at work in the way we understand identity?

Identity is, as Luhrmann suggests, dynamic. Identity changes dramatically over time, but the speed and intensity of those changes depend on personality, cultural, and historical factors. Global, economic, relational, and other factors contribute to how an individual's identity is constructed and communicated. Identity is conceptualized differently in academia, too. The intense scrutiny of identity in academia, fueled by postmodern discourse, can account for why we understand identity differently now than several decades ago.

Part of the reason for the shift in scholastic discourse about identity is the global factors that shape identity. Globalization and the integration of cultures on a level previously impossible in the history of the planet has led to a radical shift in the way we value certain traits that comprise identity. Respect for diversity has also enhanced the way we think about identity. Aspects of identity that might have been denied or denigrated because of colonial mentalities can resurface and be admired. Discourse on gender and social class has also deepened and enabled identity constructions to flourish outside the confines of proscribed gender roles. Culture changes, and so too does identity. The values placed on identity aspects like religion have shifted too, making religion a less salient part of people's identity. On the other hand, sexual orientation and gender identity have both become more important. Gender roles have changed to such a great degree as to transform the definition and meaning of family, love, or sex.