Educational philosophy that I would most support more than anything would be one which supports the benefit of learning by doing. I believe wholeheartedly in the power of experience being the best teacher. I realize that this might mean that my students or any students might fail repeatedly before they succeed at something, but I've always believed that failure is an excellent teacher. Furthermore, learning by doing might cause students to struggle more, in grasping concepts and in trying to understand ideas, but I still believe that struggle is one of the more beneficial and instructive lessons, and that it can teach lasting and memorable lessons.
However, this will mean at times that one will have to provide students with a certain level of introduction so that they have the backbone and scaffolding to make discoveries and to learn the most meaningful lessons possible. As Locke illuminates, one of the major flaws with the way that students are taught is that children are overwhelmed with rules and precepts (many of which are not understood well, and they are easily forgotten (Goodyear, 2013). This observation of Locke zeroes in on several factors which are at stake in many classrooms: students are overburdened with rules and guidelines and most rules, guidelines and messages are seldom conveyed in a meaningful way, so they are often forgotten quickly.
Thus, within my educational philosophy, there would be a premium placed on being able to teach children in a lasting and meaningful way that the children would find challenging and stimulating, but which would also be memorable for the students so that these important lessons weren't just quickly forgotten. In this manner, Locke would encourage the following way of proceeding: "(1) make sure the child understands and can carry out the task you set for them; (2) have them repeat the task over and over until the performance of the task no longer depends on memory or reflection. Now this latter step is crucial for the development of a good character. For it is when a child is young that one can implant all the good habits necessary for further development. Locke writes in section 64: 'Having this way cured your child of any fault, it is cured forever: and thus, one by one, you may weed them out all, and plant what habits you please'. But the key is that these rules are not to be imposed as duties or difficulties; rather, whatever rules you want a child to follow must be implanted by indispensable practice which will lead to natural habits functioning beyond conscious memory" (Goodyear, 2013). This will allow for not only expedited learning but the development of strong character habits which will no doubt be connected with repetition and the development of strong habits. This will give all students a strong foundation upon which to engage in the practice of learning through experience and learning through exploration, along with trial and error. With this educational philosophy, students will be able to forge meaningful lessons and a sense of bravery when it comes to exploring things that they haven't tried before.
Students won't be too easily discouraged by challenging problems or other such educational obstacles because they will have developed a certain level of integrity when it comes to their studies and among the entire learning process. In this manner, technology has sort of done children a minor disservice in that it has made things too easy and too facile for students: it has taken out some of the more difficult trials within the learning process and allowed the technology to handle them, without the student being forced to engage in certain computations and other such processes. At the same time, by making so many of the common speed bumps of the learning process to simple, it forces students to be elevated further and further, so that they are sooner dealing with more sophisticated problems and computations.
Another important aspect of this educational philosophy is that it would focus on the fact that all children are curious and seek to capitalize on this innate curiosity for the benefit of their education; this is something that Locke discusses at length. A good educational philosophy when employed will be able to seize this innate curiosity that children have and be able to aptly channel it into knowledge (Goodyear, 2013). This can best be done, according to Locke, by providing children with answers that are true, clear, understandable and located firmly within the child's realm of experience, without ever lying to the student. Instead,...
Mathematics has its own internal logic and creates and obeys its own 'rules,' just as a beautiful picture obeys the rules of proportion (or deliberately violate but acknowledges the rules of form as seen in the artwork of Picasso). Great art or important science holds true to the logical rules of a discipline. What is good in art and science holds true to valid principles of a correspondence to
In many learning situations, however, there is no ultimate truth upon which the teacher can call to instruct her students. Instead, many topics are still controversial, even as they are a part of history. In this case, teachers must acknowledge this fact as true, leading to a valuable lesson for students who may assume that textbooks and authority figures are always right. In some cases, however, the teacher must
Here the emphasis is on complete neutrality, the child being exposed to all different ways of thinking and believing (Cahn, p. 421). In the end the child will make his own choice as to what is best. Such complete freedom; however, rests upon a notion that children might indeed make incorrect choices; ones that are base don incomplete knowledge of the real world. The need to make rational choice
Educational Philosophy Although not old in years and experience, my educational philosophy is fortunately commensurate with the institution I am presently working for as a teacher. This institution is committed to one of the oldest and most respected academic traditions in existence, that of the Jesuit Catholic tradition of rigorous, questioning inquiry in education. It also stresses a strong community service tradition, along with the Catholic faith tradition. It combines
John Dewey and Charles Prosser were both instrumental figures in American educational philosophy and pedagogical theory. Both Dewey and Prosser were pragmatists, but each proposed a fundamentally different function for public education. Dewey stressed the importance of education for fostering civic duty and promoting democracy; Prosser remained more concerned with the role education would play in preparing children for vocational careers. Although both Dewey and Prosser believed education should be
This can shatter the confidence of the student and may even make him lose interest in the subject and teacher's views. For the development of students' critical thinking skills and their confidence, responsible teaching is highly desirable. Teachers need to understand that while they can foster discussion and debate, it is not necessary to impose their views on any student. Students come from variety of backgrounds and hence may need
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now