5 to 2 decades to adequately plan and construct. Thus, no is the time to look forward to the future of railway in Britain and invest in the possible. This will, in fact, protect the next two generations from being saddled with even higher debt and potentially a lower rate of benefits (Department of Transport 2009).
However, other research shows that the government's economic case is unsound because it depends on rates of return that are implausible as well as unproven synergies of growth demands created by the railway itself (e.g. because the railway is high-speed, more people will choose to use it). Less expensive solutions are available through alternative transport systems, and can likely be implemented more quickly, thus relieving congestion and serious urban problems now, rather than in years or decades. This is surmised by looking at the transportation trends over the past 15 years and finding that the benefit case is overstated somewhere between 40 and 150 per cent, depending on the variable. In addition, the psychographic and demographic portrayal of the business traveler is inconsistent with the costs of the new line (Bluespace Thinking 2010).
Analysis- Statistics professors often joke that there are three kinds of lies in the world: lies, damn lies, and then statistics. Both sides of the argument on the HS2 have extremely bright people working on the analysis, and while politicized, it is doubtful that either faction is actually telling falsehoods to get their point across. Rather, sometimes, when doing analysis, it is just as important to understand what was used for analysis as what was not. It is also reasonable that both sides would, in fact, need to make projections and assumptions that go forward 10-15 or more years. The government seems to believe that trends in transportation will geometrically jump, while the counter side believes they will only numerically improve. Second, the anti-HS2 side believes that the tremendous cost in money and resources afforded by the HS2 expansion could be used better elsewhere, to glean a quicker solution to the problems of pollution and overcrowding. It is also interesting that there is a clear polarization between large and small government on the issue -- with the smaller, regional and township councils opposing the project.
Simply reducing the maximum speed to between 300 and 320 km/h...
The National Safety Council approximates the entire losses owing to traffic accidents in 2011 was about $250 billion. There were somewhere in the region of 3 trillion vehicle miles, and 1.7 people per vehicle, so all this protection cost of cars comes to 4.6 cents a passenger mile (as it turns out is more than twice more normal approximations). By means of this 4.6 cent number, a rail line that
In HS2: Valuing the benefits of HS2 (London-West Midlands), the authors consider the direct benefits and disbenefits to users, the wider economic impact, and other economic and social impacts arising from land use changes. The major benefits for users are journey time savings, reduced crowding, and improved reliability. Though HS2 would generate profits, it would cost the government money to implement it. Finally, Dr. J Savin conducted a financial
HS2 proposal is a government project to build a one hundred mile long High Speed Rail (HSR) line between London and Birmingham, England that, once completed, will have the capacity of carrying 28 trains per hour. These trains will be capable of 220 -- 250-mile per hour. It is projected by some experts that this line will reduce journey times from London to other cities by up to 30 minutes.
High Speed II (HS2) in an initiative by the British government to invest in the future of the country's rail network in order to transform its economic geography. The project is aimed at helping businesses to function more productively, bring key cities closer together, and foster the growth of employment and regeneration. Moreover, the high speed II rail initiative is for the purpose of providing alternatives to domestic aviation and
High Speed Rail With greater economic and population growth, there is crowding issues on existing rail lines, poor journey times, areas that have been neglected with existing rail ways, and a greater carbon issue. In efforts to reduce the CO2 emissions, the government has encouraged less car usage, less air travel usage, and more train travel. In these efforts a new high speed rail line has been proposed. The proposed High
As the report, is highlighting several key points that are outlining the strengths of the system. The most notable include: it will reduce congestion, there will be greater levels of productivity, it will integrate the English rail system with the rest of Europe and it can improve the nation's ability to remain competitive. These different elements are important, because they are showing how this strategy will address Britain's current
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now