• Home
  • /
  • Topic
  • /
  • Law
  • /
  • Courts
  • /
  • How Judges Are Selected in South Dakota and Pennsylvania Research Paper
Verified Document

How Judges Are Selected In South Dakota And Pennsylvania Research Paper

The State Judicial Selection Process Pennsylvania

Supreme, Superior and Commonwealth Courts

The Judiciary of Pennsylvania consists of a supreme court, superior court, commonwealth court, court of common pleas and minor courts. The commonwealth, superior and supreme courts are appellate courts responsible for hearing and reviewing the appeals of cases that have already been heard at lower level courts, with Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court being the highest court level for appeals to go to.

Selection process. When it comes to selecting judges for the different Pennsylvanian courts, there are numerous spots to fill: there are seven justices of the state’s supreme court, 15 judges on the superior court, nine judges on the commonwealth court, and 439 judges in the court of common pleas. All of them are selected in the same manner: they run in partisan primaries which are then followed by a general election process, in which the winners of the partisan primaries compete. All elected judges serve terms of 10 years, and at the end of their term, the retention vote takes place if the judge wishes to continue to serve (Judicial Selection in Pennsylvania, 2018).

Retention process. The way in which judges are retained is different in Pennsylvania than in most states—that is because Pennsylvania operates a “yes-no retention election” process for judges who “wish to continue serving” (Judicial Selection in Pennsylvania, 2018). The retention election process is a “periodic process whereby voters are asked whether an incumbent judge should remain in office for another term. The judge, who does not face an opponent, is removed from the position if a percentage of voters (often 50 percent) indicate that he or she should not be retained” (Retention Election, 2018). The retention process is used for judges have been elected in the state and the purpose of this process is to take the political pressure of having to run for office every election cycle off of judges and allow them to focus on doing their jobs (Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania, 2018).

Qualifications. Qualifications that judges must meet in the state of Pennsylvania include: 1) being a member of the Bar of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court (mandatory except for magisterial district judges) (The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania, 2018); 2) judges must adhere to the Code of Judicial Conduct in the Pennsylvania Rules of Court, the “Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges,” and other court rules and orders set by Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court, as well as standards identified in the Pennsylvania Constitution. Failure to abide by these rules, regulations and standards...

Other qualifications to serve as a judge in Pennsylvania are that the judge must have lived in a state residence for at least one year prior to running (and must have lived within the district for at least one year if running for common pleas court), and must be under the age of 70 (75 is the retirement age for judges in Pennsylvania) (Judicial Selection in Pennsylvania, 2018).
Limited Jurisdiction Courts

Limited jurisdiction courts (magisterial districts and municipal court) are a little different in the fact that these judges only serve six year terms and are not subject to retention elections following the conclusion of their term. Instead, they must face re-election again. The election process is the same as will all other judges in the state—partisan elections consisting of primaries followed by a general election take place for the selection of the judge. Vacancies are filled by the governor. Qualifications for judges of limited jurisdiction courts include: being a local resident for at least one year, being a member of the state bar, being older than 21, and being under the age of 75 (Judicial Selection in Pennsylvania, 2018).

South Dakota

In South Dakota, the process of selecting judges is somewhat different. In this state, the selection of state court judges is conducted via a hybrid process consisting of both appointments and elections. However, at every level of South Dakota’s judicial system, the process is different—from the supreme court level to the circuit and magistrate courts.

Supreme Court

Selection process. At the supreme court level in South Dakota, the five justices who preside over this court are selected (i.e., appointed) by the governor, who picks from a list that is given him by the South Dakota Judicial Qualifications Commission. The list must consist of at least two names so that the governor actually has a choice in the selection. Judges who are appointed to the supreme court of the state serve an initial three year term, and then, as in Pennsylvania, they run in a yes-no retention election during the next general election. Following that, the term of these justices lasts for eight years at a stretch (Judicial Selection in South Dakota, 2018).

Qualifications. Qualifications required to serve as a justice on South Dakota’s Supreme Court consist of: being a United States citizen and resident of the state; having acted as a voting resident with the respective district; licensed to practice law in the state, and being under eth age of 70. It is state law that no justice on the supreme court…

Sources used in this document:

References

Judicial Selection in Pennsylvania. (2018). Retrieved from

https://ballotpedia.org/Judicial_selection_in_Pennsylvania

Judicial Selection in South Dakota. (2018). Retrieved from

https://ballotpedia.org/Judicial_selection_in_South_Dakota

Retention Election. (2018). Retrieved from https://ballotpedia.org/Retention_election

SD Codified L. 16-1-4.1. (2012). Retrieved from

https://law.justia.com/codes/south-dakota/2012/title16/chapter01/16-1-41

The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania. (2018). Retrieved from

http://www.pacourts.us/learn/how-judges-are-elected

http://www.ujs.sd.gov/uploads/SecondCircuit/bluebook.pdf

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Drones Preliminary Analysis of Drones Have Become
Words: 6582 Length: 22 Document Type: Term Paper

Drones Preliminary Analysis of Drones Drones have become increasingly popular among the U.S. army and the reason is that they have ability to transform (has already transformed to quite an extent) the way America has been fighting and the way it has been thinking about its wars. According to the intelligence officials of the United States, these unmanned aerial vehicles that are commonly called drones have proved to be one of the

Fault: An Alternative to the Current Tort-Based
Words: 30263 Length: 110 Document Type: Thesis

Fault: An Alternative to the Current Tort-Based System in England and Wales The United Kingdom statistics regarding claims THE NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM OBSTACLES TO DUE PROCESS THE CASE FOR REFORM THE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT THE RISING COST OF LITIGATION LORD WOOLF'S REFORMS MORE COST CONTROLS THE UNITED STATES PAUL'S PULLOUT THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY TORT REFORM IN AMERICA FLEEING PHYSICIANS STATISTICS FOR ERROR, INJURY AND DEATH THE CALL FOR REFORM IN 2003: A FAMILIAR REFRAIN THE UNITED STATES SITUATION, IN SUMMARY NEW ZEALAND CASE STUDIES THE SWEDISH SCHEME COMPARISON: WHICH SYSTEM IS

Why Only Christian Psychologists Can Practice "True Psychology"
Words: 19429 Length: 71 Document Type: Dissertation or Thesis complete

Soul: Why Only Christian Psychologists Can Practice "True Psychology" Today, there are more than one hundred thousand licensed psychologists practicing in the United States. These mental health professionals are in a unique position to provide individuals, groups, and American society with valuable counseling services for a wide range of mental health issues and mental disorders. This study uses a triangulated research approach to demonstrate that true psychology can be done

John Locke: Political Thought on
Words: 4766 Length: 15 Document Type: Essay

S. Constitution as offering much protection but instead view it as being the responsibility of the states to provide protection for private property owners. In the event that the courts "...continue to abdicate their role as the protector of individuals rights, then big government and powerful corporations will continue to run roughshod over the property interest of small landowners." (Liles, 2006, p.372) Liles holds that the legislature being allowed a leeway

Constitution Gave Congress the Power of Legislation.
Words: 2392 Length: 8 Document Type: Term Paper

Constitution gave Congress the power of legislation. In fact, its major function is to make laws. Essentially, Congress converts public will into public policy by way of law. The Constitution provides some rules to which Congress must adhere throughout the legislative process however; over the years there have been additions and modifications to the procedure. Currently, there is debate over how to reform the legislative process. The general legislative process is

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now