Verified Document

Hobbes Vs. Locke Thomas Hobbes And John Essay

Hobbes vs. Locke Thomas Hobbes and John Locke each provide intriguing opinions concerning the state of nature, but their thinking differs when considering the form of governing that each promotes as being the most effective. The individuals in Locke's example of a government appear to have greater security than those in Hobbes', as the latter considers that there would be nothing wrong with people renouncing some of their rights in order to be provided with protection from the government. Locke emphasized that rights such as life, liberty, and the right to own property are inalienable and that it would be wrong for an institution, regardless of its intentions, to deny people of them.

From Hobbes' perspective, people cannot possibly be trusted as long as they attempt to govern themselves and it is thus essential for a form of monarchy to control them and to provide a safe environment. In contrast, Locke believed that all that people needed in order to govern themselves were instructions with regard to concepts like rationality and morality, as by becoming proficient in such domains they would experience little to no problems in constructing a safe society. From Locke's point-of-view, in order for people to be able to understand his thinking, they would have to think about how "all government in the world is the product only of force and violence, and that men live together by no other rules but that of beasts, where the strongest carries it" (Locke).

Locke's "Second Treatise on Civil Government" makes it possible for readers to understand the philosopher's thinking from the very first lines. Locke...

One of the most interesting arguments relates to how history shows little to no precedents involving a community that was successfully ruled by the majority. Throughout history some of the most successful societies have involved absolute monarchs who were primarily interested in the well-being of the community rather than in the individual well-being of its members. Hobbes contributes to this idea by claiming that "monarchy is the only natural, i.e. original form of authority, the only form which corresponds to nature's original order, whereas aristocracy and democracy are artificially produced by men, merely 'cemented by human wit'" (Strauss 60).
While Hobbes and Locke both emphasize the need for a government in order to have a healthy society, the latter wants the majority to be a part of the respective government. Such a strategy would guarantee that power stays in the hands of the masses and that abuse does not take place. "Hobbes thinks that the purpose of reason is to 'acquire the knowledge of consequences' whereas Locke thinks that it 'teaches all mankind who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, Death,…

Sources used in this document:
Works cited:

Locke, John, "Second Treatise of Government," (MobileReference, 15.12.2009)

Martinich, A.P., "Hobbes," (Routledge, 11.01.2013)

Sofroniou, Andreas, "Therapeutic Philosophy For The Individual And The State," (Lulu.com, 1999)

Strauss, Leo, "The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis," (University of Chicago Press, 1963)
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Nature by Hobbe and Locke Thomas Hobbes,
Words: 1181 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Nature by Hobbe and Locke Thomas Hobbes, in Leviathan, bases his argument of an all-powerful and unlimited government on a scientifically modeled reasoning. He asserts that it is only a sovereign and an all-powerful government that has the authority to attract full obedience from the subjects thus preventing them from resorting to violent acts of rebellion, chaos, and violence. Hobbes uses the desire-aversion principle and the man's insatiable desire for power

John Locke Was Born in
Words: 1540 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

On the other hand, he suggested that the executive branch was responsible for insuring that the laws are actually obeyed and that it should operate continuously in society. His idea of a legislative body was one of a representative assembly, which would retain and exercise supreme power whenever it assembled. Its members would speak jointly for all people in that society. The executive and federative functions derived wholly from

Hobbes/Locke & Federalism One of
Words: 861 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

So, who was right? Well, it seems that history has taught us again and again that in certain conditions, humans do express their evil and competitive natures (e.g. fascism, genocide, etc.); but that in other situations, the species can be incredibly giving and benevolent (think of Mother Theresa, people helping people). The complexity is that humans are not all one type or another, but a combination. Most sociologists believe

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke
Words: 364 Length: 1 Document Type: Thesis

He favored a large and powerful government able to enforce its will on subjects, in order to control their natural unruliness. Locke, on the other hand thought men in the state of nature were good, but that due to their need to be secure in their property and to protect themselves from outside forces, they banded together to form a state to benefit themselves individually. He favored a limited

Locke V. Hobbes the Political
Words: 2599 Length: 9 Document Type: Thesis

Basically, Hobbes takes a long historical view of human society, and sees the continuation of civil societies -- i.e. those organized under governments -- as the prime necessity for any progress. Left in the state of nature, mankind could not be guaranteed the continued success of any long-term projects, and therefore would not desire to undertake them. Also, without the rule of law, many men would not feel any need

Locke and Hobbes
Words: 2234 Length: 8 Document Type: Term Paper

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke: Perspectives on Governance and Power Though John Locke's theory of natural law and natural rights at first glance seem to oppose the conservative authoritarianism of Thomas Hobbes', both men set out to establish a framework for governance that would protect the rights of individuals. John Locke takes the approach that a democratic nation with a system of checks and balances was an essential ingredient to protecting

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now